Head-to-head · Terminal Multiplexers
Zellij vs p2pmux
Zellij leads on 0 checks, p2pmux on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreZellij · 9.4/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresZellij · 4 of 4
Zellij scores higher on our rubric for terminal multiplexers: 9.4 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.
Zellij is the better fit for feature-rich cross-platform terminal multiplexing. p2pmux is the better fit for encrypted peer-to-peer collaboration.
- Zellij fits best
Feature-rich cross-platform terminal multiplexing
- p2pmux fits best
Encrypted peer-to-peer collaboration
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Zellij 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | p2pmux 8.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Ranking | #1 in Terminal Multiplexers | #7 in Terminal Multiplexers |
| Best for | Feature-rich cross-platform terminal multiplexing | Encrypted peer-to-peer collaboration |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | macOS, Linux |
| Support | Docs | Docs, Community |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business |
| Features Zellij 4/4 · p2pmux 3/4 | ||
| Session synchronization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Collaboration features | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom pane layouts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Plugins or extensions | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Persistence scope | Local | Local |
| Access platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows terminals; browser web client | macOS and Linux command-line terminals |
| Maximum sessions | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Zellij is a free, open-source terminal workspace for developers, operations-focused users, and people who work primarily in terminals. Its core multiplexing features include panes, tabs, floating and stacked panes, configurable keybindings… Read the review → |
p2pmux is a free, open-source terminal multiplexer for macOS and Linux. It is designed for multiple users and machines that need to join shared terminal sessions while keeping each pane tied to a real shell on the machine hosting it. Users… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Zellij — where it wins
- Runs across Linux, macOS, Windows, and the web
- Combines panes, tabs, layouts, floating, and stacked panes
- Adds plugins, session resurrection, and collaborative sharing
Where it doesn't
- Session resurrection is local rather than a hosted persistence layer
- Browser access requires an optional self-hosted web client
- Does not include AI features
p2pmux — where it wins
- Real PTY panes run on the machines that host them
- End-to-end encryption with direct or relayed connectivity
- Reconnect pairing and session failover support collaboration continuity
Where it doesn't
- Limited to macOS and Linux command-line terminals
- Local persistence keeps session state on participating machines
- Early-stage project may suit builders more than conservative teams
- Zellij9.4/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source multiplexer with layouts, plugins, persistence, and collaboration.
Visit ZellijFull verdict → - p2pmux8.6/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source multiplexer for encrypted collaborative terminal sessions.
Visit p2pmuxFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Zellij vs tmux
- Zellij vs muxel
- Zellij vs TUIOS
- Zellij vs Okena
- Zellij vs RMUX
- Zellij vs TermStation
- tmux vs p2pmux
- muxel vs p2pmux
All terminal multiplexers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




