OpenText Fortify SAST vs RuboCop

OFOpenText Fortify SAST—Visit RuboCop—Visit

OF OpenText Fortify SAST #1 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools —/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 6 features Visit OpenText

vs

RuboCop #7 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools —/10 Open source ✓ 2 of 6 features Visit RuboCop

• OpenText Fortify SAST fits best

  Enterprises needing comprehensive SAST

• RuboCop fits best

  Ruby teams wanting an open-source linter

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	OFOpenText Fortify SAST —/10 Visit ↗	RuboCop —/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	—	—
Ranking	#1 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools	#7 in Ruby Static Analysis Tools
Best for	Enterprises needing comprehensive SAST	Ruby teams wanting an open-source linter
Pricing model	Paid	Free
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	Not published	Not published
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Self-hosted	Self-hosted
Support	Phone, Docs	Docs
Integrations	12 integrations	15 integrations
Built for	Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Fortify SAST 2/6 · RuboCop 2/6
Security analysis	Not published	Not published
Type checking	Not published	Not published
Automated fixes	✓	✓
Custom rules	✓	✓
Hosted option	Not published	Not published
Self-hosted option	Not published	Not published
Our review
Pros	Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation	Configurable cops, custom rules, plugins, and formatter extensions Safe and unsafe autocorrection plus security-focused cops Broad editor, pre-commit, and CI integration options
Cons	Pricing is handled through contact sales Configuration spans analysis, integrations, and scan management Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow Ruby-only tool	Supports Ruby rather than multiple programming languages Self-hosted deployment leaves infrastructure management to your team Published support channel is limited to documentation
Our verdict	OpenText Fortify SAST analyzes application source code, bytecode, and binaries to identify vulnerabilities during development. It is aimed at development, application security, and DevSecOps teams, particularly mid-market and enterprise… Read the review →	RuboCop is an open-source Ruby static code analyzer, linter, and formatter distributed as a Ruby gem. It checks code against configurable cops and community style guidelines, covering style, lint, metrics, naming, and security issues.… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• OpenText Fortify SAST — where it wins

  • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
  • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
  • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing is handled through contact sales
  • Configuration spans analysis, integrations, and scan management
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow Ruby-only tool

• RuboCop — where it wins

  • Configurable cops, custom rules, plugins, and formatter extensions
  • Safe and unsafe autocorrection plus security-focused cops
  • Broad editor, pre-commit, and CI integration options

  Where it doesn't

  • Supports Ruby rather than multiple programming languages
  • Self-hosted deployment leaves infrastructure management to your team
  • Published support channel is limited to documentation

• OFOpenText Fortify SAST—/10 · Pricing on request

  Broad code analysis and workflow integrations for teams with enterprise SAST needs.

  Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
• RuboCop—/10 · Open source

  A configurable Ruby linter with formatting, security checks, and CI/editor support.

  Visit RuboCopFull verdict →