iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The Lippisch P.13a and Me 163 Komet were not two versions of the same production fighter. The P.13a was a 1943 paper design for a tailless delta interceptor using a proposed ramjet and coal-based fuel; the Me 163 was a flown, operational rocket aircraft that traded range and endurance for an extremely fast climb to bomber altitude. The P.13a never reached a verified flight, while the Komet entered Luftwaffe service in May 1944 and achieved real speed records, but its hazardous propulsion, short powered flight, landing system and limited combat effectiveness sharply restricted its value.
At a glance: two different answers to the interceptor problem
| Category | Lippisch P.13a | Me 163 Komet |
|---|---|---|
| Historical status | Projected design study begun at the Luftfahrt-Forschungsanstalt Wien in 1943; no completed or flown P.13a is documented by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. | Operational rocket interceptor; the Smithsonian identifies it as the world’s first operational fighter powered by a liquid-fueled rocket engine, entering service in May 1944. |
| Configuration | Tailless, sharply swept delta intended for very high-speed interception. | Tailless, swept-wing interceptor developed from Lippisch’s earlier research and built for rapid climbs and short attacks. |
| Propulsion | Proposed ramjet with few moving parts, burning coal dust and heavy oil or gasoline. | Liquid-fuel Walter rocket engine. |
| Endurance evidence | No demonstrated flight endurance. | About eight minutes of powered endurance in the Me 163B account recorded by Museums Victoria. |
| Speed evidence | No verified flight speed. | The Me 163 V1 reached 1,004.5 kph (623.8 mph) on 2 October 1941, according to the Smithsonian. |
| Production evidence | Never reached production. | The National Museum of the United States Air Force records 279 Me 163Bs delivered by the end of World War II; the National Air and Space Museum gives an approximate total of 300 Komets completed. |
| Combat record | None. | JG 400 is credited by the U.S. Air Force museum with nine kills while losing 14 aircraft. |
The central comparison is therefore operational rather than a simple speed contest. The P.13a represented a forward-looking attempt at sustained, very-high-speed interception. The Komet was an emergency weapon designed to reach bomber formations quickly, make a brief attack, and glide back to an airfield after its propellant was exhausted.
What the P.13a was intended to be
A 1943 ramjet delta study
Alexander Lippisch began work on the P.13a at the Luftfahrt-Forschungsanstalt Wien in 1943. The design was tailless and sharply swept into a delta planform, an arrangement intended to remain manageable at speeds far beyond those of conventional propeller fighters. The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum describes the project as an attempt to obtain supersonic performance.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteThe propulsion concept was a ramjet. Unlike a piston engine or a turbojet, a ramjet has few moving parts and depends on the aircraft’s forward motion to compress incoming air before combustion. The P.13a proposal called for coal dust as fuel, with heavy oil or gasoline also identified as possible fuels. That choice reflected wartime pressure on aviation gasoline supplies as well as the desire for a simple engine, but it also introduced unresolved questions about fuel handling, combustion stability, intake performance and operation from a standing start.
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
A design, not a prototype
No completed or flown P.13a is documented in the Smithsonian record. That distinction controls every performance comparison: there is no verified P.13a top speed, climb rate, endurance figure or combat result. Drawings and projected propulsion concepts can show what Lippisch hoped to achieve, but they cannot establish that the aircraft would have met those targets in the air.
It is consequently incorrect to call the P.13a a faster Komet, a production successor or an operational interceptor. It was a paper proposal aimed at a different operating profile—high-speed flight sustained by a ramjet—rather than the Komet’s short, rocket-powered sortie.
What the Me 163 Komet actually achieved
The rocket-powered operational branch
The Me 163 was the practical, fielded branch of Lippisch’s tailless research. Its liquid-fuel Walter rocket produced exceptional acceleration and climb, and the aircraft’s performance was demonstrated rather than merely projected. The Smithsonian records a speed of 1,004.5 kph (623.8 mph) for the Me 163 V1 on 2 October 1941. That is a measured result for a specific test aircraft and date, not a verified P.13a figure.
The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum states that “The Komet became the world’s first operational fighter aircraft powered by a liquid-fueled rocket engine in May 1944.” The Me 163B was therefore a genuine service aircraft, but operational status did not make it a conventional day fighter. Its mission was to climb rapidly toward high-altitude bomber formations, attack during a narrow window, and return as a powerless glider.
