Zellij vs RMUX

Zellij9.4Visit RMUX8.7Visit

Higher score Zellij #1 in Terminal Multiplexers 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Zellij

vs

RMUX #6 in Terminal Multiplexers 8.7/10 Open source ✓ 2 of 4 features Visit RMUX

• Zellij fits best

  Feature-rich cross-platform terminal multiplexing

• RMUX fits best

  Automation-heavy multiplexing teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Zellij 9.4/10 Visit ↗	RMUX 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.4	8.7
Ranking	#1 in Terminal Multiplexers	#6 in Terminal Multiplexers
Best for	Feature-rich cross-platform terminal multiplexing	Automation-heavy multiplexing teams
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Open source
Free plan	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Self-hosted	Desktop, Browser extension
Platforms	Web, Windows, macOS, Linux	Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support	Docs	Docs, Community
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Zellij 4/4 · RMUX 2/4
Session synchronization	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Collaboration features	✓	✓
Custom pane layouts	✓	✓
Plugins or extensions	✓ (best)	—
Specs
Persistence scope	Local	Local
Access platforms	Linux, macOS, Windows terminals; browser web client	Linux, macOS, Windows, local CLI, browser via Web Share, Rust/Python/TypeScript SDKs
Maximum sessions	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Runs across Linux, macOS, Windows, and the web Combines panes, tabs, layouts, floating, and stacked panes Adds plugins, session resurrection, and collaborative sharing	tmux-compatible CLI with more than 90 commands Rust, Python, and TypeScript SDKs for terminal automation Native Linux, macOS, and Windows support without WSL
Cons	Session resurrection is local rather than a hosted persistence layer Browser access requires an optional self-hosted web client Does not include AI features	Session persistence is local rather than cross-device Plugins and extensions are not supported Browser collaboration depends on the optional Web Share feature
Our verdict	Zellij is a free, open-source terminal workspace for developers, operations-focused users, and people who work primarily in terminals. Its core multiplexing features include panes, tabs, floating and stacked panes, configurable keybindings… Read the review →	RMUX is an open-source terminal multiplexer written in Rust for developers and automation-focused teams. Its tmux-compatible CLI supports sessions, windows, panes, configurable layouts, and detach-and-reattach behavior across Linux, macOS,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Zellij — where it wins

  • Runs across Linux, macOS, Windows, and the web
  • Combines panes, tabs, layouts, floating, and stacked panes
  • Adds plugins, session resurrection, and collaborative sharing

  Where it doesn't

  • Session resurrection is local rather than a hosted persistence layer
  • Browser access requires an optional self-hosted web client
  • Does not include AI features

• RMUX — where it wins

  • tmux-compatible CLI with more than 90 commands
  • Rust, Python, and TypeScript SDKs for terminal automation
  • Native Linux, macOS, and Windows support without WSL

  Where it doesn't

  • Session persistence is local rather than cross-device
  • Plugins and extensions are not supported
  • Browser collaboration depends on the optional Web Share feature

• Zellij9.4/10 · Free plan

  A free, open-source multiplexer with layouts, plugins, persistence, and collaboration.

  Visit ZellijFull verdict →
• RMUX8.7/10 · Open source

  RMUX combines tmux-compatible workflows with automation, local persistence, and browser sharing.

  Visit RMUXFull verdict →