The Best Git Hosting Services in 2026
We researched Git hosting services from official websites, including pricing pages, plan tables, and product documentation. Rankings focus on repository collaboration, value for money, and verified features such as access controls, CI/CD, storage, and workflow support.
Our top picks
-
Top ranked
Bitbucket#1 of 358.9/10A broad Git hosting service for teams that want repositories, reviews, automation, and Atlassian integration.
Free plan
-
Runner-up
Perforce TeamHub#2 of 358.7/10A broad repository platform for enterprises managing mixed source-code environments.
Pricing on request
-
Top-ranked free plan
AWS CodeCommit#3 of 358.5/10A low-cost private Git service for teams already invested in AWS.
Free plan
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
The full ranking 35 tools, best first
-
Best forTeams wanting broad hosted Git workflows
A broad Git hosting service for teams that want repositories, reviews, automation, and Atlassian integration.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Bitbucket -
Best forMixed-repository enterprise environments
A broad repository platform for enterprises managing mixed source-code environments.
- Built-in wiki
8.7/10★★★★☆Try Perforce TeamHub -
Best forAWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git
A low-cost private Git service for teams already invested in AWS.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit AWS CodeCommit -
Best forTeams needing hosting plus project planning
A paid Git host for teams that want code management and planning in one workspace.
- Built-in wiki
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Assembla -
Best forDevelopers building self-hosted Git infrastructure
A mature, flexible foundation for teams building their own Git infrastructure.
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Git -
Best forCursor-centered development teams
Git hosting for teams building around Cursor's agents and workflows.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Cursor Origin -
Best forTeams prioritizing governance and security
A governance-focused Git service for teams already invested in Harness.
- Built-in CI/CD
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Harness -
Best forEnterprise self-hosted code review
A specialized enterprise platform for self-hosted, multi-repository code review.
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit RhodeCode -
Best forUbuntu and open-source project maintainers
A strong fit for Ubuntu projects, but its specialized workflow narrows broader Git hosting appeal.
- Built-in CI/CD
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Launchpad -
Best forUnix-oriented teams needing Git and Mercurial
A focused Git and Mercurial forge for Unix-oriented, email-friendly workflows.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit SourceHut -
Best forFree Git hosting with CI and packages
A broad free GitLab-based host for repositories, CI, Pages, and packages.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit GitGud.io -
Best forSelf-hosters wanting a simple open-source forge
A simple open-source forge for teams that want to operate Git themselves.
- Built-in wiki
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit GitBucket -
Best forSelf-hosters needing a broad lightweight forge
A broad self-hosted forge with repositories, collaboration tools, and flexible authentication.
- Built-in wiki
7.4/10★★★★☆Visit Gogs -
Best forOpen-source teams seeking free hosting
A capable free Git host for open-source teams that can work within hosted CI limits.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.3/10★★★★☆Visit Codeberg -
Best forSelf-hosted Git and Mercurial teams
A focused, open-source choice for teams hosting Git and Mercurial on their own servers.
7.2/10★★★★☆Visit Kallithea -
Best forTeams wanting a feature-rich Git forge
A broad Git forge with a useful free plan and storage flexibility for teams.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.0/10★★★★☆Visit GitForge -
Best forTeams seeking a regional GitLab-style forge
A GitLab-based forge with CI/CD, collaboration tools, APIs, and AI-assisted development.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
6.8/10★★★☆☆Visit JiHuLab.com -
Best forSimple self-hosted Git collaboration
A focused self-hosted Git forge for teams needing core collaboration tools.
6.7/10★★★☆☆Visit GitCamp -
Best forTeams focused on package registry workflows
A package registry with broad format support, tokens, search, and CI/CD integration.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
6.6/10★★★☆☆Visit GitLab -
Best forWindows teams needing basic self-hosted Git
A free, open-source Git server for teams that want basic on-premises hosting.
6.6/10★★★☆☆Visit Bonobo Git -
Best forPublic repositories and lightweight collaboration
A focused free host for public repositories, with useful mirroring and permission controls.
6.5/10★★★☆☆Visit repo.or.cz -
Best forTeams wanting low-cost hosted Git with CI
Private Git hosting with CI, backups, deployment, and project management.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
6.4/10★★★☆☆Visit ProjectLocker -
Best forBudget users needing multi-VCS hosting
Affordable multi-VCS hosting with project management, permissions and backups.
- Built-in wiki
6.3/10★★★☆☆Visit site -
Best forDevelopers building custom repository storage
API-first Git storage for custom systems, with usage-based pricing and broad repository controls.
6.2/10★★★☆☆Visit Code Storage -
Best forLinux administrators needing granular Git access
A focused Git access layer for Linux teams that need detailed repository permissions.
6.1/10★★★☆☆Visit Gitolite -
Best forSelf-hosters needing basic Git administration
A focused Git server for self-hosters who need repository administration and access control.
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Gitblit -
Best forFree basic Forgejo-based repository hosting
A focused Forgejo-based forge for free public repository hosting and discovery.
5.9/10★★★☆☆Visit Devtronic -
Best forTeams needing multi-VCS project tracking
A multi-VCS workspace with reviews, tickets, milestones, permissions and APIs.
