Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Remote Video Support Software

Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant vs Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant #2 in Remote Video Support Software 4.0/10 From $50/user/mo (annual) ✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Salesforce
Higher score Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance #5 in Remote Video Support Software 5.8/10 From $35/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial ✓ 1 of 5 features Visit Blitzz

Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant leads on 0 checks, Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance on 2, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBlitzz Visual Remote Assistance · 5.8/10
  • Lowest starting priceBlitzz Visual Remote Assistance · $35/user/mo
  • Most featuresBlitzz Visual Remote Assistance · 1 of 5

Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance scores higher on our rubric for remote video support software: 5.8 against 4.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #2.

Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance is cheaper to start at $35/user/mo against $50/user/mo. Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance offers co-browsing; Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant doesn't publish it.

Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant is the better fit for salesforce-centric service and field teams. Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance is the better fit for teams needing app-free support with CRM connections.

  • Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant fits best

    Salesforce-centric service and field teams

  • Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance fits best

    Teams needing app-free support with CRM connections

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant 4.0/10 Visit ↗ Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance 5.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 4.0 5.8
Ranking #2 in Remote Video Support Software #5 in Remote Video Support Software
Best for Salesforce-centric service and field teams Teams needing app-free support with CRM connections
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $50/user/mo $35/user/mo (best)
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Support Community, Docs Email, Tickets, Docs
Integrations 3 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant 0/5 · Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance 1/5
Live video sessions Not published Not published
Browser-based sessions Not published Not published
Co-browsing Not published ✓ (best)
Live annotations Not published Not published
Session recording Not published Not published
Specs
Mobile support Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Customers join from a mobile browser without downloading an app.
  • Combines live video, desktop sharing, recording, and AR annotations.
  • Integrates with Salesforce Service Cloud and Field Service workflows.
  • Customers join browser video calls without downloading an app.
  • Screen sharing, live pointers, markup, and OCR support visual troubleshooting.
  • Integrates with Salesforce, ServiceNow, Zendesk, and HubSpot.
Cons
  • The add-on costs $50 per user per month with annual billing.
  • Its listed integrations are limited to Salesforce products.
  • No standalone Visual Remote Assistant free plan is offered.
  • No free plan; Professional starts at $35 per user per month, billed annually.
  • Enterprise features such as SSO/SAML are reserved for the Enterprise plan.
  • Support is listed through email, tickets, and documentation.
Our verdict

Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant brings live two-way video support into customer service, contact-center, field-service, and sales workflows. Customers join through a secure link in a mobile browser without downloading an app; agents can…

Read the review →

Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance, also marketed as Blitzz Concierge, connects support agents and customers through browser-based video sessions. It is aimed at contact centers and field service teams handling equipment troubleshooting,…

Read the review →
  1. Salesforce Visual Remote AssistantRemote Video Support Software 4.0From $50/user/mo (annual)
  2. Blitzz Visual Remote AssistanceRemote Video Support Software 5.8From $35/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant — where it wins

    • Customers join from a mobile browser without downloading an app.
    • Combines live video, desktop sharing, recording, and AR annotations.
    • Integrates with Salesforce Service Cloud and Field Service workflows.

    Where it doesn't

    • The add-on costs $50 per user per month with annual billing.
    • Its listed integrations are limited to Salesforce products.
    • No standalone Visual Remote Assistant free plan is offered.
  • Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance — where it wins

    • Customers join browser video calls without downloading an app.
    • Screen sharing, live pointers, markup, and OCR support visual troubleshooting.
    • Integrates with Salesforce, ServiceNow, Zendesk, and HubSpot.

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; Professional starts at $35 per user per month, billed annually.
    • Enterprise features such as SSO/SAML are reserved for the Enterprise plan.
    • Support is listed through email, tickets, and documentation.
  • Salesforce Visual Remote Assistant4.0/10 · From $50/user/mo (annual)

    A Salesforce add-on for live visual support, priced at $50 per user monthly, billed annually.

    Visit SalesforceFull verdict →
  • Blitzz Visual Remote Assistance5.8/10 · From $35/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial

    App-free visual support with screen sharing, markup, OCR, and CRM integrations.

    Visit BlitzzFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026