Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Augmented Reality Software

MAKAR vs Onirix Studio

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score MAKAR #7 in Augmented Reality Software 6.9/10 From $245 ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit MAKAR
Onirix Studio #8 in Augmented Reality Software 6.8/10 From €45/mo (annual) · 15-day trial ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Onirix Studio

MAKAR leads on 3 checks, Onirix Studio on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMAKAR · 6.9/10
  • Most featuresMAKAR · 3 of 4

MAKAR scores higher on our rubric for augmented reality software: 6.9 against 6.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

MAKAR offers webar publishing; Onirix Studio doesn't publish it. MAKAR offers no-code authoring; Onirix Studio doesn't publish it. MAKAR offers experience analytics; Onirix Studio doesn't publish it.

MAKAR is the better fit for teams authoring and measuring cross-platform XR. Onirix Studio is the better fit for teams needing hosted web AR with APIs.

  • MAKAR fits best

    Teams authoring and measuring cross-platform XR

  • Onirix Studio fits best

    Teams needing hosted web AR with APIs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature MAKAR 6.9/10 Visit ↗ Onirix Studio 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 6.9 6.8
Ranking #7 in Augmented Reality Software #8 in Augmented Reality Software
Best for Teams authoring and measuring cross-platform XR Teams needing hosted web AR with APIs
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Mobile Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android Web, iOS, Android
Support Email, Phone, Docs Tickets, Docs
Integrations 3 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features MAKAR 3/4 · Onirix Studio 0/4
WebAR publishing ✓ (best) Not published
No-code authoring ✓ (best) Not published
Team collaboration Not published Not published
Experience analytics ✓ (best) Not published
Specs
Tracking methods Image recognition; GPS positioning Not published
Publishing targets Web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari); MAKAR app on mobile; Android and iOS apps via SDK; Windows and macOS editor Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Create projects without compiling programs and preview them in real time.
  • Publish WebAR/WebVR, use GPS or image recognition, or add features via mobile SDK.
  • Paid plans include analytics and expand storage and publication quotas by tier.
  • Build scenes with a drag-and-drop editor or edit HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
  • Publish hosted Web AR and share by QR code, public link or website embed.
  • Use image and world tracking, view metrics, and REST and JavaScript APIs.
Cons
  • The Free account lasts one month and limits projects, storage, publications and scans.
  • WebAR/WebVR publishing and analytics are unavailable on the Free plan.
  • Paid plans start at $245 per quarter; the quarter-price billing cadence is unspecified.
  • No free plan; Starter begins at €45/month with annual billing.
  • Self-hosting and the SDK are listed under Professional, not Starter.
  • Spatial AR and wayfinding are reserved for the higher-priced Plus plan.
Our verdict

MAKAR is an AR/VR/MR authoring product for individuals, businesses and schools that need to create and publish XR projects without compiling programs. Its XR Editor supports no-code authoring and real-time preview, while project management…

Read the review →

Onirix Studio is a cloud-based, low-code tool for creating, testing, hosting and publishing augmented reality experiences. It suits teams that want to deliver Web AR through mobile browsers rather than require a dedicated app, and offers…

Read the review →
  1. MAKARAugmented Reality Software 6.9From $245
  2. Onirix StudioAugmented Reality Software 6.8From €45/mo (annual) · 15-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • MAKAR — where it wins

    • Create projects without compiling programs and preview them in real time.
    • Publish WebAR/WebVR, use GPS or image recognition, or add features via mobile SDK.
    • Paid plans include analytics and expand storage and publication quotas by tier.

    Where it doesn't

    • The Free account lasts one month and limits projects, storage, publications and scans.
    • WebAR/WebVR publishing and analytics are unavailable on the Free plan.
    • Paid plans start at $245 per quarter; the quarter-price billing cadence is unspecified.
  • Onirix Studio — where it wins

    • Build scenes with a drag-and-drop editor or edit HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
    • Publish hosted Web AR and share by QR code, public link or website embed.
    • Use image and world tracking, view metrics, and REST and JavaScript APIs.

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; Starter begins at €45/month with annual billing.
    • Self-hosting and the SDK are listed under Professional, not Starter.
    • Spatial AR and wayfinding are reserved for the higher-priced Plus plan.
  • MAKAR6.9/10 · From $245

    No-code XR authoring with browser publishing, location-based content and engagement analytics.

    Visit MAKARFull verdict →
  • Onirix Studio6.8/10 · From €45/mo (annual) · 15-day trial

    A hosted Web AR suite with tracking, publishing and APIs, from €45/month billed annually.

    Visit Onirix StudioFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on augmented reality software

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update