Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Formal Verification Tools

Rocq vs NuSMV

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Rocq #3 in Formal Verification Tools 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Rocq
NuSMV #6 in Formal Verification Tools 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit NuSMV

Rocq leads on 0 checks, NuSMV on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRocq · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth

Rocq scores higher on our rubric for formal verification tools: 9.3 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

On verification method, NuSMV gives you Hybrid where Rocq offers Deductive. On supported formalisms, Rocq gives you Theorem-proving where NuSMV offers Temporal-logic.

Rocq is the better fit for certified theorem proving with strong tooling. NuSMV is the better fit for finite-state temporal-logic checking.

  • Rocq fits best

    Certified theorem proving with strong tooling

  • NuSMV fits best

    Finite-state temporal-logic checking

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Rocq 9.3/10 Visit ↗ NuSMV 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 9.0
Ranking #3 in Formal Verification Tools #6 in Formal Verification Tools
Best for Certified theorem proving with strong tooling Finite-state temporal-logic checking
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Email, Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Rocq 1/2 · NuSMV 1/2
Counterexamples Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Proof artifacts ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Verification method Deductive Hybrid
Supported formalisms Theorem-proving Temporal-logic
Input languages Gallina and Rocq vernacular SMV
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
  • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
  • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam
  • Combines BDD symbolic and SAT-based bounded model checking
  • Checks CTL, LTL, PSL, and invariant specifications
  • Generates counterexample traces for failed properties
Cons
  • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
  • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
  • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • Focused on finite-state systems and SMV input models
  • Self-hosted deployment requires local installation and operation
  • Uses an interactive textual shell rather than a graphical interface
Our verdict

Rocq is an open-source interactive theorem prover and dependently typed programming language for mathematical formalisation, education, research, and verified software development. It lets users define programs, predicates, mathematical…

Read the review →

NuSMV is an open-source symbolic model checker for formal verification of finite-state systems. It is aimed at engineers, researchers, and verification teams working with synchronous or asynchronous models and properties expressed through…

Read the review →
  1. RocqFormal Verification Tools 9.3Free plan
  2. NuSMVFormal Verification Tools 9.0Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Rocq — where it wins

    • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
    • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
    • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
    • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
    • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • NuSMV — where it wins

    • Combines BDD symbolic and SAT-based bounded model checking
    • Checks CTL, LTL, PSL, and invariant specifications
    • Generates counterexample traces for failed properties

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on finite-state systems and SMV input models
    • Self-hosted deployment requires local installation and operation
    • Uses an interactive textual shell rather than a graphical interface
  • Rocq9.3/10 · Free plan

    A free, kernel-checked theorem prover with dependent types, automation, and certified extraction.

    Visit RocqFull verdict →
  • NuSMV9.0/10 · Free plan

    A free, hybrid formal-verification tool for CTL, LTL, PSL, and invariant checking.

    Visit NuSMVFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update