Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software

Lever vs Greenhouse

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Lever #2 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 5 features Visit Lever

Lever leads on 0 checks, Greenhouse on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreLever · 8.2/10

Lever scores higher on our rubric for applicant tracking systems - enterprise software: 8.2 against 7.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

Lever is the better fit for organizations combining ATS and candidate CRM. Greenhouse is the better fit for enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows.

  • Lever fits best

    Organizations combining ATS and candidate CRM

  • Greenhouse fits best

    Enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Lever 8.2/10 Visit ↗ Greenhouse 7.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.2 7.1
Ranking #2 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software #6 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software
Best for Organizations combining ATS and candidate CRM Enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan Not published Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs, Phone Email, Live chat, Tickets, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS, SSO/SAML
Integrations 400+ integrations 500+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Lever 2/5 · Greenhouse 2/5
Branded career site ✓ ✓
Candidate CRM Not published Not published
Interview scheduling ✓ ✓
Compliance controls Not published Not published
SSO and provisioning Not published Not published
Specs
Analytics depth Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Brings candidate pipelines and talent pools into one recruiting system
  • Automates interview scheduling, follow-ups, and approval chains
  • Offers 400 integrations and compliance reporting
  • Structured interview kits, plans, scorecards, and candidate scheduling
  • Workflow automation, reporting, offer forecasting, and configurable permissions
  • 500 integrations plus APIs, job distribution, and compliance coverage
Cons
  • Pricing is quote-based rather than published by plan
  • Cloud deployment may not suit teams seeking other deployment options
  • Its combined ATS and CRM scope may exceed simpler hiring needs
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than published plan rates
  • Support is available by email, chat, tickets, and docs, but not 24/7
  • Audit logs, advanced security, and developer sandbox access require Pro
Our verdict

Lever brings applicant tracking and recruiting CRM together for organizations that need to manage candidates from sourcing through hiring. Its cloud platform supports small, mid-market, and enterprise teams, with candidate pipelines,…

Read the review →

Greenhouse is a cloud-based applicant tracking and hiring platform for recruiting teams managing structured, repeatable workflows. It combines sourcing and candidate relationship management with career sites, branded job boards, resume…

Read the review →
  1. LeverApplicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 8.2Pricing on request
  2. GreenhouseApplicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 7.1Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Lever — where it wins

    • Brings candidate pipelines and talent pools into one recruiting system
    • Automates interview scheduling, follow-ups, and approval chains
    • Offers 400 integrations and compliance reporting

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is quote-based rather than published by plan
    • Cloud deployment may not suit teams seeking other deployment options
    • Its combined ATS and CRM scope may exceed simpler hiring needs
  • Greenhouse — where it wins

    • Structured interview kits, plans, scorecards, and candidate scheduling
    • Workflow automation, reporting, offer forecasting, and configurable permissions
    • 500 integrations plus APIs, job distribution, and compliance coverage

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than published plan rates
    • Support is available by email, chat, tickets, and docs, but not 24/7
    • Audit logs, advanced security, and developer sandbox access require Pro
  • Lever8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    Combines applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, and recruiting workflows.

    Visit LeverFull verdict →
  • Greenhouse7.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A mature ATS for structured hiring, automation, governance, and enterprise integrations.

    Visit GreenhouseFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update