Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Formal Verification Tools

Rocq vs SPIN

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Rocq #3 in Formal Verification Tools 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Rocq
SPIN #7 in Formal Verification Tools 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit SPIN

Rocq leads on 0 checks, SPIN on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRocq · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth

Rocq scores higher on our rubric for formal verification tools: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

On verification method, SPIN gives you Model-checking where Rocq offers Deductive. On supported formalisms, Rocq gives you Theorem-proving where SPIN offers Temporal-logic.

Rocq is the better fit for certified theorem proving with strong tooling. SPIN is the better fit for concurrent-system model checking.

  • Rocq fits best

    Certified theorem proving with strong tooling

  • SPIN fits best

    Concurrent-system model checking

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Rocq 9.3/10 Visit ↗ SPIN 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.8
Ranking #3 in Formal Verification Tools #7 in Formal Verification Tools
Best for Certified theorem proving with strong tooling Concurrent-system model checking
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Rocq 1/2 · SPIN 1/2
Counterexamples Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Proof artifacts ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Verification method Deductive Model-checking
Supported formalisms Theorem-proving Temporal-logic
Input languages Gallina and Rocq vernacular Promela
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
  • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
  • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam
  • Promela models support concurrent-system and protocol analysis
  • Checks deadlocks, assertions, invariants, cycles, and temporal logic
  • Replayable counterexamples and generated C verifiers support diagnosis
Cons
  • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
  • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
  • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • Requires systems to be described in the Promela language
  • Self-hosted deployment places setup and operation on the user
  • Its focus is concurrent-system verification rather than broad software analysis
Our verdict

Rocq is an open-source interactive theorem prover and dependently typed programming language for mathematical formalisation, education, research, and verified software development. It lets users define programs, predicates, mathematical…

Read the review →

SPIN is an open-source formal verification tool for concurrent systems and communication protocols. It is designed for researchers, educators, and engineers who need to model system behavior in Promela and analyze it locally. The workflow…

Read the review →
  1. RocqFormal Verification Tools 9.3Free plan
  2. SPINFormal Verification Tools 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Rocq — where it wins

    • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
    • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
    • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
    • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
    • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • SPIN — where it wins

    • Promela models support concurrent-system and protocol analysis
    • Checks deadlocks, assertions, invariants, cycles, and temporal logic
    • Replayable counterexamples and generated C verifiers support diagnosis

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires systems to be described in the Promela language
    • Self-hosted deployment places setup and operation on the user
    • Its focus is concurrent-system verification rather than broad software analysis
  • Rocq9.3/10 · Free plan

    A free, kernel-checked theorem prover with dependent types, automation, and certified extraction.

    Visit RocqFull verdict →
  • SPIN8.8/10 · Free plan

    A focused, self-hosted model checker for analyzing concurrent systems and protocols.

    Visit SPINFull verdict →

Rocq vs SPIN: questions

Which is better for formal verification tools, Rocq or SPIN?

Rocq scores higher on our rubric for formal verification tools: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

How do Rocq and SPIN compare?

All 3 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do Rocq and SPIN have a free plan?

Rocq: Yes. SPIN: Yes.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update