The Best AI Code Review Tools in 2026
We researched AI code review tools using official websites, including pricing pages, plan tables, and product documentation. Rankings reflect the category’s core job, value for money, and verified features, helping teams compare products that automatically analyze pull requests and code changes: AI code review tools.
Our top picks
-
Top ranked
CodeRabbit#1 of 478.9/10Deep automated review coverage with flexible code-host, IDE, and workflow integrations.
Free plan · 14-day trial
-
Runner-up
Greptile#2 of 478.8/10A context-rich AI reviewer with free access and GitHub/GitLab coverage.
Free plan · 14-day trial
-
Top-ranked free plan
Codacy#4 of 478.6/10AI pull-request review with broad language, security, coverage, and IDE support.
Free plan · 14-day trial
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
The full ranking 47 tools, best first
-
Best forTeams wanting deep review automation
Deep automated review coverage with flexible code-host, IDE, and workflow integrations.
- Security analysis
Free plan · 14-day trial Our CodeRabbit verdict → Visit CodeRabbitFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #1 · $149/mo →8.9/10★★★★☆Visit CodeRabbit -
Best forCodebase-context reviews with free access
A context-rich AI reviewer with free access and GitHub/GitLab coverage.
- Security analysis
Free plan · 14-day trial Our Greptile verdict → Visit GreptileFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #2 · $99/mo →8.8/10★★★★☆Visit Greptile -
Best forEnterprise security and private deployments
A strong fit for teams needing governed, private AI code review across multiple code hosts.
- Security analysis
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit Qodo -
Best forTeams prioritizing language and security coverage
AI pull-request review with broad language, security, coverage, and IDE support.
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
Free plan · 14-day trial Our Codacy verdict → Visit CodacyFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #4 · $69/mo →8.6/10★★★★☆Visit Codacy -
Best forSecurity-focused engineering teams
A security-focused code review platform with broad repository and application scanning.
Free plan · 14-day trial Our DeepSource verdict → Visit DeepSourceFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #5 · $59/mo →8.5/10★★★★☆Visit DeepSource -
Best forOpen-source teams needing maximum flexibility
A flexible, self-hosted review agent with broad code-host and LLM support.
- Security analysis
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit PR-Agent -
Best forTeams wanting broad enterprise code-host support
A broad code-review and security suite for teams across major code hosts.
- Security analysis
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit CodeAnt AI -
Best forTeams wanting review alongside coding assistance
A broad AI coding platform where GitHub review complements completion, chat, and agents.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Augment Code -
Best forTeams wanting broad, mature AI review
A broad AI review suite with security scanning, merge gates, analytics, and self-hosting.
- Security analysis
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit Sourcery -
Best forCross-platform teams with varied repositories
A flexible code review assistant for teams working across multiple repositories and code hosts.
- Security analysis
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Bito -
Best forGitHub teams wanting risk-scored automated fixes
Context-aware PR review and automated fixes, with plans from free to enterprise.
- Security analysis
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit CodeKang -
Best forBudget-conscious teams wanting self-hosting
A low-cost, self-hostable reviewer with broad code-host and LLM support.
- Security analysis
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit Mesrai -
Best forGitHub teams seeking low-cost specialist reviews
A flexible, low-cost GitHub reviewer with specialist panels and usage controls.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit PR Quorum -
Best forTeams needing broad platform coverage
A broad code-review platform with five Git hosts, workflow automation, and self-hosting.
- Security analysis
7.4/10★★★★☆Visit LiveReview -
Best forOpen-source teams wanting broad self-hosting
A broad, self-hosted reviewer for teams that want control over code and model infrastructure.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
7.3/10★★★★☆Visit Mira Code -
Best forGitHub teams wanting controlled review environments
Automated GitHub reviews with testing, controls, specialist agents, and usage-based pricing.
7.2/10★★★★☆Visit Ellipsis -
Best forTeams wanting self-hosted reviews across three hosts
Automated, context-aware reviews with self-hosting and workflows for three code hosts.
- Security analysis
7.1/10★★★★☆Visit Octopus -
Best forTeams preferring usage-based GitHub reviews
A GitHub-focused reviewer with deep analysis and usage-based pricing.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
7.0/10★★★★☆Visit Macroscope -
Best forTeams wanting multi-agent reviews in their CI
Six specialist agents review code locally and in CI, with plans from free to $29/month.
- Security analysis
6.9/10★★★☆☆Visit Revue -
Best forBudget-conscious teams wanting configurable PR reviews
Configurable AI pull-request reviews, with monthly review-unit limits on every plan.
- Security analysis
6.8/10★★★☆☆Visit Pullora -
Best forTeams seeking flexible deployment at a low entry price
Flexible AI pull request reviews, with a free self-hosted option and paid team features.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
6.7/10★★★☆☆Visit Kodus -
Best forGitHub teams wanting review plus coding agents
A GitHub-focused reviewer that adds custom agents, scans, fixes, and coding workflows.
