Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Formal Verification Tools

Rocq vs ACL2

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Rocq #3 in Formal Verification Tools 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Rocq
ACL2 #19 in Formal Verification Tools 7.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit ACL2

Rocq leads on 0 checks, ACL2 on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRocq · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresACL2 · 2 of 2

Rocq scores higher on our rubric for formal verification tools: 9.3 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #19.

Rocq is the better fit for certified theorem proving with strong tooling. ACL2 is the better fit for software and hardware theorem proving.

  • Rocq fits best

    Certified theorem proving with strong tooling

  • ACL2 fits best

    Software and hardware theorem proving

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Rocq 9.3/10 Visit ↗ ACL2 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 7.6
Ranking #3 in Formal Verification Tools #19 in Formal Verification Tools
Best for Certified theorem proving with strong tooling Software and hardware theorem proving
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Rocq 1/2 · ACL2 2/2
Counterexamples Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Proof artifacts ✓ ✓
Specs
Verification method Deductive Deductive
Supported formalisms Theorem-proving Theorem-proving
Input languages Gallina and Rocq vernacular ACL2 logic and a subset of applicative Common Lisp
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
  • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
  • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam
  • Combines rewriting, induction, symbolic simulation, BDD and SAT reasoning
  • Supports software and hardware verification with community-maintained libraries
  • Provides counterexamples and certified books with machine-readable artifacts
Cons
  • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
  • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
  • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • Self-hosted distribution requires local source code or executable installation
  • Uses ACL2 logic and a subset of applicative Common Lisp
  • Windows deployments typically involve Unix emulation or a virtual machine
Our verdict

Rocq is an open-source interactive theorem prover and dependently typed programming language for mathematical formalisation, education, research, and verified software development. It lets users define programs, predicates, mathematical…

Read the review →

ACL2 is an interactive theorem prover and programming language for modeling computer systems and proving properties about those models. Its logic is based on a subset of applicative Common Lisp, making it suitable for teams working with…

Read the review →
  1. RocqFormal Verification Tools 9.3Free plan
  2. ACL2Formal Verification Tools 7.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Rocq — where it wins

    • Kernel machine-checks proof terms through a small certification kernel
    • Extracts certified programs to OCaml, Haskell, and Scheme
    • Supports RocqIDE, major editors, Docker, and opam

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on theorem proving rather than broader verification formalisms
    • Self-hosted deployment requires managing the local environment
    • No commercial pricing tiers or vendor-hosted plan options
  • ACL2 — where it wins

    • Combines rewriting, induction, symbolic simulation, BDD and SAT reasoning
    • Supports software and hardware verification with community-maintained libraries
    • Provides counterexamples and certified books with machine-readable artifacts

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted distribution requires local source code or executable installation
    • Uses ACL2 logic and a subset of applicative Common Lisp
    • Windows deployments typically involve Unix emulation or a virtual machine
  • Rocq9.3/10 · Free plan

    A free, kernel-checked theorem prover with dependent types, automation, and certified extraction.

    Visit RocqFull verdict →
  • ACL27.6/10 · Free plan

    A free, self-hosted prover for software and hardware verification with deep deductive reasoning.

    Visit ACL2Full verdict →

Rocq vs ACL2: questions

Which is better for formal verification tools, Rocq or ACL2?

Rocq scores higher on our rubric for formal verification tools: 9.3 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #19.

How do Rocq and ACL2 compare?

All 3 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do Rocq and ACL2 have a free plan?

Rocq: Yes. ACL2: Yes.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update