Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Ruby Static Analysis Tools

OpenText Fortify SAST vs RuboCop

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText Fortify SAST #1 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools 9.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 6 features Visit OpenText
RuboCop #7 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools 7.9/10 Open source ✓ 2 of 6 features Visit RuboCop

OpenText Fortify SAST leads on 0 checks, RuboCop on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Fortify SAST · 9.1/10

OpenText Fortify SAST scores higher on our rubric for ruby static analysis tools: 9.1 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.

OpenText Fortify SAST is the better fit for enterprises needing comprehensive SAST. RuboCop is the better fit for ruby teams wanting an open-source linter.

  • OpenText Fortify SAST fits best

    Enterprises needing comprehensive SAST

  • RuboCop fits best

    Ruby teams wanting an open-source linter

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Fortify SAST 9.1/10 Visit ↗ RuboCop 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 7.9
Ranking #1 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools #7 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools
Best for Enterprises needing comprehensive SAST Ruby teams wanting an open-source linter
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request Open source
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Support Phone, Docs Docs
Integrations 12 integrations 15 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Fortify SAST 2/6 · RuboCop 2/6
Security analysis Not checked yet Not checked yet
Type checking Not checked yet Not checked yet
Automated fixes ✓ ✓
Custom rules ✓ ✓
Hosted option Not checked yet Not checked yet
Self-hosted option Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
  • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
  • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation
  • Configurable cops, custom rules, plugins, and formatter extensions
  • Safe and unsafe autocorrection plus security-focused cops
  • Broad editor, pre-commit, and CI integration options
Cons
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales
  • Configuration spans analysis, integrations, and scan management
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow Ruby-only tool
  • Supports Ruby rather than multiple programming languages
  • Self-hosted deployment leaves infrastructure management to your team
  • Published support channel is limited to documentation
Our verdict

OpenText Fortify SAST analyzes application source code, bytecode, and binaries to identify vulnerabilities during development. It is aimed at development, application security, and DevSecOps teams, particularly mid-market and enterprise…

Read the review →

RuboCop is an open-source Ruby static code analyzer, linter, and formatter distributed as a Ruby gem. It checks code against configurable cops and community style guidelines, covering style, lint, metrics, naming, and security issues.…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Fortify SASTRuby Static Analysis Tools 9.1Pricing on request
  2. RuboCopRuby Static Analysis Tools 7.9Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Fortify SAST — where it wins

    • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
    • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
    • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales
    • Configuration spans analysis, integrations, and scan management
    • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow Ruby-only tool
  • RuboCop — where it wins

    • Configurable cops, custom rules, plugins, and formatter extensions
    • Safe and unsafe autocorrection plus security-focused cops
    • Broad editor, pre-commit, and CI integration options

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports Ruby rather than multiple programming languages
    • Self-hosted deployment leaves infrastructure management to your team
    • Published support channel is limited to documentation
  • OpenText Fortify SAST9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad code analysis and workflow integrations for teams with enterprise SAST needs.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • RuboCop7.9/10 · Open source

    A configurable Ruby linter with formatting, security checks, and CI/editor support.

    Visit RuboCopFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update