Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Augmented Reality Software

TeamViewer Frontline vs MAKAR

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score TeamViewer Frontline #3 in Augmented Reality Software 7.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 4 features Contact TeamViewer
MAKAR #7 in Augmented Reality Software 6.9/10 From $245 ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit MAKAR

TeamViewer Frontline leads on 1 check, MAKAR on 2, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTeamViewer Frontline · 7.7/10
  • Most featuresMAKAR · 3 of 4

TeamViewer Frontline scores higher on our rubric for augmented reality software: 7.7 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

MAKAR offers webar publishing; TeamViewer Frontline doesn't publish it. TeamViewer Frontline offers team collaboration; MAKAR doesn't publish it. MAKAR offers experience analytics; TeamViewer Frontline doesn't publish it.

TeamViewer Frontline is the better fit for enterprises digitizing frontline work. MAKAR is the better fit for teams authoring and measuring cross-platform XR.

  • TeamViewer Frontline fits best

    Enterprises digitizing frontline work

  • MAKAR fits best

    Teams authoring and measuring cross-platform XR

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature TeamViewer Frontline 7.7/10 Visit ↗ MAKAR 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.7 6.9
Ranking #3 in Augmented Reality Software #7 in Augmented Reality Software
Best for Enterprises digitizing frontline work Teams authoring and measuring cross-platform XR
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Browser extension Cloud, Desktop, Mobile
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Support Email, Live chat, Phone, Tickets, Docs Email, Phone, Docs
Integrations 4 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features TeamViewer Frontline 2/4 · MAKAR 3/4
WebAR publishing Not published ✓ (best)
No-code authoring ✓ ✓
Team collaboration ✓ (best) Not published
Experience analytics Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Tracking methods Not published Image recognition; GPS positioning
Publishing targets Smart glasses, mobile devices; Assist guest access via iOS and Android mobile browsers Web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari); MAKAR app on mobile; Android and iOS apps via SDK; Windows and macOS editor
Our review
Pros
  • Guides picking, inspection, maintenance, assembly, and remote assistance
  • No-code workflow configuration and drag-and-drop 3D instructions
  • Connects with PLM, WMS, ERP, and Active Directory systems
  • Create projects without compiling programs and preview them in real time.
  • Publish WebAR/WebVR, use GPS or image recognition, or add features via mobile SDK.
  • Paid plans include analytics and expand storage and publication quotas by tier.
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Focused on industrial work rather than general-purpose AR creation
  • Documented destinations are smart glasses and mobile devices
  • The Free account lasts one month and limits projects, storage, publications and scans.
  • WebAR/WebVR publishing and analytics are unavailable on the Free plan.
  • Paid plans start at $245 per quarter; the quarter-price billing cadence is unspecified.
Our verdict

TeamViewer Frontline brings augmented reality into industrial and frontline work. It is aimed at enterprises digitizing logistics, manufacturing, inspection, and maintenance processes, as well as teams that need remote assistance. Workers…

Read the review →

MAKAR is an AR/VR/MR authoring product for individuals, businesses and schools that need to create and publish XR projects without compiling programs. Its XR Editor supports no-code authoring and real-time preview, while project management…

Read the review →
  1. TeamViewer FrontlineAugmented Reality Software 7.7Pricing on request
  2. MAKARAugmented Reality Software 6.9From $245

Strengths and trade-offs

  • TeamViewer Frontline — where it wins

    • Guides picking, inspection, maintenance, assembly, and remote assistance
    • No-code workflow configuration and drag-and-drop 3D instructions
    • Connects with PLM, WMS, ERP, and Active Directory systems

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Focused on industrial work rather than general-purpose AR creation
    • Documented destinations are smart glasses and mobile devices
  • MAKAR — where it wins

    • Create projects without compiling programs and preview them in real time.
    • Publish WebAR/WebVR, use GPS or image recognition, or add features via mobile SDK.
    • Paid plans include analytics and expand storage and publication quotas by tier.

    Where it doesn't

    • The Free account lasts one month and limits projects, storage, publications and scans.
    • WebAR/WebVR publishing and analytics are unavailable on the Free plan.
    • Paid plans start at $245 per quarter; the quarter-price billing cadence is unspecified.
  • TeamViewer Frontline7.7/10 · Pricing on request

    Enterprise AR for guided picking, inspections, assembly, and remote assistance.

    Contact TeamViewerFull verdict →
  • MAKAR6.9/10 · From $245

    No-code XR authoring with browser publishing, location-based content and engagement analytics.

    Visit MAKARFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on augmented reality software

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update