- Security analysis
6.6/10★★★☆☆Visit Cubic -
Best forTeams wanting affordable paid PR reviews
Paid AI PR reviews with analytics, custom policies, and broad code-host support.
- Security analysis
6.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Korbit AI -
Best forTeams self-hosting extensible review pipelines
An extensible review pipeline for teams willing to operate it themselves.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
6.4/10★★★☆☆Visit AICodeReviewer -
Best forOpen-source teams focused on security review
A free, self-hosted reviewer with strong security analysis and configurable AI workflows.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
6.3/10★★★☆☆Visit Merlin -
Best forTeams needing broad workflow integrations
A broad review platform for teams that need integrations, automation, and custom analysis.
- Security analysis
6.2/10★★★☆☆Visit Baz -
Best forGitHub teams wanting verdict-based reviews
Verdict-based GitHub reviews with severity findings, fixes, and CI diagnostics.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
6.1/10★★★☆☆Visit Quellbot -
Best forTeams wanting free, self-hosted automated PR reviews
Free, open-source PR reviews with configurable checks and pluggable AI providers.
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit GitClaw -
Best forTeams wanting configurable multi-host reviews
A configurable, multi-host reviewer with security scoring and self-hosted deployment options.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
5.9/10★★★☆☆Visit ThinkReview -
Best forOrganizations requiring controlled self-hosting
A controlled self-hosted reviewer for teams needing provider choice and engineering context.
- Custom review rules
5.8/10★★★☆☆Visit Ironwood AI -
Best forTeams wanting evidence-backed GitHub review findings
GitHub pull-request reviews combine specialist analysis with evidence and testable checks.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
5.7/10★★★☆☆Visit Sigilix -
Best forGitHub users wanting provider flexibility
A flexible GitHub review action with broad model-provider support and a focused feature set.
- Custom review rules
5.6/10★★★☆☆Try CodePress Review -
Best forDevelopers wanting a simple free GitHub reviewer
A free, open-source GitHub Action with focused, configurable AI pull-request reviews.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit the project -
Best forGitHub and Bitbucket Cloud teams wanting learned rules
Automates pull-request reviews using extracted rules, with summaries, severity labels, and fix suggestions.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
5.4/10★★★☆☆Visit Revix -
Best forGitHub teams needing auditable self-hosted findings
A focused, auditable review bot for GitHub teams that want findings on their own infrastructure.
- Security analysis
5.3/10★★★☆☆Visit Sovri -
Best forSmall GitHub teams wanting checks and review analytics
Automatic GitHub reviews pair AI analysis with deterministic checks and team-convention context.
- Fix suggestions
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
5.2/10★★★☆☆Visit BugLens -
Best forGitHub teams wanting repository-context review
Context-rich GitHub pull request reviews, with paid plans priced per repository.
- Custom review rules
5.1/10★★★☆☆Visit Moraine -
Best forGitHub teams wanting automated issue resolution
Automates detailed GitHub pull request reviews and can resolve issues when requested.
- Security analysis
5.0/10★★☆☆☆Visit Squire -
Best forTeams needing runtime-based PR validation
Runtime-based PR validation with evidence-rich findings, focused on GitHub teams.
4.9/10★★☆☆☆Visit Ito -
Best forSmall GitHub teams focused on security review
GitHub-focused pull request reviews combine security findings, suggested changes, and dependency watch.
- Fix suggestions
- Security analysis
4.8/10★★☆☆☆Visit GitZoid -
Best forGitHub teams prioritizing review triage
A focused GitHub review layer for triaging risk in AI-assisted pull requests.
4.7/10★★☆☆☆Visit Distik -
Best forSmall GitHub teams wanting a minimal open-source bot
A self-hosted GitHub Action for teams that want configurable AI reviews in CI.
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
4.6/10★★☆☆☆Visit Enkii -
Best forSelf-hosters needing multi-forge basics
A self-hosted reviewer with broad forge coverage and flexible model endpoints.
4.5/10★★☆☆☆Visit Proval -
Best forTeams wanting pay-per-review simplicity
A focused GitHub reviewer with free access and pay-per-review usage.
- Custom review rules
4.4/10★★☆☆☆Visit Tenki -
Best forGitHub users wanting a free, self-hosted review workflow
A self-hosted GitHub review bot with inline findings and bring-your-own-model access.
4.3/10★★☆☆☆Visit Robin Review -
Best forVS Code users wanting manual GitHub PR reviews
A manual, preset-driven way to review GitHub pull requests from VS Code.
- Custom review rules
- Security analysis
4.1/10★★☆☆☆Visit PRPilot -
Best forLinux users wanting scrollable tiling
A capable Linux window manager, but not an AI code review tool.
0.3/10☆☆☆☆☆Visit niri
No tools match those filters.
