Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Ruby Static Analysis Tools

OpenText Fortify SAST vs DeepSource

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText Fortify SAST #1 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools 9.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 6 features Visit OpenText
DeepSource #5 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools 8.1/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 6 features Visit DeepSource

OpenText Fortify SAST leads on 0 checks, DeepSource on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Fortify SAST · 9.1/10
  • Free planonly DeepSource
  • Free trialonly DeepSource
  • Most featuresOpenText Fortify SAST · 2 of 6

OpenText Fortify SAST scores higher on our rubric for ruby static analysis tools: 9.1 against 8.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.

OpenText Fortify SAST is the better fit for enterprises needing comprehensive SAST. DeepSource is the better fit for teams combining code review, security, and dependencies.

  • OpenText Fortify SAST fits best

    Enterprises needing comprehensive SAST

  • DeepSource fits best

    Teams combining code review, security, and dependencies

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Fortify SAST 9.1/10 Visit ↗ DeepSource 8.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.1
Ranking #1 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools #5 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools
Best for Enterprises needing comprehensive SAST Teams combining code review, security, and dependencies
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Phone, Docs Email, Tickets, Docs
Compliance PCI DSS, ISO 27001 SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 12 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Fortify SAST 2/6 · DeepSource 0/6
Security analysis Not checked yet Not checked yet
Type checking Not checked yet Not checked yet
Automated fixes ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Custom rules ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Hosted option Not checked yet Not checked yet
Self-hosted option Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
  • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
  • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation
  • Static analysis, pull-request checks, and security coverage across 18 languages
  • Dependency reachability, secrets detection, IaC review, and license policies
  • GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, API, webhooks, and self-hosting
Cons
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales
  • Configuration spans analysis, integrations, and scan management
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow Ruby-only tool
  • Secrets detection is limited to Team and Enterprise plans
  • Self-hosted deployment is available only with Enterprise
  • Advanced Team controls require paid per-user billing
Our verdict

OpenText Fortify SAST analyzes application source code, bytecode, and binaries to identify vulnerabilities during development. It is aimed at development, application security, and DevSecOps teams, particularly mid-market and enterprise…

Read the review →

DeepSource is a cloud code-review and application-security platform for developers and engineering teams, with Ruby support among 18 analyzed languages. It reviews commits and pull requests for code-quality issues, security…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Fortify SASTRuby Static Analysis Tools 9.1Pricing on request
  2. DeepSourceRuby Static Analysis Tools 8.1Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Fortify SAST — where it wins

    • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
    • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
    • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales
    • Configuration spans analysis, integrations, and scan management
    • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow Ruby-only tool

  • DeepSource — where it wins

    • Static analysis, pull-request checks, and security coverage across 18 languages
    • Dependency reachability, secrets detection, IaC review, and license policies
    • GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, API, webhooks, and self-hosting

    Where it doesn't

    • Secrets detection is limited to Team and Enterprise plans
    • Self-hosted deployment is available only with Enterprise
    • Advanced Team controls require paid per-user billing
  • OpenText Fortify SAST9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad code analysis and workflow integrations for teams with enterprise SAST needs.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • DeepSource8.1/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A Ruby-capable analysis platform combining pull-request checks, security, and dependency review.

    Visit DeepSourceFull verdict →

More comparisons

All ruby static analysis tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update