Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software

Greenhouse vs Avature

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Greenhouse #5 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 5 features Visit Greenhouse
Avature #8 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 5 features Visit Avature

Greenhouse leads on 0 checks, Avature on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGreenhouse · 8.9/10

Greenhouse scores higher on our rubric for applicant tracking systems - enterprise software: 8.9 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

Greenhouse is the better fit for enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows. Avature is the better fit for enterprises needing configurable recruiting processes.

  • Greenhouse fits best

    Enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows

  • Avature fits best

    Enterprises needing configurable recruiting processes

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Greenhouse 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Avature 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.7
Ranking #5 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software #8 in Applicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software
Best for Enterprises prioritizing mature hiring workflows Enterprises needing configurable recruiting processes
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Live chat, Tickets, Docs Tickets, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS, SSO/SAML GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations 500+ integrations 3 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise
Features Greenhouse 2/5 · Avature 2/5
Branded career site ✓ ✓
Candidate CRM Not checked yet Not checked yet
Interview scheduling ✓ ✓
Compliance controls Not checked yet Not checked yet
SSO and provisioning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Analytics depth Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Structured interview kits, plans, scorecards, and candidate scheduling
  • Workflow automation, reporting, offer forecasting, and configurable permissions
  • 500 integrations plus APIs, job distribution, and compliance coverage
  • Configurable workflows, approvals and data capture support complex processes
  • Semantic search, matching and ranking help organize candidate discovery
  • Career sites, scheduling, analytics and AI agents cover broad recruiting needs
Cons
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than published plan rates
  • Support is available by email, chat, tickets, and docs, but not 24/7
  • Audit logs, advanced security, and developer sandbox access require Pro
  • Pricing requires contacting Avature’s sales team
  • Cloud deployment may not suit organizations requiring other deployment options
  • Enterprise-oriented configuration may exceed the needs of smaller teams
Our verdict

Greenhouse is a cloud-based applicant tracking and hiring platform for recruiting teams managing structured, repeatable workflows. It combines sourcing and candidate relationship management with career sites, branded job boards, resume…

Read the review →

Avature ATS is a cloud recruiting system for enterprises hiring across regions, brands and business units. It combines configurable workflows, approvals and data capture with candidate communications, screening, interview scheduling, offer…

Read the review →
  1. GreenhouseApplicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 8.9Pricing on request
  2. AvatureApplicant Tracking Systems - Enterprise Software 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Greenhouse — where it wins

    • Structured interview kits, plans, scorecards, and candidate scheduling
    • Workflow automation, reporting, offer forecasting, and configurable permissions
    • 500 integrations plus APIs, job distribution, and compliance coverage

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than published plan rates
    • Support is available by email, chat, tickets, and docs, but not 24/7
    • Audit logs, advanced security, and developer sandbox access require Pro
  • Avature — where it wins

    • Configurable workflows, approvals and data capture support complex processes
    • Semantic search, matching and ranking help organize candidate discovery
    • Career sites, scheduling, analytics and AI agents cover broad recruiting needs

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting Avature’s sales team
    • Cloud deployment may not suit organizations requiring other deployment options
    • Enterprise-oriented configuration may exceed the needs of smaller teams
  • Greenhouse8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A mature ATS for structured hiring, automation, governance, and enterprise integrations.

    Visit GreenhouseFull verdict →
  • Avature8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    Enterprise ATS with configurable workflows, matching, scheduling, career sites and AI agents.

    Visit AvatureFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update