Compare at a glance
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Security analysis | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CodeRabbit | Yes | $24/user/mo | Yes | 8.9 |
| 2 | Greptile | Yes | $30/seat/mo | Yes | 8.8 |
| 3 | Qodo | No | $30/mo | Yes | 8.7 |
| 4 | Codacy | Yes | $18/user/mo | Yes | 8.6 |
| 5 | DeepSource | Yes | 8.5 | ||
| 6 | PR-Agent | Yes | Free | Yes | 8.4 |
| 7 | CodeAnt AI | No | $20/user/mo | Yes | 8.3 |
| 8 | Augment Code | No | $20/mo | 8.1 | |
| 9 | Sourcery | Yes | $12/seat/mo | Yes | 7.9 |
| 10 | Bito | Yes | $12/seat/mo | Yes | 7.8 |
| 11 | CodeKang | Yes | $19/seat/mo | Yes | 7.7 |
| 12 | Mesrai | No | $6/mo | Yes | 7.6 |
| 13 | PR Quorum | Yes | $9.60/user/mo | Yes | 7.5 |
| 14 | LiveReview | Yes | Yes | 7.4 | |
| 15 | Mira | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.3 |
| 16 | Ellipsis | Yes | 7.2 | ||
| 17 | Octopus | Yes | Yes | 7.1 | |
| 18 | Macroscope | Yes | $0.01/unit usage-based | Yes | 7.0 |
| 19 | Revue | Yes | $9/mo | Yes | 6.9 |
| 20 | Pullora | Yes | $9/mo | Yes | 6.8 |
| 21 | Kodus | Yes | $10/user/mo | Yes | 6.7 |
| 22 | Cubic | Yes | Yes | 6.6 | |
| 23 | Korbit AI | No | $12/user/mo | Yes | 6.5 |
| 24 | AICodeReviewer | Free | Yes | 6.4 | |
| 25 | Merlin AI Code Review | Yes | Free | Yes | 6.3 |
| 26 | Baz | No | Yes | 6.2 | |
| 27 | Quellbot | Yes | $29/mo | Yes | 6.1 |
| 28 | GitClaw | Yes | Free | Yes | 6.0 |
| 29 | ThinkReview | Yes | Yes | 5.9 | |
| 30 | Ironwood AI | No | 5.8 | ||
| 31 | Sigilix Review | Yes | Yes | 5.7 | |
| 32 | CodePress Review | Free | 5.6 | ||
| 33 | AI Code Reviewer | Yes | Free | Yes | 5.5 |
| 34 | Revix | Yes | €20/seat/mo | 5.4 | |
| 35 | Sovri | Yes | Free | Yes | 5.3 |
| 36 | BugLens | Yes | $19/mo | Yes | 5.2 |
| 37 | Moraine | Yes | $14/unit/mo | 5.1 | |
| 38 | Squire | No | $20/user/mo | Yes | 5.0 |
| 39 | Ito | Yes | $40/user/mo | 4.9 | |
| 40 | GitZoid | No | $19/mo | Yes | 4.8 |
| 41 | Distik | No | $240/seat/yr | 4.7 | |
| 42 | Enkii | Yes | Free | Yes | 4.6 |
| 43 | Proval | Free | 4.5 | ||
| 44 | Tenki Code Reviewer | Yes | $200/mo | 4.4 | |
| 45 | Robin Review | Yes | Free | 4.3 | |
| 46 | PRPilot | Yes | 4.1 | ||
| 47 | niri | Yes | Free | 0.3 |
Head-to-head All 22 comparisons →
- CodeRabbit vs Codacy
- CodeRabbit vs DeepSource
- CodeRabbit vs CodeAnt AI
- CodeRabbit vs Augment Code
- Greptile vs Codacy
- Greptile vs DeepSource
- Greptile vs CodeAnt AI
- Greptile vs Augment Code
- Qodo vs Codacy
Explore other topics All topics →
- AI Tools 303 directories · 8,269 tools ranked AI Writing Tools · AI Video Generators · Text-to-Speech Software
- Web Hosting & Domains 275 directories · 6,107 tools ranked Shared Web Hosting · Managed Cloud Hosting · Dedicated Server Hosting
- Productivity 157 directories · 4,948 tools ranked Note-Taking Apps · Calendar Apps · Project Management Software
- Marketing 135 directories · 3,977 tools ranked SEO Tools · Influencer Marketing Platforms · Email Marketing Software
- Sales & CRM 152 directories · 4,161 tools ranked Real Estate CRM Software · CRM Software · Proposal Software
- Customer Service 55 directories · 1,547 tools ranked Chatbot Builders · Knowledge Base Software · Call Center Software
How we rank AI code review tools
Every tool on this page was researched by iTechGuides Editors from its official website — pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. We rank on how well each one does this category's core job, what the free or entry plan includes, and where it falls short. Where we have enough verified facts, the score out of 10 is a rubric — job fit, value and how much we could verify — shown with its breakdown on every tool's page; a tool we have not verified enough to score yet shows its rank without a number. Scores are re-checked when a product changes its plans. Read the full editorial policy, or submit a tool we missed.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update