Perforce TeamHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Perforce TeamHub8.1Visit AWS CodeCommit7.7Visit

Higher score Perforce TeamHub #2 in Git Hosting Services 8.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 3 features Try Perforce TeamHub

vs

AWS CodeCommit #3 in Git Hosting Services 7.7/10 Free plan · paid from $1/user/mo Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit AWS CodeCommit

• Perforce TeamHub fits best

  Mixed-repository enterprise environments

• AWS CodeCommit fits best

  AWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Perforce TeamHub 8.1/10 Visit ↗	AWS CodeCommit 7.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.1	7.7
Ranking	#2 in Git Hosting Services	#3 in Git Hosting Services
Best for	Mixed-repository enterprise environments	AWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git
Pricing model	Paid	Free plan + paid
Starting price	Not published	$1/user/mo
Free plan	—	✓ (best)
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Self-hosted	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Email, Docs	Docs
Integrations	75+ integrations	9 integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Perforce TeamHub 1/3 · AWS CodeCommit 0/3
Built-in CI/CD	—	—
Built-in wiki	✓ (best)	Not published
Merge queue	Not published	Not published
Specs
Artifact storage	1 GB	Not published
Git LFS storage	Not published	Not published
SSO support	Saml	Not published
Our review
Pros	Hosts Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories Combines code review, wikis, issues, and Kanban boards Supports cloud, on-premises, and API-based workflows	Private repositories with pull requests, reviews, branching, and merging IAM access control plus encryption with AWS KMS Connects with AWS Lambda, CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and CloudWatch
Cons	No free plan is available Annual plans use quote-based pricing May be broader than teams focused only on Git hosting	Current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers Storage and Git requests are billed separately It focuses on repository hosting rather than CI/CD
Our verdict	Perforce TeamHub is a source-code hosting and collaboration platform for development teams managing Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories. It also supports Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories for artifacts and files. Teams… Read the review →	AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service for hosting private Git repositories in the AWS Cloud. It is aimed at software development teams and organizations that want source control near AWS build, staging, and production environments… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Perforce TeamHub — where it wins

  • Hosts Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories
  • Combines code review, wikis, issues, and Kanban boards
  • Supports cloud, on-premises, and API-based workflows

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan is available
  • Annual plans use quote-based pricing
  • May be broader than teams focused only on Git hosting

• AWS CodeCommit — where it wins

  • Private repositories with pull requests, reviews, branching, and merging
  • IAM access control plus encryption with AWS KMS
  • Connects with AWS Lambda, CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and CloudWatch

  Where it doesn't

  • Current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers
  • Storage and Git requests are billed separately
  • It focuses on repository hosting rather than CI/CD

• Perforce TeamHub8.1/10 · Pricing on request

  A broad repository platform for enterprises managing mixed source-code environments.

  Try Perforce TeamHubFull verdict →
• AWS CodeCommit7.7/10 · Free plan · paid from $1/user/mo

  A low-cost private Git service for teams already invested in AWS.

  Visit AWS CodeCommitFull verdict →