Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Formal Verification Tools

Rocq vs PVS

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Rocq #3 in Formal Verification Tools 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Rocq
PVS #4 in Formal Verification Tools 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit PVS

Rocq leads on 0 checks, PVS on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRocq · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresPVS · 2 of 2

Rocq scores higher on our rubric for formal verification tools: 9.3 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

On verification method, PVS gives you Hybrid where Rocq offers Deductive.

Rocq is the better fit for certified theorem proving with strong tooling. PVS is the better fit for hybrid specification and model checking.

  • Rocq fits best

    Certified theorem proving with strong tooling

  • PVS fits best

    Hybrid specification and model checking

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Rocq 9.3/10 Visit ↗ PVS 9.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 9.2
Ranking #3 in Formal Verification Tools #4 in Formal Verification Tools
Best for Certified theorem proving with strong tooling Hybrid specification and model checking
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Linux, macOS, Windows
Support Community, Docs Email, Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Rocq 1/2 · PVS 2/2
Counterexamples Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Proof artifacts ✓ ✓
Specs
Verification method Deductive Hybrid
Supported formalisms Theorem-proving Theorem-proving
Input languages Gallina and Rocq vernacular PVS specification language (typed higher-order logic)
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
  • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
  • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam
  • Combines higher-order theorem proving with BDD/CTL model checking
  • Supports SMT proving, random testing, and counterexample discovery
  • Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows with useful integrations
Cons
  • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
  • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
  • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • Its breadth requires expertise in formal methods and proof development
  • Self-hosted deployment places setup and maintenance on the user
  • Commercial use may require additional licensing through SRI
Our verdict

Rocq is an open-source interactive theorem prover and dependently typed programming language for mathematical formalisation, education, research, and verified software development. It lets users define programs, predicates, mathematical…

Read the review →

PVS is a self-hosted formal specification and verification environment for researchers and engineers working on formalizations, proofs, protocols, distributed systems, and safety-critical software or hardware specifications. Its typed…

Read the review →
  1. RocqFormal Verification Tools 9.3Free plan
  2. PVSFormal Verification Tools 9.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Rocq — where it wins

    • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
    • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
    • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
    • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
    • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • PVS — where it wins

    • Combines higher-order theorem proving with BDD/CTL model checking
    • Supports SMT proving, random testing, and counterexample discovery
    • Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows with useful integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Its breadth requires expertise in formal methods and proof development
    • Self-hosted deployment places setup and maintenance on the user
    • Commercial use may require additional licensing through SRI
  • Rocq9.3/10 · Free plan

    A free, kernel-checked theorem prover with dependent types, automation, and certified extraction.

    Visit RocqFull verdict →
  • PVS9.2/10 · Free plan

    A broad, self-hosted environment for hybrid formal verification workflows.

    Visit PVSFull verdict →

Rocq vs PVS: questions

Which is better for formal verification tools, Rocq or PVS?

Rocq scores higher on our rubric for formal verification tools: 9.3 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

How do Rocq and PVS compare?

All 3 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do Rocq and PVS have a free plan?

Rocq: Yes. PVS: Yes.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update