Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

The Best Ruby Static Analysis Tools in 2026

We researched Ruby static analysis tools using information on their official websites, including pricing pages, plan tables, and product documentation. Rankings focus on how well each product analyzes Ruby code, value for money, and features verified in vendor materials, helping teams compare options for code quality, security, and type checking.

Our top picks

  1. Top ranked

    —/10

    Broad code analysis and workflow integrations for teams with enterprise SAST needs.

    Pricing on request

  2. Runner-up

    Snyk Code#2 of 21
    6.3/10

    Security-focused code scanning with IDE, pull-request, and CI/CD workflows.

    Free plan · paid from $25/mo

  3. Top-ranked free plan

    6.3/10

    Semantic queries and pull-request alerts for teams working in GitHub-centered workflows.

    Free plan · paid from $30/mo

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

The full ranking 21 tools, best first

21 tools
  1. OpenText Fortify SAST not yet scored

    Best forEnterprises needing comprehensive SAST

    Broad code analysis and workflow integrations for teams with enterprise SAST needs.

    • Automated fixes
    • Custom rules
    —not yet scored
    Visit OpenText
  2. Snyk Code

    Best forTeams prioritizing Ruby application security

    Security-focused code scanning with IDE, pull-request, and CI/CD workflows.

    • Automated fixes
    • Custom rules
    6.3/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Snyk Code
  3. Best forGitHub-centric teams needing semantic security analysis

    Semantic queries and pull-request alerts for teams working in GitHub-centered workflows.

    • Automated fixes
    • Custom rules
    6.3/10★★★☆☆
    Visit GitHub CodeQL
  4. Codacy

    Best forTeams seeking broad code quality and security checks

    Broad code and security checks, with pull-request controls and a free plan.

    • Security analysis
    • Custom rules
    Free plan · paid from $18/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial Our Codacy verdict → Visit CodacyFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #4 · $69/mo →
    7.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit Codacy
  5. Best forTeams combining code review, security, and dependencies

    A Ruby-capable analysis platform combining pull-request checks, security, and dependency review.

    Free plan · paid from $24/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial Our DeepSource verdict → Visit DeepSourceFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #5 · $59/mo →
    6.0/10★★★☆☆
    Visit DeepSource
  6. Best forTeams wanting configurable security rules and AI triage

    Semgrep pairs code scanning with AI triage, but Ruby-specific support is unclear.

    • Security analysis
    • Custom rules
    5.3/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Semgrep
  7. RuboCop not yet scored

    Best forRuby teams wanting an open-source linter

    A configurable Ruby linter with formatting, security checks, and CI/editor support.

    • Automated fixes
    • Custom rules
    Open source Our RuboCop verdict → Visit RuboCop
    —not yet scored
    Visit RuboCop
  8. Best forTeams wanting broad quality checks with a free tier

    A broad cloud analysis suite with a useful free tier and paid team controls.

    Free plan · paid from $20/mo Our Qlty Cloud verdict → Visit Qlty Cloud
    5.0/10★★☆☆☆
    Visit Qlty Cloud
  9. Brakeman not yet scored

    Best forRails teams focused on application security

    A Rails-focused security scanner with configurable checks and CI integrations.

    • Custom rules
    —not yet scored
    Visit Brakeman
  10. Reek not yet scored

    Best forRuby teams focused on code-smell detection

    Ruby-focused smell detection with configurable rules and extensive editor and CI integrations.

    Open source Our Reek verdict → Visit Reek
    —not yet scored
    Visit Reek
  11. Dawnscanner not yet scored

    Best forSmall Ruby apps needing free security scanning

    Local Ruby scanning with dependency checks and mitigation guidance, but no IDE or CI/CD support.

    —not yet scored
    Visit Dawnscanner
  12. Sorbet not yet scored

    Best forRuby teams adopting gradual static typing

    Sorbet adds gradual static type checking and editor support to Ruby projects.