- Built-in wiki
5.8/10★★★☆☆Visit Codebase -
Best forGoogle Cloud security-conscious enterprises
A security-focused Git service for enterprises already invested in Google Cloud.
- Built-in CI/CD
5.7/10★★★☆☆Visit Google Cloud -
Best forTeams adding code security to GitHub
A focused CodeQL security layer for teams building on GitHub.
5.6/10★★★☆☆Visit GitHub CodeQL -
Best forTeams needing configurable hosted or self-hosted CI
A configurable CI/CD service with a free plan, but limited fit for a Git-hosting category.
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit GitVerse -
Best forTeams needing configurable pipeline automation
Configurable YAML pipelines for teams automating builds, tests, and releases.
5.4/10★★★☆☆Visit GitFlic -
Best forTeams managing software test plans
A focused test-management service with traceability, reporting, and pipeline-connected automation.
5.3/10★★★☆☆Explore Test Plans -
Best forTeams wanting free visual CI/CD orchestration
A free Gitee CI/CD service with visual and YAML pipeline orchestration.
5.2/10★★★☆☆Visit Gitee Go -
Best forUsers seeking free desktop video editing
Avidemux suits straightforward desktop video processing, not timeline-based editing.
5.1/10★★★☆☆Visit Avidemux
No tools match those filters.
Compare at a glance
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bitbucket | Yes | 8.9 | |
| 2 | Perforce TeamHub | No | 8.7 | |
| 3 | AWS CodeCommit | Yes | 8.5 | |
| 4 | Assembla | No | $12.50/user/mo | 8.4 |
| 5 | Git | Yes | Free | 8.2 |
| 6 | Cursor Origin | No | $20/user/mo | 8.1 |
| 7 | Harness Code Repository | Yes | 8.0 | |
| 8 | RhodeCode Enterprise | No | $75/user/yr | 7.9 |
| 9 | Launchpad | Yes | Free | 7.8 |
| 10 | SourceHut | Yes | $4/user/mo | 7.7 |
| 11 | GitGud.io | Yes | Free | 7.6 |
| 12 | GitBucket | Free | 7.5 | |
| 13 | Gogs | Free | 7.4 | |
| 14 | Codeberg | Yes | Free | 7.3 |
| 15 | Kallithea | Free | 7.2 | |
| 16 | GitForge | Yes | $12/user/mo | 7.0 |
| 17 | JiHuLab.com | Yes | 6.8 | |
| 18 | GitCamp | Free | 6.7 | |
| 19 | GitLab Package Registry | Yes | $29/user/mo | 6.6 |
| 20 | Bonobo Git Server | Yes | Free | 6.6 |
| 21 | repo.or.cz | Free | 6.5 | |
| 22 | ProjectLocker | Yes | $19/mo | 6.4 |
| 23 | Repository Hosting | No | $6/mo | 6.3 |
| 24 | Code Storage | No | 6.2 | |
| 25 | Gitolite | Free | 6.1 | |
| 26 | Gitblit | Yes | Free | 6.0 |
| 27 | Devtronic Git Hosting | Yes | Free | 5.9 |
| 28 | Codebase | No | £20/mo | 5.8 |
| 29 | Secure Source Manager | No | $1,000/mo | 5.7 |
| 30 | GitHub CodeQL | Yes | $30/user/mo | 5.6 |
| 31 | GitVerse CI/CD | Yes | 5.5 | |
| 32 | GitFlic CI/CD | Yes | 5.4 | |
| 33 | Azure Test Plans | Yes | $52/user/mo | 5.3 |
| 34 | Gitee Go | Yes | Free | 5.2 |
| 35 | Avidemux | Yes | Free | 5.1 |
Head-to-head All 28 comparisons →
- Bitbucket vs Perforce TeamHub
- Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit
- Bitbucket vs Assembla
- Bitbucket vs Git
- Bitbucket vs Cursor Origin
- Bitbucket vs Harness Code Repository
- Bitbucket vs RhodeCode Enterprise
- Perforce TeamHub vs AWS CodeCommit
- Perforce TeamHub vs Assembla
Explore other topics All topics →
- AI Tools 303 directories · 8,267 tools ranked AI Writing Tools · AI Video Generators · Text-to-Speech Software
- Web Hosting & Domains 275 directories · 6,107 tools ranked Shared Web Hosting · Managed Cloud Hosting · Dedicated Server Hosting
- Productivity 157 directories · 4,948 tools ranked Note-Taking Apps · Calendar Apps · Project Management Software
- Marketing 135 directories · 3,978 tools ranked SEO Tools · Influencer Marketing Platforms · Email Marketing Software
- Sales & CRM 152 directories · 4,161 tools ranked Real Estate CRM Software · CRM Software · Proposal Software
- Customer Service 55 directories · 1,547 tools ranked Chatbot Builders · Knowledge Base Software · Call Center Software
How we rank git hosting services
Every tool on this page was researched by iTechGuides Editors from its official website — pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. We rank on how well each one does this category's core job, what the free or entry plan includes, and where it falls short. Where we have enough verified facts, the score out of 10 is a rubric — job fit, value and how much we could verify — shown with its breakdown on every tool's page; a tool we have not verified enough to score yet shows its rank without a number. Scores are re-checked when a product changes its plans. Read the full editorial policy, or submit a tool we missed.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update