Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Git Hosting Services

Perforce TeamHub vs AWS CodeCommit

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Perforce TeamHub #2 in Git Hosting Services 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 3 features Try Perforce TeamHub
AWS CodeCommit #3 in Git Hosting Services 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit AWS CodeCommit

Perforce TeamHub leads on 0 checks, AWS CodeCommit on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePerforce TeamHub · 8.7/10
  • Free planonly AWS CodeCommit
  • Most featuresPerforce TeamHub · 1 of 3

Perforce TeamHub scores higher on our rubric for git hosting services: 8.7 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

AWS CodeCommit offers free plan; Perforce TeamHub doesn't.

Perforce TeamHub is the better fit for mixed-repository enterprise environments. AWS CodeCommit is the better fit for AWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git.

  • Perforce TeamHub fits best

    Mixed-repository enterprise environments

  • AWS CodeCommit fits best

    AWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Perforce TeamHub 8.7/10 Visit ↗ AWS CodeCommit 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.5
Ranking #2 in Git Hosting Services #3 in Git Hosting Services
Best for Mixed-repository enterprise environments AWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — —
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs Docs
Integrations 75+ integrations 9 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Perforce TeamHub 1/3 · AWS CodeCommit 0/3
Built-in CI/CD — —
Built-in wiki ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Merge queue Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Artifact storage 1 GB Not checked yet
Git LFS storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
SSO support Saml Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Hosts Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories
  • Combines code review, wikis, issues, and Kanban boards
  • Supports cloud, on-premises, and API-based workflows
  • Private repositories with pull requests, reviews, branching, and merging
  • IAM access control plus encryption with AWS KMS
  • Connects with AWS Lambda, CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and CloudWatch
Cons
  • No free plan is available
  • Annual plans use quote-based pricing
  • May be broader than teams focused only on Git hosting
  • Current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers
  • Storage and Git requests are billed separately
  • It focuses on repository hosting rather than CI/CD
Our verdict

Perforce TeamHub is a source-code hosting and collaboration platform for development teams managing Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories. It also supports Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories for artifacts and files. Teams…

Read the review →

AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service for hosting private Git repositories in the AWS Cloud. It is aimed at software development teams and organizations that want source control near AWS build, staging, and production environments…

Read the review →
  1. Perforce TeamHubGit Hosting Services 8.7Pricing on request
  2. AWS CodeCommitGit Hosting Services 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Perforce TeamHub — where it wins

    • Hosts Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories
    • Combines code review, wikis, issues, and Kanban boards
    • Supports cloud, on-premises, and API-based workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Annual plans use quote-based pricing
    • May be broader than teams focused only on Git hosting
  • AWS CodeCommit — where it wins

    • Private repositories with pull requests, reviews, branching, and merging
    • IAM access control plus encryption with AWS KMS
    • Connects with AWS Lambda, CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and CloudWatch

    Where it doesn't

    • Current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers
    • Storage and Git requests are billed separately
    • It focuses on repository hosting rather than CI/CD

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update