Best vitJournals Alternatives in 2026
The top vitJournals alternatives are EasyChair, Microsoft CMT and OpenReview: 15 manuscript submission software our editors would look at instead of vitJournals, in our ranking order.
vitJournals: A configurable journal workflow system with reviewer tracking, reminders, and statistics. Where it falls short: pricing requires an email inquiry for a personalized quotation.
Switching from vitJournals? For most manuscript submission software buyers the best vitJournals alternative is EasyChair, built for established conferences managing the full submission cycle.
Why People Look for a vitJournals Alternative
- Pricing requires an email inquiry for a personalized quotation
- Cloud deployment may not suit teams seeking other deployment options
- Focused on journal submission and peer-review workflows
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallEasyChair9.3
Established conferences managing the full submission cycle
Visit EasyChair - Best free optionEasyChair9.3
Has a free plan
Visit EasyChair
All 15 vitJournals Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forEstablished conferences managing the full submission cycle
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 9.3 vs 5.9
A web-based conference system spanning submissions, review, scheduling, and proceedings.
9.3/10★★★★★Visit EasyChair -
Best forConferences needing a free, full-featured workflow
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 9.1 vs 5.9
A free conference workflow spanning submissions, peer review, and presentation planning.
9.1/10★★★★★Visit Microsoft CMT -
Best forVenues needing configurable, open peer review
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 9.0 vs 5.9
A free, configurable review workflow for conferences, journals, workshops, and symposia.
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit OpenReview -
Best forJournals wanting free, end-to-end publishing workflows
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.9 vs 5.9
A free, open-source system for managing journal submissions through publication.
- ORCID integration
- Conference submissions
- Multi-journal management
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit site -
Best forResearch events needing free multi-stage review
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.8 vs 5.9
A free web platform for scientific events with configurable submissions and multi-stage review.
8.8/10★★★★☆Visit Sciencesconf -
Best forJournals seeking a supported paid peer-review platform
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 5.9
A journal-focused peer-review system with configurable workflows and annual plus per-submission fees.
- ORCID integration
- Conference submissions
- Multi-journal management
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit Scholastica -
Best forConferences needing deployment and event management
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.6 vs 5.9
Submission and peer review connect with scheduling, registration and event tools.
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit ConfTool -
Best forIEEE-oriented conferences processing papers
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.5 vs 5.9
A conference workflow system with configurable peer review and IEEE proceedings support.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit EDAS -
Best forLarge or hybrid conferences with varied submissions
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.4 vs 5.9
A connected submission, review, scheduling and delivery system for scholarly conferences.
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Ex Ordo -
Best forConferences wanting submissions plus attendee tools
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.3 vs 5.9
Fourwaves combines manuscript workflows with registration, scheduling, and attendee tools.
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit Fourwaves -
Best forAbstract-led events needing multi-stage review
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.2 vs 5.9
A free-to-start platform for abstract review, decisions, and conference scheduling.
8.2/10★★★★☆Try Oxford Abstracts -
Best forSmall conferences needing free submission and review
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.1 vs 5.9
Free web-based conference software for submission, blind review and proceedings workflows.
- Conference submissions
- Automated email notices
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit PaperDesk -
Best forInstitutions self-hosting events and submissions
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 8.0 vs 5.9
A self-hosted event system with abstract and paper review workflows.
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Indico -
Best forTeams wanting self-hosting and basic conference review
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 7.9 vs 5.9
Self-hosted conference workflows, with a free edition and paid options for added capabilities.
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit OpenConf -
Best forSmall events testing abstract review at no cost
- Better than vitJournals:
- Editor score 7.8 vs 5.9
A free starting point for small events managing abstract and paper reviews.
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit AbstractWiz
vitJournals Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to vitJournals?
EasyChair: #1 in our Manuscript Submission Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.3 out of 10. A web-based conference system spanning submissions, review, scheduling, and proceedings.
Is there a free alternative to vitJournals?
Yes. EasyChair, Microsoft CMT, OpenReview, Open Journal Systems and Sciencesconf have a free plan or a free tier (12 of the 15 alternatives on this page).
Why do people look for vitJournals alternatives?
Pricing requires an email inquiry for a personalized quotation; Cloud deployment may not suit teams seeking other deployment options; Focused on journal submission and peer-review workflows.
How do I switch from vitJournals?
Export your data from vitJournals (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel vitJournals.
How to Switch from vitJournals
- Export your data from vitJournals (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel vitJournals.
vitJournals vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | vitJournals | 5.9 | ||
| 1 | EasyChair | Yes | $4/unit usage-based | 9.3 |
| 2 | Microsoft CMT | Yes | Free | 9.1 |
| 3 | OpenReview | Yes | Free | 9.0 |
| 4 | Open Journal Systems | Yes | Free | 8.9 |
| 5 | Sciencesconf | Yes | Free | 8.8 |
| 6 | Scholastica | No | $500/unit/yr | 8.7 |
| 7 | ConfTool | Yes | 8.6 | |
| 8 | EDAS | No | $6/unit usage-based | 8.5 |
| 9 | Ex Ordo | 8.4 | ||
| 10 | Fourwaves | Yes | $899/yr | 8.3 |
| 11 | Oxford Abstracts | Yes | 8.2 | |
| 12 | PaperDesk | Yes | Free | 8.1 |
| 13 | Indico | Yes | Free | 8.0 |
| 14 | OpenConf | Yes | $600/yr | 7.9 |
| 15 | AbstractWiz | Yes | $270/unit one-time | 7.8 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update