Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software

Workable vs Greenhouse

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Workable #4 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 7.5/10 Free plan · paid from $299/mo · 15-day trial Free plan✓ 2 of 5 features Visit Workable

Workable leads on 1 check, Greenhouse on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreWorkable · 7.5/10
  • Free planonly Workable

Workable scores higher on our rubric for applicant tracking systems - enterprise software: 7.5 against 7.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Workable offers free plan; Greenhouse doesn't publish it.

Workable is the better fit for teams wanting broad coverage and a free entry plan. Greenhouse is the better fit for enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows.

  • Workable fits best

    Teams wanting broad coverage and a free entry plan

  • Greenhouse fits best

    Enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Workable 7.5/10 Visit ↗ Greenhouse 7.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.5 7.1
Ranking #4 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software #6 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software
Best for Teams wanting broad coverage and a free entry plan Enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile, Browser extension Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension Web
Support Email, Live chat, Phone, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 Email, Live chat, Tickets, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS, SSO/SAML
Integrations 270+ integrations 500+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Workable 2/5 · Greenhouse 2/5
Branded career site ✓ ✓
Candidate CRM Not published Not published
Interview scheduling ✓ ✓
Compliance controls Not published Not published
SSO and provisioning Not published Not published
Specs
Analytics depth Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Distributes jobs to 200+ job boards and includes a branded career-site builder.
  • Automates resume parsing, interview scheduling, hiring workflows and reporting.
  • Offers web, iOS, Android, browser extension and API access, plus 270 integrations.
  • Structured interview kits, plans, scorecards, and candidate scheduling
  • Workflow automation, reporting, offer forecasting, and configurable permissions
  • 500 integrations plus APIs, job distribution, and compliance coverage
Cons
  • Free plan only allows viewing existing candidates, not posting jobs or engaging them.
  • Listed prices apply to the 1–20 employee tier and vary by employee count.
  • Monthly paid plans start at $299, with Premier at $599 and Enterprise at $719.
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than published plan rates
  • Support is available by email, chat, tickets, and docs, but not 24/7
  • Audit logs, advanced security, and developer sandbox access require Pro
Our verdict

Workable combines applicant tracking with HR tools for organizations that need to source, assess, hire and manage employees. Recruiting features include job-board distribution, career pages, resume parsing, candidate screening, interview…

Read the review →

Greenhouse is a cloud-based applicant tracking and hiring platform for recruiting teams managing structured, repeatable workflows. It combines sourcing and candidate relationship management with career sites, branded job boards, resume…

Read the review →
  1. WorkableApplicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 7.5Free plan · paid from $299/mo · 15-day trial
  2. GreenhouseApplicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 7.1Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Workable — where it wins

    • Distributes jobs to 200+ job boards and includes a branded career-site builder.
    • Automates resume parsing, interview scheduling, hiring workflows and reporting.
    • Offers web, iOS, Android, browser extension and API access, plus 270 integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan only allows viewing existing candidates, not posting jobs or engaging them.
    • Listed prices apply to the 1–20 employee tier and vary by employee count.
    • Monthly paid plans start at $299, with Premier at $599 and Enterprise at $719.
  • Greenhouse — where it wins

    • Structured interview kits, plans, scorecards, and candidate scheduling
    • Workflow automation, reporting, offer forecasting, and configurable permissions
    • 500 integrations plus APIs, job distribution, and compliance coverage

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than published plan rates
    • Support is available by email, chat, tickets, and docs, but not 24/7
    • Audit logs, advanced security, and developer sandbox access require Pro
  • Workable7.5/10 · Free plan · paid from $299/mo · 15-day trial

    Broad recruiting coverage, with a restricted Free plan and paid plans from $299 monthly.

    Visit WorkableFull verdict →
  • Greenhouse7.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A mature ATS for structured hiring, automation, governance, and enterprise integrations.

    Visit GreenhouseFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update