Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Backend as a Service

Supabase vs Nhost

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Supabase #1 in Backend as a Service 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Supabase
Nhost #7 in Backend as a Service 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Nhost

Supabase leads on 0 checks, Nhost on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSupabase · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresNhost · 4 of 4

Supabase scores higher on our rubric for backend as a service: 9.2 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.

Supabase is the better fit for full-featured Postgres BaaS teams. Nhost is the better fit for graphQL-first Postgres applications.

  • Supabase fits best

    Full-featured Postgres BaaS teams

  • Nhost fits best

    GraphQL-first Postgres applications

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Supabase 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Nhost 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 7.8
Ranking #1 in Backend as a Service #7 in Backend as a Service
Best for Full-featured Postgres BaaS teams GraphQL-first Postgres applications
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $25/mo $25/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Features Supabase 0/4 · Nhost 4/4
Serverless functions Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Realtime data Not checked yet ✓ (best)
File storage Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Automatic APIs Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Database type Relational Relational
Authentication methods Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free authentication users Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Dedicated Postgres with generated REST and GraphQL APIs
  • Authentication, Row Level Security, realtime, storage, and Edge Functions
  • Self-hosting, point-in-time recovery, and regional read replicas
  • Generated GraphQL queries, mutations, and realtime subscriptions
  • Authentication includes MFA, WebAuthn, OAuth, and magic links
  • Local Docker development, Git deployments, storage, and functions
Cons
  • Scaling controls are manual
  • Team starts at $599 per month
  • Enterprise features require custom pricing
  • Team pricing rises to $599 per month
  • Dedicated clusters are an Enterprise add-on
  • GraphQL is central to the platform's API approach
Our verdict

Supabase is a hosted Postgres development platform for developers and teams building web and API-based applications. Each project includes a dedicated relational Postgres database, automatically generated REST and GraphQL APIs,…

Read the review →

Nhost is a managed backend platform for developers building web and mobile applications around PostgreSQL and GraphQL. Each project gets a dedicated PostgreSQL database, with automatically generated queries, mutations, and realtime…

Read the review →
  1. SupabaseBackend as a Service 9.2Free plan
  2. NhostBackend as a Service 7.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Supabase — where it wins

    • Dedicated Postgres with generated REST and GraphQL APIs
    • Authentication, Row Level Security, realtime, storage, and Edge Functions
    • Self-hosting, point-in-time recovery, and regional read replicas

    Where it doesn't

    • Scaling controls are manual
    • Team starts at $599 per month
    • Enterprise features require custom pricing
  • Nhost — where it wins

    • Generated GraphQL queries, mutations, and realtime subscriptions
    • Authentication includes MFA, WebAuthn, OAuth, and magic links
    • Local Docker development, Git deployments, storage, and functions

    Where it doesn't

    • Team pricing rises to $599 per month
    • Dedicated clusters are an Enterprise add-on
    • GraphQL is central to the platform's API approach

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update