Head-to-head · Company Databases
D&B Hoovers vs Demandbase
D&B Hoovers leads on 0 checks, Demandbase on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreD&B Hoovers · 9.2/10
D&B Hoovers scores higher on our rubric for company databases: 9.2 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #9.
D&B Hoovers is the better fit for broad, mature B2B prospecting databases. Demandbase is the better fit for account-based sales and marketing teams.
- D&B Hoovers fits best
Broad, mature B2B prospecting databases
- Demandbase fits best
Account-based sales and marketing teams
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | D&B Hoovers 9.2/10 Visit ↗ | Demandbase 8.4/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Ranking | #2 in Company Databases | #9 in Company Databases |
| Best for | Broad, mature B2B prospecting databases | Account-based sales and marketing teams |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $529/yr | Pricing on request |
| Free plan | — | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Browser extension |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Chrome extension |
| Support | Live chat, Phone, Docs | Email, Tickets, Community, Docs |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features D&B Hoovers 1/4 · Demandbase 1/4 | ||
| Advanced filters | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Technographic data | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Intent signals | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Company records | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Monthly export limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | D&B Hoovers is a B2B sales intelligence platform from Dun & Bradstreet for sales and marketing teams that need company and contact research, targeted list building, and prospect prioritization. Its published category specifications… Read the review → |
Demandbase is a B2B go-to-market platform for sales, marketing, advertising, and revenue teams. It combines a 200-million-company database with business email, direct-dial, and mobile contact data, helping account-based teams find… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
D&B Hoovers — where it wins
- 520M-company database with direct dials and contact data
- Buyer intent, technographics, alerts, and AI prospect scoring
- Web, API, CRM integration, and dynamic SmartLists
Where it doesn't
- No free plan; access is paid
- Entry plans use limited company and contact credits
- The Essentials plans are credit-based rather than unlimited
Demandbase — where it wins
- 200M-company database with direct-dial and mobile contact data
- Buying-group, intent, technographic, and decision-maker intelligence
- CRM integrations, REST APIs, and AI-assisted prioritization
Where it doesn't
- Custom pricing requires contacting Demandbase
- No free plan is available
- Its broad go-to-market scope may exceed a contact database need
- D&B Hoovers9.2/10 · Paid
A mature B2B database combining company data, intent signals, and AI prospecting tools.
Visit D&B HooversFull verdict → - Demandbase8.4/10 · Pricing on request
A broad B2B intelligence platform for account-based sales and marketing.
Visit DemandbaseFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Global Database vs D&B Hoovers
- D&B Hoovers vs Orbis
- D&B Hoovers vs HG Insights
- D&B Hoovers vs ZoomInfo
- D&B Hoovers vs PrivCo
- D&B Hoovers vs Similarweb Sales Intelligence
All company databases comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






