Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Macroscope

Freemium#18 of 47 in AI Code Review Tools

Macroscope: A GitHub-focused reviewer with deep analysis and usage-based pricing. Ranked #18 of 47 in AI Code Review Tools by our editors (7.0/10); pricing: Free plan; best for teams preferring usage-based GitHub reviews.

7.0/10Editor score
Macroscope7.0 Visit Macroscope

At a glance

  • Editor score
    7.0 / 10
  • Pricing
    Free plan
  • Best for
    Teams preferring usage-based GitHub reviews
  • Free plan
    Yes
  • Paid from
    $0.01/unit usage-based
  • Security analysis
    Yes
  • Facts checked
    20 Sep 2026
Macroscope screenshot
  • Where it wins

    • AST and reference-graph analysis for codebase-aware reviews
    • Custom checks, suggested fixes, and merge-gating agents
    • Spend caps and exclusions for repositories or files
  • Where it doesn't

    • Supports GitHub rather than multiple code-hosting platforms
    • Cloud deployment may not suit teams requiring self-hosting
    • Usage costs vary by review mode, diff size, commits, or credits

Our verdict on Macroscope

Macroscope is an AI code review platform for engineering teams working with GitHub. It automatically reviews pull requests, analyzes codebase relationships through AST-based representations and reference graphs, and identifies bugs, security issues, and regressions. It also suggests fixes and generates pull-request summaries. The free plan and usage-based model make it relevant to teams that want to align cost with review activity rather than pay by seat.

Pricing is divided by review mode and usage type. Budget Code Review costs $0.025 per KB of diff reviewed and provides automated pull-request review. Balanced Code Review costs $0.05 per KB and adds the default detection mode, while Precise Code Review costs $0.06 per KB and Ultra Code Review costs $0.2 per KB; each includes automated pull-request review. Status costs $0.05 per commit for commit summaries, sprint reports and weekly digests, and project classification. Agent costs $0.01 per credit and can write code and ship pull requests through Slack, GitHub, and the API. Enterprise offers discounted pricing for longer commitments, priority support, and custom MSA and DPA agreements.

The standout capability is the combination of codebase analysis, reference graphs, custom markdown-defined checks, and merge-gating GitHub Check Run Agents. Spend caps and repository or file exclusions provide controls for managing usage, while integrations span Slack, Jira, Linear, Sentry, PostHog, LaunchDarkly, Amplitude, BigQuery, Google Cloud Logging, and MCP. Macroscope suits teams that want GitHub-native review automation with configurable analysis and connected workflows. Teams needing a non-GitHub host or a deployment model other than cloud should choose an alternative.

Your product? Our editors can test Macroscope in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

Macroscope pricing

Plans Free planFreemium A usable free plan; paid tiers unlock the limits above. Prices checked 20 Sep 2026.
See plans on macroscope.com

All 7 Macroscope plans and prices →

Macroscope fact sheet

Free planYes
Paid from$0.01/unit usage-based
Security analysisYes
Custom review rulesYes
Fix suggestionsYes
Deployment modelCloud
Review triggerBoth
Code hostsGitHub
SARIF exportNot verified
DeploymentCloud
PlatformsWeb
Compliance & securitySOC 2
SupportEmail, Docs
Built forSmall business, Mid-market, Enterprise (editorial estimate)
Integrations11 integrations: GitHub, Slack, Jira, Linear, Sentry, PostHog …
PricingFree plan (source)
Websitemacroscope.com
Facts checked20 Sep 2026

Macroscope integrations

Macroscope lists 11 integrations on its own site.

  • GitHub
  • Slack
  • Jira
  • Linear
  • Sentry
  • PostHog
  • LaunchDarkly
  • Amplitude
  • BigQuery
  • Google Cloud Logging
  • MCP

Alternatives to Macroscope

See all Macroscope alternatives →

Used Macroscope? Be the first to review it

The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used Macroscope for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.

Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears

Reviews come only from verified accounts. Sign in or create an account first — your e-mail is never shown.

Your rating

0 characters · at least 80, up to 3,000

Posted from your verified account. Reviews appear after an editor reads them, usually within two working days.

Featured on iTechGuides

Featured on iTechGuides — Macroscope 7.0/10

Macroscope is listed in our AI Code Review Tools directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.

<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/macroscope/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/macroscope.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update