Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Formal Verification Tools

Rocq vs Lean

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Rocq #3 in Formal Verification Tools 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Rocq
Lean #5 in Formal Verification Tools 9.1/10 Open source ✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Lean

Rocq leads on 0 checks, Lean on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRocq · 9.3/10
  • Free planonly Rocq

Rocq scores higher on our rubric for formal verification tools: 9.3 against 9.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

On deployment, Lean gives you Both where Rocq offers Self-hosted.

Rocq is the better fit for certified theorem proving with strong tooling. Lean is the better fit for modern dependent-type verification.

  • Rocq fits best

    Certified theorem proving with strong tooling

  • Lean fits best

    Modern dependent-type verification

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Rocq 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Lean 9.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 9.1
Ranking #3 in Formal Verification Tools #5 in Formal Verification Tools
Best for Certified theorem proving with strong tooling Modern dependent-type verification
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 1 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Rocq 1/2 · Lean 1/2
Counterexamples Not checked yet Not checked yet
Proof artifacts ✓ ✓
Specs
Verification method Deductive Deductive
Supported formalisms Theorem-proving Theorem-proving
Input languages Gallina and Rocq vernacular Lean 4
Deployment Self-hosted Both
Our review
Pros
  • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
  • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
  • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam
  • Kernel-based checking produces independently checkable proof terms.
  • Tactics and metaprogramming support extensible proof automation.
  • Works across web, desktop, Linux, and self-hosted environments.
Cons
  • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
  • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
  • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • Its formalism focus is theorem-proving rather than a broad multi-formalism toolkit.
  • The listed editor integration is centered on Visual Studio Code.
  • Lean 4 is the listed input language for formalization workflows.
Our verdict

Rocq is an open-source interactive theorem prover and dependently typed programming language for mathematical formalisation, education, research, and verified software development. It lets users define programs, predicates, mathematical…

Read the review →

Lean combines interactive theorem proving with a dependently typed functional programming language. It is intended for formalizing mathematics, verifying software and hardware, and developing reliable programs. The open-source distribution…

Read the review →
  1. RocqFormal Verification Tools 9.3Free plan
  2. LeanFormal Verification Tools 9.1Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Rocq — where it wins

    • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
    • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
    • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
    • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
    • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • Lean — where it wins

    • Kernel-based checking produces independently checkable proof terms.
    • Tactics and metaprogramming support extensible proof automation.
    • Works across web, desktop, Linux, and self-hosted environments.

    Where it doesn't

    • Its formalism focus is theorem-proving rather than a broad multi-formalism toolkit.
    • The listed editor integration is centered on Visual Studio Code.
    • Lean 4 is the listed input language for formalization workflows.
  • Rocq9.3/10 · Free plan

    A free, kernel-checked theorem prover with dependent types, automation, and certified extraction.

    Visit RocqFull verdict →
  • Lean9.1/10 · Open source

    A kernel-checked Lean 4 environment for formal mathematics and verified programs.

    Visit LeanFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update