Best Codeberg Alternatives in 2026
The top Codeberg alternatives are Bitbucket, Perforce TeamHub and AWS CodeCommit: 15 git hosting services our editors would look at instead of Codeberg, in our ranking order.
Codeberg: A capable free Git host for open-source teams that can work within hosted CI limits. Where it falls short: hosted CI requires manual approval and has resource limitations.
Switching from Codeberg? For most git hosting services buyers the best Codeberg alternative is Bitbucket, built for teams wanting broad hosted Git workflows. On a budget, SourceHut starts at $4/user/mo. Perforce TeamHub offers the most artifact storage (1 GB).
Why People Look for a Codeberg Alternative
- Hosted CI requires manual approval and has resource limitations
- Combined packages, LFS and attachments cite a 1.5 GiB threshold
- Its integration ecosystem is narrower than broader Git hosting services
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallBitbucket8.9
Teams wanting broad hosted Git workflows
Visit Bitbucket - Lowest priceSourceHut7.7
Paid plans from $4/user/mo
Visit SourceHut - Best free optionBitbucket8.9
Has a free plan
Visit Bitbucket - Most artifact storagePerforce TeamHub8.7
1 GB
Visit Perforce TeamHub
All 15 Codeberg Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forTeams wanting broad hosted Git workflows
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 8.9 vs 7.3
A broad Git hosting service for teams that want repositories, reviews, automation, and Atlassian integration.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Bitbucket -
Best forMixed-repository enterprise environments
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 7.3
A broad repository platform for enterprises managing mixed source-code environments.
- Built-in wiki
8.7/10★★★★☆Try Perforce TeamHub -
Best forAWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 8.5 vs 7.3
A low-cost private Git service for teams already invested in AWS.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit AWS CodeCommit -
Best forTeams needing hosting plus project planning
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 8.4 vs 7.3
A paid Git host for teams that want code management and planning in one workspace.
- Built-in wiki
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Assembla -
Best forDevelopers building self-hosted Git infrastructure
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 8.2 vs 7.3
A mature, flexible foundation for teams building their own Git infrastructure.
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Git -
Best forCursor-centered development teams
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 8.1 vs 7.3
Git hosting for teams building around Cursor's agents and workflows.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Cursor Origin -
Best forTeams prioritizing governance and security
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 8.0 vs 7.3
A governance-focused Git service for teams already invested in Harness.
- Built-in CI/CD
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Harness -
Best forEnterprise self-hosted code review
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 7.9 vs 7.3
A specialized enterprise platform for self-hosted, multi-repository code review.
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit RhodeCode -
Best forUbuntu and open-source project maintainers
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 7.8 vs 7.3
A strong fit for Ubuntu projects, but its specialized workflow narrows broader Git hosting appeal.
- Built-in CI/CD
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Launchpad -
Best forUnix-oriented teams needing Git and Mercurial
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 7.7 vs 7.3
A focused Git and Mercurial forge for Unix-oriented, email-friendly workflows.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit SourceHut -
Best forFree Git hosting with CI and packages
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 7.6 vs 7.3
A broad free GitLab-based host for repositories, CI, Pages, and packages.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit GitGud.io -
Best forSelf-hosters wanting a simple open-source forge
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 7.5 vs 7.3
A simple open-source forge for teams that want to operate Git themselves.
- Built-in wiki
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit GitBucket -
Best forSelf-hosters needing a broad lightweight forge
- Better than Codeberg:
- Editor score 7.4 vs 7.3
A broad self-hosted forge with repositories, collaboration tools, and flexible authentication.
- Built-in wiki
7.4/10★★★★☆Visit Gogs -
Best forSelf-hosted Git and Mercurial teams
A focused, open-source choice for teams hosting Git and Mercurial on their own servers.
7.2/10★★★★☆Visit Kallithea -
Best forTeams wanting a feature-rich Git forge
A broad Git forge with a useful free plan and storage flexibility for teams.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.0/10★★★★☆Visit GitForge
Codeberg Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to Codeberg?
Bitbucket: #1 in our Git Hosting Services ranking, with an editor score of 8.9 out of 10. A broad Git hosting service for teams that want repositories, reviews, automation, and Atlassian integration.
Is there a free alternative to Codeberg?
Yes. Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit, Git, Harness Code Repository and Launchpad have a free plan or a free tier (11 of the 15 alternatives on this page).
What is the cheapest paid alternative to Codeberg?
Of the alternatives here that publish a price, SourceHut starts lowest, at $4/user/mo.
Why do people look for Codeberg alternatives?
Hosted CI requires manual approval and has resource limitations; Combined packages, LFS and attachments cite a 1.5 GiB threshold; Its integration ecosystem is narrower than broader Git hosting services.
Which Codeberg alternative has the most artifact storage?
Perforce TeamHub, with 1 GB.
How do I switch from Codeberg?
Export your data from Codeberg (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Codeberg.
How to Switch from Codeberg
- Export your data from Codeberg (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Codeberg.
Codeberg vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Built-in CI/CD | SSO support | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Codeberg | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.3 | |
| 1 | Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Saml | 8.9 | |
| 2 | Perforce TeamHub | No | No | Saml | 8.7 | |
| 3 | AWS CodeCommit | Yes | No | 8.5 | ||
| 4 | Assembla | No | $12.50/user/mo | No | Saml | 8.4 |
| 5 | Git | Yes | Free | 8.2 | ||
| 6 | Cursor Origin | No | $20/user/mo | No | Saml_scim | 8.1 |
| 7 | Harness Code Repository | Yes | Yes | Saml_scim | 8.0 | |
| 8 | RhodeCode Enterprise | No | $75/user/yr | 7.9 | ||
| 9 | Launchpad | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.8 | |
| 10 | SourceHut | Yes | $4/user/mo | Yes | 7.7 | |
| 11 | GitGud.io | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.6 | |
| 12 | GitBucket | Free | No | None | 7.5 | |
| 13 | Gogs | Free | None | 7.4 | ||
| 14 | Kallithea | Free | 7.2 | |||
| 15 | GitForge | Yes | $12/user/mo | Yes | Saml_scim | 7.0 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update