Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Git Hosting Services

AWS CodeCommit vs Git

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score AWS CodeCommit #3 in Git Hosting Services 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit AWS CodeCommit
Git #5 in Git Hosting Services 8.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Git

AWS CodeCommit leads on 0 checks, Git on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAWS CodeCommit · 8.5/10
  • Free planboth

AWS CodeCommit scores higher on our rubric for git hosting services: 8.5 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

AWS CodeCommit is the better fit for AWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git. Git is the better fit for developers building self-hosted Git infrastructure.

  • AWS CodeCommit fits best

    AWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git

  • Git fits best

    Developers building self-hosted Git infrastructure

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature AWS CodeCommit 8.5/10 Visit ↗ Git 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.2
Ranking #3 in Git Hosting Services #5 in Git Hosting Services
Best for AWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git Developers building self-hosted Git infrastructure
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price — Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Community, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features AWS CodeCommit 0/3 · Git 0/3
Built-in CI/CD — Not checked yet
Built-in wiki Not checked yet Not checked yet
Merge queue Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Artifact storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Git LFS storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
SSO support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Private repositories with pull requests, reviews, branching, and merging
  • IAM access control plus encryption with AWS KMS
  • Connects with AWS Lambda, CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and CloudWatch
  • Distributed version control with complete local repository history
  • Powerful branching, merging, rebasing, and change-management commands
  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with a broad extension ecosystem
Cons
  • Current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers
  • Storage and Git requests are billed separately
  • It focuses on repository hosting rather than CI/CD
  • Primarily a command-line tool rather than a hosted web workspace
  • Hosted reviews, issues, and web administration are outside core Git
  • Large-file handling and file locking require the separate Git LFS extension
Our verdict

AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service for hosting private Git repositories in the AWS Cloud. It is aimed at software development teams and organizations that want source control near AWS build, staging, and production environments…

Read the review →

Git is a free, open-source distributed version control system for developers and teams managing software projects from small codebases to very large repositories. It records file changes in local repositories, preserves project history,…

Read the review →
  1. AWS CodeCommitGit Hosting Services 8.5Free plan
  2. GitGit Hosting Services 8.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • AWS CodeCommit — where it wins

    • Private repositories with pull requests, reviews, branching, and merging
    • IAM access control plus encryption with AWS KMS
    • Connects with AWS Lambda, CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and CloudWatch

    Where it doesn't

    • Current pricing states it is unavailable to new customers
    • Storage and Git requests are billed separately
    • It focuses on repository hosting rather than CI/CD
  • Git — where it wins

    • Distributed version control with complete local repository history
    • Powerful branching, merging, rebasing, and change-management commands
    • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with a broad extension ecosystem

    Where it doesn't

    • Primarily a command-line tool rather than a hosted web workspace
    • Hosted reviews, issues, and web administration are outside core Git
    • Large-file handling and file locking require the separate Git LFS extension

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update