Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

vitJournals review

#32 of 32 in Manuscript Submission Software

A configurable journal workflow system with reviewer tracking, reminders, and statistics.

5.9/10Editor score
vitJournals5.9 Visit vitJournals

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

For scholarly journal teams, vitJournals manages manuscripts from submission through editorial decision. Editors can configure workflows, monitor review stages, and organize work with user-specific task lists. It is aimed at small and mid-market organizations, with a Spanish-language interface that may suit teams working in Spanish. The product is cloud-based and provides email support.

Workflow configuration is central to the offering: teams can tailor intake forms and use customizable letters for authors and reviewers. Automated referee reminders, submission activity logs, and author and reviewer history tracking support follow-up across the review process. Reports cover submissions, decisions, and reviewer statistics, giving editors several ways to monitor activity without reducing the system to a submission inbox. Journals seeking manuscript handling through editorial decisions and review-stage visibility should find this scope relevant.

The vendor's product page asks interested journals to email for a personalized quotation, so buyers should plan to discuss pricing directly rather than compare published tiers. The listed product details describe a cloud offering with email support; teams evaluating alternatives should consider whether that deployment and support arrangement fits their requirements. vitJournals is a sensible candidate for smaller journals that want configurable peer-review workflows, correspondence tools, and reviewer tracking. Organizations needing a different deployment model or a broader platform beyond journal submission and review should assess other options.

vitJournals pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Configurable workflows and intake forms for journal processes
    • Tracks review stages, task lists, and author and reviewer histories
    • Automates referee reminders and provides submission statistics
  • Where it doesn't
    • Pricing requires an email inquiry for a personalized quotation
    • Cloud deployment may not suit teams seeking other deployment options
    • Focused on journal submission and peer-review workflows

vitJournals fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update