Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Terminal Multiplexers

tmux vs RMUX

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score tmux #2 in Terminal Multiplexers 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit tmux
RMUX #6 in Terminal Multiplexers 8.7/10 Open source ✓ 2 of 4 features Visit RMUX

tmux leads on 0 checks, RMUX on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoretmux · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly tmux

tmux scores higher on our rubric for terminal multiplexers: 9.2 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

tmux is the better fit for proven Unix terminal session management. RMUX is the better fit for automation-heavy multiplexing teams.

  • tmux fits best

    Proven Unix terminal session management

  • RMUX fits best

    Automation-heavy multiplexing teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature tmux 9.2/10 Visit ↗ RMUX 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.7
Ranking #2 in Terminal Multiplexers #6 in Terminal Multiplexers
Best for Proven Unix terminal session management Automation-heavy multiplexing teams
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Desktop, Browser extension
Platforms Linux, macOS Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs, Community
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features tmux 2/4 · RMUX 2/4
Session synchronization Not checked yet Not checked yet
Collaboration features ✓ ✓
Custom pane layouts ✓ ✓
Plugins or extensions Not checked yet —
Specs
Persistence scope Local Local
Access platforms OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux, macOS, and Solaris Linux, macOS, Windows, local CLI, browser via Web Share, Rust/Python/TypeScript SDKs
Maximum sessions Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Persistent sessions continue running after detaching
  • Flexible sessions, windows, panes, layouts, and key bindings
  • Open-source, free, scriptable, and supports multiple clients
  • tmux-compatible CLI with more than 90 commands
  • Rust, Python, and TypeScript SDKs for terminal automation
  • Native Linux, macOS, and Windows support without WSL
Cons
  • Persistence is local rather than synchronized across devices
  • Requires command-line familiarity and configuration
  • No formal plugin system is part of its documented model
  • Session persistence is local rather than cross-device
  • Plugins and extensions are not supported
  • Browser collaboration depends on the optional Web Share feature
Our verdict

tmux is an open-source terminal multiplexer for command-line users on Unix-like operating systems. It creates and controls multiple terminals from one screen, organizing them into sessions, windows, and panes. Users can detach from a…

Read the review →

RMUX is an open-source terminal multiplexer written in Rust for developers and automation-focused teams. Its tmux-compatible CLI supports sessions, windows, panes, configurable layouts, and detach-and-reattach behavior across Linux, macOS,…

Read the review →
  1. tmuxTerminal Multiplexers 9.2Free plan
  2. RMUXTerminal Multiplexers 8.7Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • tmux — where it wins

    • Persistent sessions continue running after detaching
    • Flexible sessions, windows, panes, layouts, and key bindings
    • Open-source, free, scriptable, and supports multiple clients

    Where it doesn't

    • Persistence is local rather than synchronized across devices
    • Requires command-line familiarity and configuration
    • No formal plugin system is part of its documented model

  • RMUX — where it wins

    • tmux-compatible CLI with more than 90 commands
    • Rust, Python, and TypeScript SDKs for terminal automation
    • Native Linux, macOS, and Windows support without WSL

    Where it doesn't

    • Session persistence is local rather than cross-device
    • Plugins and extensions are not supported
    • Browser collaboration depends on the optional Web Share feature
  • tmux9.2/10 · Free plan

    A free, scriptable way to manage persistent local terminal sessions across Unix platforms.

    Visit tmuxFull verdict →
  • RMUX8.7/10 · Open source

    RMUX combines tmux-compatible workflows with automation, local persistence, and browser sharing.

    Visit RMUXFull verdict →

More comparisons

All terminal multiplexers comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update