Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Cloud Document Management Software

Laserfiche vs Generis CARA

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Laserfiche #6 in Cloud Document Management Software 6.7/10 From $42/user/mo (annual) ✓ 0 of 7 features Visit Laserfiche
Generis CARA #8 in Cloud Document Management Software 6.6/10 From £65/user/mo ✓ 6 of 7 features Visit Generis CARA

Laserfiche leads on 0 checks, Generis CARA on 6, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreLaserfiche · 6.7/10
  • Most featuresGeneris CARA · 6 of 7

Laserfiche scores higher on our rubric for cloud document management software: 6.7 against 6.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #8.

Generis CARA offers document versioning; Laserfiche doesn't publish it. Generis CARA offers workflow automation; Laserfiche doesn't publish it. Generis CARA offers ocr-powered search; Laserfiche doesn't publish it. Generis CARA offers audit trail; Laserfiche doesn't publish it. Generis CARA offers electronic signatures; Laserfiche doesn't publish it.

Laserfiche is the better fit for organizations needing governance and automation. Generis CARA is the better fit for regulated teams needing controlled workflows.

  • Laserfiche fits best

    Organizations needing governance and automation

  • Generis CARA fits best

    Regulated teams needing controlled workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Laserfiche 6.7/10 Visit ↗ Generis CARA 6.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 6.7 6.6
Ranking #6 in Cloud Document Management Software #8 in Cloud Document Management Software
Best for Organizations needing governance and automation Regulated teams needing controlled workflows
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $42/user/mo Not published
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop, Mobile Cloud, Self-hosted, Mobile
Platforms Web, Windows, iOS, Android Web, iOS, Android
Support Live chat, Community, Docs · 24/7 Email, Phone
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML, 2FA ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations 10 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Laserfiche 0/7 · Generis CARA 6/7
Document versioning Not published ✓ (best)
Workflow automation Not published ✓ (best)
OCR-powered search Not published ✓ (best)
Retention policies Not published Not published
Audit trail Not published ✓ (best)
Electronic signatures Not published ✓ (best)
Mobile access Not published ✓ (best)
Our review
Pros
  • Granular permissions, security tags, audit trails, and version control
  • Workflow automation, forms, OCR, and AI-assisted document processing
  • Cloud, self-hosted, web, desktop, and mobile deployment options
  • Configurable workflows support single-step, conditional, and multi-outcome processes.
  • Audit trails cover changes, actions, workflows, versions, and lifecycles.
  • Web, mobile, API, and self-hosted options support varied operating models.
Cons
  • No free plan is available
  • Business+ requires a 500-user minimum
  • Advanced capabilities are distributed across paid tiers
  • Starting at £65 per user monthly, it has no free plan.
  • Enterprise+ uses custom scope, so its pricing is not published.
  • Its compliance-focused feature set may exceed simpler document management needs.
Our verdict

Laserfiche is an enterprise content management platform for organizations that need to capture, store, search, govern, and automate document-based work. It combines document repositories, advanced search, version history, OCR, metadata,…

Read the review →

Generis CARA is a cloud and self-hosted content, data, and business process management platform for regulated organisations. It combines document creation, editing, storage, controlled access, version numbering, archiving, records…

Read the review →
  1. LaserficheCloud Document Management Software 6.7From $42/user/mo (annual)
  2. Generis CARACloud Document Management Software 6.6From £65/user/mo

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Laserfiche — where it wins

    • Granular permissions, security tags, audit trails, and version control
    • Workflow automation, forms, OCR, and AI-assisted document processing
    • Cloud, self-hosted, web, desktop, and mobile deployment options

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Business+ requires a 500-user minimum
    • Advanced capabilities are distributed across paid tiers
  • Generis CARA — where it wins

    • Configurable workflows support single-step, conditional, and multi-outcome processes.
    • Audit trails cover changes, actions, workflows, versions, and lifecycles.
    • Web, mobile, API, and self-hosted options support varied operating models.

    Where it doesn't

    • Starting at £65 per user monthly, it has no free plan.
    • Enterprise+ uses custom scope, so its pricing is not published.
    • Its compliance-focused feature set may exceed simpler document management needs.
  • Laserfiche6.7/10 · From $42/user/mo (annual)

    A governance-focused document platform with automation, security controls, OCR, and AI extraction.

    Visit LaserficheFull verdict →
  • Generis CARA6.6/10 · From £65/user/mo

    A document platform for controlled workflows, auditability, signatures, and regulated operations.

    Visit Generis CARAFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update