Head-to-head · B2B Contact Data Providers
D&B Hoovers vs Cognism
D&B Hoovers leads on 0 checks, Cognism on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreD&B Hoovers · 9.0/10
D&B Hoovers scores higher on our rubric for b2b contact data providers: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.
D&B Hoovers is the better fit for established company intelligence buyers. Cognism is the better fit for enterprise teams needing rich signals.
- D&B Hoovers fits best
Established company intelligence buyers
- Cognism fits best
Enterprise teams needing rich signals
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | D&B Hoovers 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Cognism 8.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Ranking | #4 in B2B Contact Data Providers | #6 in B2B Contact Data Providers |
| Best for | Established company intelligence buyers | Enterprise teams needing rich signals |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $529/yr | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Browser extension |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Chrome extension |
| Support | Live chat, Phone, Docs | Live chat, Email, Tickets, Docs |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 8 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features D&B Hoovers 4/4 · Cognism 4/4 | ||
| Direct-dial data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Intent data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Technographic filters | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Contact database size | 5.2e+08 contacts | Not checked yet |
| Monthly export limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | D&B Hoovers is a B2B sales intelligence platform for sales and marketing teams that need company research, contact discovery, targeted list building, and prospect prioritization. Its database covers 520 million contacts, with tools for… Read the review → |
Cognism is a B2B contact data and sales intelligence platform for sales, marketing, and revenue operations teams. It combines searchable company and contact profiles with verified email and mobile data, firmographic and demographic… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
D&B Hoovers — where it wins
- 520M-contact database with company and contact search
- Intent data, AI scoring, trigger alerts, and buying-group identification
- API access, CRM integration, and dynamic SmartLists
Where it doesn't
- No free plan is available
- Integrations are limited
- Credit-based plans may require careful volume planning
Cognism — where it wins
- 440 million-contact database with verified email and mobile data
- Over 20,000 technographic filters plus Bombora intent signals
- CRM, sales-engagement, browser extension, and API access
Where it doesn't
- No free plan for smaller teams to evaluate independently
- Pricing is sales-led rather than published numerically
- Advanced capabilities require the Pro package
- D&B Hoovers9.0/10 · Paid
A broad B2B intelligence platform with intent, scoring, alerts, and API access.
Visit D&B HooversFull verdict → - Cognism8.7/10 · Pricing on request
A signal-rich prospecting platform for enterprise teams that can justify sales-led pricing.
Visit CognismFull verdict →
More comparisons
- ZoomInfo vs Cognism
- Apollo vs D&B Hoovers
- Apollo vs Cognism
- Lusha vs D&B Hoovers
- Lusha vs Cognism
- D&B Hoovers vs 6sense
- D&B Hoovers vs People Data Labs
- D&B Hoovers vs Seamless.AI
All B2B contact data providers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






