Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Terminal Multiplexers

muxel vs RMUX

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score muxel #3 in Terminal Multiplexers 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit muxel
RMUX #6 in Terminal Multiplexers 8.7/10 Open source ✓ 2 of 4 features Visit RMUX

muxel leads on 0 checks, RMUX on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoremuxel · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly muxel

muxel scores higher on our rubric for terminal multiplexers: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

On persistence scope, muxel gives you Both where RMUX offers Local. RMUX offers collaboration features; muxel doesn't.

muxel is the better fit for cross-platform developers and coding agents. RMUX is the better fit for automation-heavy multiplexing teams.

  • muxel fits best

    Cross-platform developers and coding agents

  • RMUX fits best

    Automation-heavy multiplexing teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature muxel 9.0/10 Visit ↗ RMUX 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.7
Ranking #3 in Terminal Multiplexers #6 in Terminal Multiplexers
Best for Cross-platform developers and coding agents Automation-heavy multiplexing teams
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop, Browser extension
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features muxel 2/4 · RMUX 2/4
Session synchronization ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Collaboration features — ✓ (best)
Custom pane layouts ✓ ✓
Plugins or extensions Not checked yet —
Specs
Persistence scope Both Local
Access platforms Linux, macOS, Windows desktop app; remote SSH hosts Linux, macOS, Windows, local CLI, browser via Web Share, Rust/Python/TypeScript SDKs
Maximum sessions Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Free and open source under GPL-3.0
  • Rich panes, tabs, saved layouts, and persistent sessions
  • Built-in Git worktrees, editor, file browser, and agent tracking
  • tmux-compatible CLI with more than 90 commands
  • Rust, Python, and TypeScript SDKs for terminal automation
  • Native Linux, macOS, and Windows support without WSL
Cons
  • No collaboration features
  • GPL-3.0 terms may not suit every commercial use
  • Focused on developers managing multiple coding sessions
  • Session persistence is local rather than cross-device
  • Plugins and extensions are not supported
  • Browser collaboration depends on the optional Web Share feature
Our verdict

muxel is a native desktop terminal multiplexer for developers running multiple coding agents and shells at once. It creates tiled and tabbed workspaces on Linux, macOS, and Windows, with resizable horizontal and vertical panes,…

Read the review →

RMUX is an open-source terminal multiplexer written in Rust for developers and automation-focused teams. Its tmux-compatible CLI supports sessions, windows, panes, configurable layouts, and detach-and-reattach behavior across Linux, macOS,…

Read the review →
  1. muxelTerminal Multiplexers 9.0Free plan
  2. RMUXTerminal Multiplexers 8.7Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • muxel — where it wins

    • Free and open source under GPL-3.0
    • Rich panes, tabs, saved layouts, and persistent sessions
    • Built-in Git worktrees, editor, file browser, and agent tracking

    Where it doesn't

    • No collaboration features
    • GPL-3.0 terms may not suit every commercial use
    • Focused on developers managing multiple coding sessions

  • RMUX — where it wins

    • tmux-compatible CLI with more than 90 commands
    • Rust, Python, and TypeScript SDKs for terminal automation
    • Native Linux, macOS, and Windows support without WSL

    Where it doesn't

    • Session persistence is local rather than cross-device
    • Plugins and extensions are not supported
    • Browser collaboration depends on the optional Web Share feature
  • muxel9.0/10 · Free plan

    A free, open-source workspace for managing multiple local and remote coding sessions.

    Visit muxelFull verdict →
  • RMUX8.7/10 · Open source

    RMUX combines tmux-compatible workflows with automation, local persistence, and browser sharing.

    Visit RMUXFull verdict →

More comparisons

All terminal multiplexers comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update