muxel vs p2pmux

muxel9.0Visit p2pmux8.6Visit

Higher score muxel #3 in Terminal Multiplexers 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit muxel

vs

p2pmux #7 in Terminal Multiplexers 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit p2pmux

• muxel fits best

  Cross-platform developers and coding agents

• p2pmux fits best

  Encrypted peer-to-peer collaboration

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	muxel 9.0/10 Visit ↗	p2pmux 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.0	8.6
Ranking	#3 in Terminal Multiplexers	#7 in Terminal Multiplexers
Best for	Cross-platform developers and coding agents	Encrypted peer-to-peer collaboration
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Desktop	Self-hosted
Platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux	macOS, Linux
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market	Solo, Small business
Features muxel 2/4 · p2pmux 3/4
Session synchronization	✓	✓
Collaboration features	—	✓ (best)
Custom pane layouts	✓	✓
Plugins or extensions	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Specs
Persistence scope	Both	Local
Access platforms	Linux, macOS, Windows desktop app; remote SSH hosts	macOS and Linux command-line terminals
Maximum sessions	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Free and open source under GPL-3.0 Rich panes, tabs, saved layouts, and persistent sessions Built-in Git worktrees, editor, file browser, and agent tracking	Real PTY panes run on the machines that host them End-to-end encryption with direct or relayed connectivity Reconnect pairing and session failover support collaboration continuity
Cons	No collaboration features GPL-3.0 terms may not suit every commercial use Focused on developers managing multiple coding sessions	Limited to macOS and Linux command-line terminals Local persistence keeps session state on participating machines Early-stage project may suit builders more than conservative teams
Our verdict	muxel is a native desktop terminal multiplexer for developers running multiple coding agents and shells at once. It creates tiled and tabbed workspaces on Linux, macOS, and Windows, with resizable horizontal and vertical panes,… Read the review →	p2pmux is a free, open-source terminal multiplexer for macOS and Linux. It is designed for multiple users and machines that need to join shared terminal sessions while keeping each pane tied to a real shell on the machine hosting it. Users… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• muxel — where it wins

  • Free and open source under GPL-3.0
  • Rich panes, tabs, saved layouts, and persistent sessions
  • Built-in Git worktrees, editor, file browser, and agent tracking

  Where it doesn't

  • No collaboration features
  • GPL-3.0 terms may not suit every commercial use
  • Focused on developers managing multiple coding sessions

• p2pmux — where it wins

  • Real PTY panes run on the machines that host them
  • End-to-end encryption with direct or relayed connectivity
  • Reconnect pairing and session failover support collaboration continuity

  Where it doesn't

  • Limited to macOS and Linux command-line terminals
  • Local persistence keeps session state on participating machines
  • Early-stage project may suit builders more than conservative teams

• muxel9.0/10 · Free plan

  A free, open-source workspace for managing multiple local and remote coding sessions.

  Visit muxelFull verdict →
• p2pmux8.6/10 · Free plan

  A free, open-source multiplexer for encrypted collaborative terminal sessions.

  Visit p2pmuxFull verdict →