Why its speed did not translate into long missions
Rocket propulsion supplied thrust without requiring atmospheric oxygen to be carried through a compressor, enabling extraordinary acceleration and climb. The cost was propellant consumption. The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force summarizes the trade-off this way: “Although the Komet’s rocket engine gave it a exceptional climb rate, range was severely limited by its high fuel consumption.” Museums Victoria gives about eight minutes of powered endurance for the Me 163B account.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
After the propellant was gone, the aircraft had to glide. That made fuel planning, attack timing and the return route critical. A Komet that missed its target, encountered bad weather or was forced away from its base could not simply throttle back and continue searching. The powered phase was brief, and every minute spent climbing, maneuvering or attacking reduced the margin for the glide home.
Propulsion comparison: ramjet theory versus rocket urgency
| Issue | P.13a ramjet proposal | Me 163 rocket |
|---|---|---|
| How thrust was expected to be produced | Air entering the intake would be compressed by forward motion and mixed with fuel for combustion. | A liquid-fuel rocket generated thrust independently of atmospheric oxygen. |
| Fuel named in the historical record | Coal dust, heavy oil or gasoline. | Liquid propellants for the Walter rocket; the Komet’s operational handling involved corrosive and explosive substances. |
| Moving parts | Proposed as a system with few moving parts. | A working rocket installation that delivered high thrust but demanded specialized ground handling. |
| Start and recovery implications | A ramjet concept would have required a way to reach useful forward speed before producing effective thrust; no operational P.13a procedure is documented. | Powered takeoff and climb were followed by a powerless glide, a jettisonable trolley and skid landing. |
| Primary advantage | Potential for sustained high-speed interception if the engine, fuel and airframe worked as intended. | Immediate acceleration and climb to bomber altitude. |
| Primary limitation | Unproven aircraft, engine integration and flight performance. | Very short powered endurance, restricted range and dangerous propellant operations. |
This difference explains why the P.13a should not be ranked by simply extrapolating from the Komet’s record speed. A ramjet could, in principle, support a longer high-speed run once the aircraft was moving, while the rocket gave the Komet its striking climb performance immediately. They addressed different parts of the interception problem.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Airframe and flight profile
The shared tailless-delta lineage
Both projects belong to Lippisch’s continuing investigation of tailless, swept and delta-like aircraft. Removing a conventional tail and using a sharply swept planform could reduce drag and preserve control authority at high speed, but it also placed demanding requirements on stability, control surfaces and low-speed handling. The Komet proved that this family of layouts could be made to fly in combat service; it did not prove that every later Lippisch design would work.
The P.13a was intended as a new ramjet-powered interceptor, not simply a Komet with a different engine. Its shape and propulsion were conceived together around a higher-speed objective. Because the aircraft never flew, aerodynamic predictions remain predictions.
The Komet’s launch, attack and return cycle
The Me 163’s operational burden extended beyond the engine. Crews used a jettisonable trolley for takeoff, then landed on a skid after the aircraft had glided back. The landing system reduced conventional undercarriage weight, but it left the aircraft vulnerable during approach and touchdown. The return glide also made the Komet exposed when it was no longer powered.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Ground personnel handled corrosive and explosive propellants. That hazard affected fueling, maintenance, storage, dispersal and emergency procedures. A performance advantage in the air therefore came with a substantial logistics and safety penalty on the ground.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPerformance: what can be measured and what cannot
Verified Komet data
- 1,004.5 kph (623.8 mph): Me 163 V1 speed record on 2 October 1941, as recorded by the Smithsonian Institution.
- About eight minutes: powered endurance for the Me 163B account cited by Museums Victoria.
- Exceptional climb: repeatedly identified by the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force as the aircraft’s defining performance strength.
- Severely limited range: the same museum attributes the limitation to high fuel consumption.
Numbers that do not exist for the P.13a
- No verified P.13a flight speed.
- No demonstrated climb rate.
- No measured endurance or range.
- No production total or combat record.
Any table or article that assigns the P.13a a precise maximum speed is presenting an estimate, not a flight-tested fact. The historical record establishes the design goal—supersonic performance—not an achieved result.
Production and service scale
The Me 163 was produced in wartime numbers, but those numbers were small compared with conventional fighter programs. The National Museum of the United States Air Force records 279 Me 163B aircraft delivered by the end of World War II. The National Air and Space Museum separately summarizes production as about 300 Komets completed. These figures are not necessarily contradictory: one is a count of Me 163Bs delivered, while the other is an approximate total for Komets, potentially reflecting a different counting scope.
