Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · IT SLA Management Software

Xurrent Service Level Management vs SolarWinds Service Desk

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Xurrent Service Level Management #2 in IT SLA Management Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Xurrent
SolarWinds Service Desk #3 in IT SLA Management Software 8.7/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 5 features Visit SolarWinds

Xurrent Service Level Management leads on 0 checks, SolarWinds Service Desk on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreXurrent Service Level Management · 8.8/10
  • Free trialonly SolarWinds Service Desk
  • Most featuresXurrent Service Level Management · 5 of 5

Xurrent Service Level Management scores higher on our rubric for it sla management software: 8.8 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

Xurrent Service Level Management is the better fit for complex customer SLA programs. SolarWinds Service Desk is the better fit for mature IT teams with asset depth.

  • Xurrent Service Level Management fits best

    Complex customer SLA programs

  • SolarWinds Service Desk fits best

    Mature IT teams with asset depth

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Xurrent Service Level Management 8.8/10 Visit ↗ SolarWinds Service Desk 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.7
Ranking #2 in IT SLA Management Software #3 in IT SLA Management Software
Best for Complex customer SLA programs Mature IT teams with asset depth
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — $39/seat/mo
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Email, Tickets, Community, Docs · 24/7 Email, Live chat, Phone, Community · 24/7
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, 2FA
Integrations 5 integrations 200+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Xurrent Service Level Management 5/5 · SolarWinds Service Desk 0/5
Escalation automation ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Business-hour calendars ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Multi-level SLAs ✓ (best) Not checked yet
SLA reporting ✓ (best) Not checked yet
API access ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
SLA scope Both Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Configurable targets, calendars, monitoring, warnings, and escalations
  • Supports service hierarchies, OLAs, XLAs, and customer-specific offerings
  • REST, GraphQL, webhooks, MCP, and iPaaS integration options
  • SLA targets, timers, breach monitoring, and reporting
  • Asset management, CMDB, and dependency mapping
  • Self-service, automation, mobile apps, and AI features
Cons
  • License pricing requires a contact-sales process
  • Business-hours support applies to Corporate and MSP Corporate plans
  • Unlimited ESM is reserved for Enterprise and MSP Enterprise plans
  • No free plan; annual billing applies to published pricing
  • Advanced automation and AI require higher-priced tiers
  • Broad scope may exceed the needs of smaller IT teams
Our verdict

Xurrent Service Level Management helps IT and enterprise service teams define, monitor, and report on service commitments. It supports configurable response and resolution targets, business-hour and service-hour calendars, impact-level and…

Read the review →

SolarWinds Service Desk is a cloud-based IT service management platform for IT teams supporting employees and managing service operations. Its scope covers incident, problem, change, and release management, plus service catalogs,…

Read the review →
  1. Xurrent Service Level ManagementIT SLA Management Software 8.8Pricing on request
  2. SolarWinds Service DeskIT SLA Management Software 8.730-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Xurrent Service Level Management — where it wins

    • Configurable targets, calendars, monitoring, warnings, and escalations
    • Supports service hierarchies, OLAs, XLAs, and customer-specific offerings
    • REST, GraphQL, webhooks, MCP, and iPaaS integration options

    Where it doesn't

    • License pricing requires a contact-sales process
    • Business-hours support applies to Corporate and MSP Corporate plans
    • Unlimited ESM is reserved for Enterprise and MSP Enterprise plans
  • SolarWinds Service Desk — where it wins

    • SLA targets, timers, breach monitoring, and reporting
    • Asset management, CMDB, and dependency mapping
    • Self-service, automation, mobile apps, and AI features

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; annual billing applies to published pricing
    • Advanced automation and AI require higher-priced tiers
    • Broad scope may exceed the needs of smaller IT teams
  • Xurrent Service Level Management8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad SLA platform for complex IT, enterprise service, and managed-service programs.

    Visit XurrentFull verdict →
  • SolarWinds Service Desk8.7/10 · 30-day trial

    A broad ITSM platform for teams that need SLA oversight alongside assets, workflows, and AI.

    Visit SolarWindsFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update