    • Type checking
    • Self-hosted option
    —not yet scored
    Visit Sorbet
  13. Steep not yet scored

    Best forTeams using RBS signatures for Ruby type checks

    A focused, open-source Ruby type checker for teams working with RBS.

    • Type checking
    • Self-hosted option
    Free plan Our Steep verdict → Visit Steep
    —not yet scored
    Visit Steep
  14. RubyCritic not yet scored

    Best forRuby teams wanting combined code-smell reports

    Combines Reek, Flay, and Flog into configurable reports for Ruby projects.

    • Self-hosted option
    • Custom rules
    —not yet scored
    Visit RubyCritic
  15. Rails Best Practices not yet scored

    Best forRails teams checking common code practices

    A free, open-source Rails analyzer for configurable code-practice checks and reports.

    • Self-hosted option
    • Custom rules
    —not yet scored
    Visit site
  16. bundler-audit not yet scored

    Best forRuby teams auditing vulnerable gem dependencies

    A focused, open-source CLI for auditing vulnerable gems and insecure sources in Bundler lockfiles.

    —not yet scored
    Visit RubySec
  17. ERB Lint not yet scored

    Best forTeams linting ERB templates and embedded Ruby

    A free, self-hosted command-line linter focused on ERB and HTML templates.

    • Security analysis
    • Automated fixes
    • Self-hosted option
    —not yet scored
    Visit ERB Lint
  18. Flay not yet scored

    Best forRuby teams measuring duplicated code

    A focused, open-source Ruby tool for locating duplicated code across files.

    • Self-hosted option
    Free plan Our Flay verdict → Visit Flay
    —not yet scored
    Visit Flay
  19. Flog not yet scored

    Best forRuby teams measuring method and class complexity

    An open-source Ruby tool for scoring method and class complexity locally.

    • Self-hosted option
    Free plan Our Flog verdict → Visit Flog
    —not yet scored
    Visit Flog
  20. Slim-Lint not yet scored

    Best forTeams linting Slim templates in CI

    Configurable command-line linting for Slim templates, with local and CI workflows.

    • Self-hosted option
    • Custom rules
    —not yet scored
    Visit Slim-Lint
  21. TypeProf not yet scored

    Best forRuby 3.3+ developers exploring inferred types

    A focused, open-source Ruby type interpreter for developers evaluating inferred types.

    • Type checking
    • Self-hosted option
    —not yet scored
    Visit TypeProf

No tools match those filters.

Compare at a glance

#ToolFree planPaid fromSecurity analysisType checkingAutomated fixesCustom rulesScore
1OpenText Fortify SAST————YesYes—
2Snyk CodeYes$25/mo——YesYes6.3
3GitHub CodeQLYes$30/mo——YesYes6.3
4CodacyYes—Yes——Yes7.3
5DeepSourceYes—————6.0
6Semgrep AssistantYes—YesNo—Yes5.3
7RuboCop—None——YesYes—
8Qlty CloudYes$20/mo————5.0
9Brakeman—————Yes—
10Reek—None——No——
11Dawnscanner—None—————
12SorbetYesNoneNoYesNoNo—
13SteepYesNoneNoYesNo——
14RubyCriticYesNoneNoNoNoYes—
15Rails Best PracticesYesNoneNoNoNoYes—
16bundler-audit—None—————
17ERB LintYesNoneYes—YesYes—
18FlayYesNoneNoNoNoNo—
19FlogYesNoneNoNoNo——
20Slim-LintYesNoneNoNoNoYes—
21TypeProfYesNone—Yes———

Head-to-head All 21 comparisons →

Explore other topics All topics →

How we rank ruby static analysis tools

Every tool on this page was researched by iTechGuides Editors from its official website — pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. We rank on how well each one does this category's core job, what the free or entry plan includes, and where it falls short. Where we have enough verified facts, the score out of 10 is a rubric — job fit, value and how much we could verify — shown with its breakdown on every tool's page; a tool we have not verified enough to score yet shows its rank without a number. Scores are re-checked when a product changes its plans. Read the full editorial policy, or submit a tool we missed.

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026