The P.13a had no production run. It remained a design study, so there is no equivalent “delivered” figure and no basis for comparing manufacturing efficiency, sortie generation or fleet availability.
Combat effectiveness and operational cost
What JG 400’s record shows
The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force credits Jagdgeschwader 400, the Komet unit, with nine kills while losing 14 aircraft. Those figures do not erase the aircraft’s remarkable climb or speed, but they show why technical performance alone did not make it a decisive interceptor. The Komet had to find bombers during a short powered window, make attacks with limited ammunition opportunities, survive the return glide and land on its skid while its airfield remained vulnerable.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
Why the P.13a cannot receive a combat rating
The P.13a never entered a squadron, so questions about kill ratio, sortie reliability and pilot workload remain hypothetical. Its proposed ramjet may have offered a route to sustained high-speed interception, but the design did not pass through the flight-test and logistics stages needed to validate that promise.
The fairest conclusion is not that one aircraft “won” a head-to-head contest. The Komet delivered a real but narrow capability under wartime pressure. The P.13a represented a more ambitious propulsion and speed direction that was never validated in an aircraft.
Why Germany pursued both concepts
Immediate defense versus future speed
Germany’s air-defense problem demanded an aircraft that could reach bomber altitude quickly. The rocket Komet answered that immediate requirement with extraordinary acceleration, even though its range and endurance were poor. A ramjet delta such as the P.13a addressed a longer-term question: whether a simple, high-speed engine and a sharply swept airframe could sustain supersonic interception more effectively than a short-burn rocket.
Different technology risks
The Komet’s risk was operational: dangerous propellant chemistry, limited powered time, a trolley launch, a skid landing and a vulnerable glide. The P.13a’s risk was developmental: an unflown aircraft, an unproven ramjet installation and fuel concepts that had not been demonstrated in service. Pursuing both was therefore not redundant. One was a fieldable emergency system; the other was an exploratory study of what might follow.
Why the projects did not merge into one aircraft
Changing from a rocket to a ramjet would not have been a simple engine substitution. Intake design, fuel storage, combustion, acceleration to ramjet operating speed, airframe loads and mission planning would all have changed. The Komet’s layout was optimized around a brief powered climb and glide recovery, while the P.13a was aimed at a different high-speed regime. The documented record does not show a flying P.13a derived directly from the Komet.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
Postwar continuation: the DM-1, not a flying P.13a
Lippisch’s sharply swept delta research continued after the war through the DM-1. Construction began in 1944, the glider was completed after the war, and NACA tested it in 1946, according to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. The DM-1 provided a flyable vehicle for studying the aerodynamic configuration, but it should not be mislabeled as a completed P.13a prototype.
The Smithsonian record says Lippisch hoped eventually to explore speeds up to Mach 6. That was an objective for future research, not an achieved DM-1 flight result. The DM-1’s significance is that it preserved and tested the delta research direction in a real airframe after the P.13a itself had remained on paper.
Common misconceptions corrected
“The P.13a was a faster Komet.”
Not as a documented fact. The Komet has a measured 1,004.5 kph record for the V1. The P.13a has no verified flight record, only a design goal for supersonic performance.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
“Both aircraft were operational interceptors.”
Only the Me 163 reached operational service. The P.13a was a projected design study.
“The Komet was simply a success because it was so fast.”
Its speed and climb were genuine advantages, but high fuel consumption limited range, powered endurance was about eight minutes in the cited Me 163B account, and JG 400’s nine kills versus 14 aircraft lost illustrates the operational cost.
“The DM-1 proves the P.13a flew.”
No. The DM-1 was a separate postwar test glider associated with Lippisch’s delta research. Its 1946 NACA testing does not convert the unbuilt P.13a into a flown aircraft.
How to interpret the comparison
Use the Me 163 when discussing demonstrated wartime capability: it flew, set a documented speed record, entered service and forced pilots and ground crews to work around severe range, fuel and landing constraints. Use the P.13a when discussing the boundary between aerodynamic research and deployable hardware: it shows how Lippisch pursued a ramjet-powered, high-speed delta but offers no flight data with which to verify the concept.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
In short, the Komet was an operational rocket sprint, while the P.13a was an unbuilt ramjet proposal for a more sustained high-speed mission. Their common Lippisch lineage makes the comparison revealing, but their status, propulsion and evidence base are fundamentally different.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
