Head-to-head · Backend as a Service
Nhost vs InsForge
Nhost leads on 0 checks, InsForge on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreNhost · 7.5/10
- Free planboth
Nhost scores higher on our rubric for backend as a service: 7.5 against 7.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.
Nhost is the better fit for graphQL-first Postgres applications. InsForge is the better fit for teams wanting Postgres BaaS with edge functions.
- Nhost fits best
GraphQL-first Postgres applications
- InsForge fits best
Teams wanting Postgres BaaS with edge functions
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Nhost 7.5/10 Visit ↗ | InsForge 7.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| Ranking | #4 in Backend as a Service | #8 in Backend as a Service |
| Best for | GraphQL-first Postgres applications | Teams wanting Postgres BaaS with edge functions |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | $25/mo | $25/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, iOS, Android |
| Support | Email, Community, Docs · 24/7 | Community, Docs |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, 2FA | SOC 2, HIPAA, SSO/SAML |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market |
| Features Nhost 4/4 · InsForge 4/4 | ||
| Serverless functions | ✓ | ✓ |
| Realtime data | ✓ | ✓ |
| File storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic APIs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Database type | Relational | Relational |
| Authentication methods | Not published | Passwordless |
| Free authentication users | Not published | 50000 users |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Nhost is a managed backend platform for developers building web and mobile applications around PostgreSQL and GraphQL. Each project gets a dedicated PostgreSQL database, with automatically generated queries, mutations, and realtime… Read the review → |
InsForge brings a Postgres database together with generated typed REST and SDK endpoints, authentication, object storage, realtime updates and Deno-powered TypeScript edge functions. It is aimed at developers building applications with AI… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Nhost — where it wins
- Generated GraphQL queries, mutations, and realtime subscriptions
- Authentication includes MFA, WebAuthn, OAuth, and magic links
- Local Docker development, Git deployments, storage, and functions
Where it doesn't
- Team pricing rises to $599 per month
- Dedicated clusters are an Enterprise add-on
- GraphQL is central to the platform's API approach
InsForge — where it wins
- Generated typed REST and SDK endpoints for Postgres tables
- Combines auth, storage, realtime, migrations and edge functions
- Free plan includes 50,000 monthly active users
Where it doesn't
- Pro compute and AI Model Gateway charges are usage-based
- Enterprise pricing is custom
- Enterprise HIPAA is a paid add-on
- Nhost7.5/10 · Free plan · paid from $25/mo
A capable GraphQL-first backend with PostgreSQL, realtime APIs, and a free starting tier.
Visit NhostFull verdict → - InsForge7.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $25/mo
Postgres, auth, storage and edge functions, with free and paid plans.
Visit InsForgeFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Supabase vs Nhost
- Supabase vs InsForge
- Appwrite Realtime vs Nhost
- Appwrite Realtime vs InsForge
- Convex vs Nhost
- Convex vs InsForge
- Nhost vs PocketBase
- Nhost vs Xano
All backend as a service comparisons → · Full ranking →
Guides on backend as a service
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






