Best SourceHut Alternatives in 2026
The top SourceHut alternatives are Bitbucket, Perforce TeamHub and AWS CodeCommit: 15 git hosting services our editors would look at instead of SourceHut, in our ranking order.
SourceHut: A focused Git and Mercurial forge for Unix-oriented, email-friendly workflows. Where it falls short: no free plan for hosting your own projects.
Switching from SourceHut? For most git hosting services buyers the best SourceHut alternative is Bitbucket, built for teams wanting broad hosted Git workflows. Perforce TeamHub offers the most artifact storage (1 GB).
Why People Look for a SourceHut Alternative
- No free plan for hosting your own projects
- Integrations center on a relatively narrow set of tools
- The hosted service is currently described as a public alpha
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallBitbucket8.9
Teams wanting broad hosted Git workflows
Visit Bitbucket - Lowest priceGitForge7.0
Paid plans from $12/user/mo
Visit GitForge - Best free optionBitbucket8.9
Has a free plan
Visit Bitbucket - Most artifact storagePerforce TeamHub8.7
1 GB
Visit Perforce TeamHub
All 15 SourceHut Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forTeams wanting broad hosted Git workflows
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 8.9 vs 7.7
A broad Git hosting service for teams that want repositories, reviews, automation, and Atlassian integration.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Bitbucket -
Best forMixed-repository enterprise environments
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 7.7
A broad repository platform for enterprises managing mixed source-code environments.
- Built-in wiki
8.7/10★★★★☆Try Perforce TeamHub -
Best forAWS-centered teams needing inexpensive private Git
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 8.5 vs 7.7
A low-cost private Git service for teams already invested in AWS.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit AWS CodeCommit -
Best forTeams needing hosting plus project planning
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 8.4 vs 7.7
A paid Git host for teams that want code management and planning in one workspace.
- Built-in wiki
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Assembla -
Best forDevelopers building self-hosted Git infrastructure
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 8.2 vs 7.7
A mature, flexible foundation for teams building their own Git infrastructure.
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Git -
Best forCursor-centered development teams
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 8.1 vs 7.7
Git hosting for teams building around Cursor's agents and workflows.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Cursor Origin -
Best forTeams prioritizing governance and security
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 8.0 vs 7.7
A governance-focused Git service for teams already invested in Harness.
- Built-in CI/CD
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Harness -
Best forEnterprise self-hosted code review
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 7.9 vs 7.7
A specialized enterprise platform for self-hosted, multi-repository code review.
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit RhodeCode -
Best forUbuntu and open-source project maintainers
- Better than SourceHut:
- Editor score 7.8 vs 7.7
A strong fit for Ubuntu projects, but its specialized workflow narrows broader Git hosting appeal.
- Built-in CI/CD
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Launchpad -
Best forFree Git hosting with CI and packages
A broad free GitLab-based host for repositories, CI, Pages, and packages.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit GitGud.io -
Best forSelf-hosters wanting a simple open-source forge
A simple open-source forge for teams that want to operate Git themselves.
- Built-in wiki
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit GitBucket -
Best forSelf-hosters needing a broad lightweight forge
A broad self-hosted forge with repositories, collaboration tools, and flexible authentication.
- Built-in wiki
7.4/10★★★★☆Visit Gogs -
Best forOpen-source teams seeking free hosting
A capable free Git host for open-source teams that can work within hosted CI limits.
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.3/10★★★★☆Visit Codeberg -
Best forSelf-hosted Git and Mercurial teams
A focused, open-source choice for teams hosting Git and Mercurial on their own servers.
7.2/10★★★★☆Visit Kallithea -
Best forTeams wanting a feature-rich Git forge
A broad Git forge with a useful free plan and storage flexibility for teams.
- Merge queue
- Built-in CI/CD
- Built-in wiki
7.0/10★★★★☆Visit GitForge
SourceHut Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to SourceHut?
Bitbucket: #1 in our Git Hosting Services ranking, with an editor score of 8.9 out of 10. A broad Git hosting service for teams that want repositories, reviews, automation, and Atlassian integration.
Is there a free alternative to SourceHut?
Yes. Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit, Git, Harness Code Repository and Launchpad have a free plan or a free tier (11 of the 15 alternatives on this page).
What is the cheapest paid alternative to SourceHut?
Of the alternatives here that publish a price, GitForge starts lowest, at $12/user/mo.
Why do people look for SourceHut alternatives?
No free plan for hosting your own projects; Integrations center on a relatively narrow set of tools; The hosted service is currently described as a public alpha.
Which SourceHut alternative has the most artifact storage?
Perforce TeamHub, with 1 GB.
How do I switch from SourceHut?
Export your data from SourceHut (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel SourceHut.
How to Switch from SourceHut
- Export your data from SourceHut (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel SourceHut.
SourceHut vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Built-in CI/CD | SSO support | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | SourceHut | Yes | $4/user/mo | Yes | 7.7 | |
| 1 | Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Saml | 8.9 | |
| 2 | Perforce TeamHub | No | No | Saml | 8.7 | |
| 3 | AWS CodeCommit | Yes | No | 8.5 | ||
| 4 | Assembla | No | $12.50/user/mo | No | Saml | 8.4 |
| 5 | Git | Yes | Free | 8.2 | ||
| 6 | Cursor Origin | No | $20/user/mo | No | Saml_scim | 8.1 |
| 7 | Harness Code Repository | Yes | Yes | Saml_scim | 8.0 | |
| 8 | RhodeCode Enterprise | No | $75/user/yr | 7.9 | ||
| 9 | Launchpad | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.8 | |
| 10 | GitGud.io | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.6 | |
| 11 | GitBucket | Free | No | None | 7.5 | |
| 12 | Gogs | Free | None | 7.4 | ||
| 13 | Codeberg | Yes | Free | Yes | 7.3 | |
| 14 | Kallithea | Free | 7.2 | |||
| 15 | GitForge | Yes | $12/user/mo | Yes | Saml_scim | 7.0 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update