Flog

At a glance

• Editor score
  Not yet scored
• Pricing
  Free plan
• Best for
  Ruby teams measuring method and class complexity
• Free plan
  Yes
• Paid from
  None
• Security analysis
  No
• Facts checked
  26 Sep 2026

• Where it wins

  • Scores classes and methods with ABC-style metrics and depth penalties
  • Readable pain reports surface complex code with scores and thresholds
  • Supports directory expansion and reusable argument files

• Where it doesn't

  • Focuses on complexity rather than security analysis or type checking
  • Does not provide autofix features
  • No hosted option; support is through documentation

Our verdict on Flog

Flog is an open-source command-line and library tool for measuring Ruby code complexity. It is aimed at Ruby developers and teams who want to identify complex methods and classes in local development or CI workflows. Distributed as a Ruby gem under the MIT license, it can process Ruby files and report where complexity is concentrated. Its scope is specific: Flog measures complexity rather than serving as a broader static analysis suite.

Its central metric combines ABC-style assignments, branches and conditionals with a compounding penalty for increasing code depth. Flog calculates scores for methods and classes, then produces a readable pain report with scores and thresholds to help direct attention to the most complex code. Directory processing is supported through automatic path expansion with path_expander. Arguments can also be persisted in an @file_of_args file, and intersecting file or directory paths can be subtracted. Ruby syntax errors and timeouts are handled, which matters when processing source files as part of a development or CI workflow.

Flog is a fit for teams seeking complexity measurements they can run themselves, including solo, small and mid-market teams. The published product details describe it as self-hosted, with no hosted option, and list documentation as its support channel. Its feature set does not include security analysis, type checking or autofix, so teams needing those capabilities should consider a broader analysis tool rather than expecting Flog to cover them. For Ruby developers whose priority is understanding method and class complexity, its metrics-focused approach keeps the task clear; for buyers wanting hosted analysis or a wider set of code-quality functions, it is a narrower choice.

Flog pricing

Flog fact sheet

Alternatives to Flog

• OFOpenText Fortify SASTBroad code analysis and workflow integrations for teams with enterprise SAST needs.—
• Snyk CodeSecurity-focused code scanning with IDE, pull-request, and CI/CD workflows.6.3
• GitHub CodeQLSemantic queries and pull-request alerts for teams working in GitHub-centered workflows.6.3

See all Flog alternatives →

Featured on iTechGuides

Flog is listed in our Ruby Static Analysis Tools directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/flog/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/flog.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes a score or a verdict. How we rank.