Best AWS CodeCommit Alternatives in 2026
The top AWS CodeCommit alternatives are Bitbucket, Perforce TeamHub and Assembla: 15 git hosting services our editors would look at instead of AWS CodeCommit, in our ranking order.
AWS CodeCommit: A low-cost private Git service for teams already invested in AWS. Where it falls short: current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers.
Switching from AWS CodeCommit? For most git hosting services buyers the best AWS CodeCommit alternative is Bitbucket, built for teams wanting broad hosted Git workflows. On a budget, SourceHut starts at $4/user/mo. Perforce TeamHub offers the most artifact storage (1 GB).
Why People Look for an AWS CodeCommit Alternative
- Current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers
- Storage and Git requests are billed separately
- It focuses on repository hosting rather than CI/CD
- No built-in CI/CD — 7 of the alternatives below have it
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallBitbucket8.9
Teams wanting broad hosted Git workflows
Visit Bitbucket - Lowest priceSourceHut7.7
Paid plans from $4/user/mo
Visit SourceHut - Best free optionBitbucket8.9
Has a free plan
Visit Bitbucket - Most artifact storagePerforce TeamHub8.7
1 GB
Visit Perforce TeamHub - Best for built-in ci/cdBitbucket8.9
Built-in CI/CD (AWS CodeCommit: no)
Visit Bitbucket
All 15 AWS CodeCommit Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forTeams wanting broad hosted Git workflows
- Better than AWS CodeCommit:
- Built-in CI/CD
- Editor score 8.9 vs 8.5
A broad Git hosting service for teams that want repositories, reviews, automation, and Atlassian integration.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Bitbucket -
Best forMixed-repository enterprise environments
- Better than AWS CodeCommit:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 8.5
A broad repository platform for enterprises managing mixed source-code environments.
- Built-in wiki
8.7/10★★★★☆Try Perforce TeamHub -
Best forTeams needing hosting plus project planning
A paid Git host for teams that want code management and planning in one workspace.
- Built-in wiki
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Assembla -
Best forDevelopers building self-hosted Git infrastructure
A mature, flexible foundation for teams building their own Git infrastructure.
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Git -
Best forCursor-centered development teams
Git hosting for teams building around Cursor's agents and workflows.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Cursor Origin -
Best forTeams prioritizing governance and security
- Better than AWS CodeCommit:
- Built-in CI/CD
A governance-focused Git service for teams already invested in Harness.
- Built-in CI/CD
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Harness -
Best forEnterprise self-hosted code review
A specialized enterprise platform for self-hosted, multi-repository code review.
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit RhodeCode -
Best forUbuntu and open-source project maintainers
- Better than AWS CodeCommit:
- Built-in CI/CD
A strong fit for Ubuntu projects, but its specialized workflow narrows broader Git hosting appeal.
- Built-in CI/CD
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Launchpad -
Best forUnix-oriented teams needing Git and Mercurial
- Better than AWS CodeCommit:
- Built-in CI/CD
A focused Git and Mercurial forge for Unix-oriented, email-friendly workflows.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit SourceHut -
Best forFree Git hosting with CI and packages
- Better than AWS CodeCommit:
- Built-in CI/CD
A broad free GitLab-based host for repositories, CI, Pages, and packages.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit GitGud.io -
Best forSelf-hosters wanting a simple open-source forge
A simple open-source forge for teams that want to operate Git themselves.
- Built-in wiki
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit GitBucket -
Best forSelf-hosters needing a broad lightweight forge
A broad self-hosted forge with repositories, collaboration tools, and flexible authentication.
- Built-in wiki
7.4/10★★★★☆Visit Gogs -
Best forOpen-source teams seeking free hosting
- Better than AWS CodeCommit:
- Built-in CI/CD
A capable free Git host for open-source teams that can work within hosted CI limits.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.3/10★★★★☆Visit Codeberg -
Best forSelf-hosted Git and Mercurial teams
A focused, open-source choice for teams hosting Git and Mercurial on their own servers.
7.2/10★★★★☆Visit Kallithea -
Best forTeams wanting a feature-rich Git forge
- Better than AWS CodeCommit:
- Built-in CI/CD
A broad Git forge with a useful free plan and storage flexibility for teams.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.0/10★★★★☆Visit GitForge
AWS CodeCommit Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to AWS CodeCommit?
Bitbucket: #1 in our Git Hosting Services ranking, with an editor score of 8.9 out of 10. A broad Git hosting service for teams that want repositories, reviews, automation, and Atlassian integration.
Is there a free alternative to AWS CodeCommit?
Yes. Bitbucket, Git, Harness Code Repository, Launchpad and SourceHut have a free plan or a free tier (11 of the 15 alternatives on this page).
What is the cheapest paid alternative to AWS CodeCommit?
Of the alternatives here that publish a price, SourceHut starts lowest, at $4/user/mo.
Why do people look for AWS CodeCommit alternatives?
Current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers; Storage and Git requests are billed separately; It focuses on repository hosting rather than CI/CD.
Which AWS CodeCommit alternative has the most artifact storage?
Perforce TeamHub, with 1 GB.
How do I switch from AWS CodeCommit?
Export your data from AWS CodeCommit (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel AWS CodeCommit.
How to Switch from AWS CodeCommit
- Export your data from AWS CodeCommit (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel AWS CodeCommit.
AWS CodeCommit vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Built-in CI/CD | SSO support | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | AWS CodeCommit | Yes | No | 8.5 | ||
| 1 | Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Saml | 8.9 | |
| 2 | Perforce TeamHub | No | No | Saml | 8.7 | |
| 3 | Assembla | No | $12.50/user/mo | No | Saml | 8.4 |
| 4 | Git | Yes | Free | 8.2 | ||
| 5 | Cursor Origin | No | $20/user/mo | No | Saml_scim | 8.1 |
| 6 | Harness Code Repository | Yes | Yes | Saml_scim | 8.0 | |
| 7 | RhodeCode Enterprise | No | $75/user/yr | 7.9 | ||
| 8 | Launchpad | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.8 | |
| 9 | SourceHut | Yes | $4/user/mo | Yes | 7.7 | |
| 10 | GitGud.io | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.6 | |
| 11 | GitBucket | Free | No | None | 7.5 | |
| 12 | Gogs | Free | None | 7.4 | ||
| 13 | Codeberg | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.3 | |
| 14 | Kallithea | Free | 7.2 | |||
| 15 | GitForge | Yes | $12/user/mo | Yes | Saml_scim | 7.0 |
Head-to-Head
- AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket
- AWS CodeCommit vs Perforce TeamHub
- AWS CodeCommit vs Assembla
- AWS CodeCommit vs Git
- AWS CodeCommit vs Cursor Origin
- AWS CodeCommit vs Harness Code Repository
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update