Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Medical Residency Scheduling Software

Medtrics vs Aurora-Med

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Medtrics #4 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software 7.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Medtrics
Aurora-Med #8 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software 6.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Aurora-Med

Medtrics leads on 0 checks, Aurora-Med on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMedtrics · 7.4/10

Medtrics scores higher on our rubric for medical residency scheduling software: 7.4 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

Medtrics is the better fit for programs with complex rotation constraints. Aurora-Med is the better fit for complex programs needing rule-heavy optimization.

  • Medtrics fits best

    Programs with complex rotation constraints

  • Aurora-Med fits best

    Complex programs needing rule-heavy optimization

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Medtrics 7.4/10 Visit ↗ Aurora-Med 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.4 6.9
Ranking #4 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software #8 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software
Best for Programs with complex rotation constraints Complex programs needing rule-heavy optimization
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan Not published Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Email, Live chat, Phone Phone
Integrations 2 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Medtrics 4/5 · Aurora-Med 4/5
Rotation scheduling ✓ ✓
Call scheduling ✓ ✓
Coverage rules ✓ ✓
Swap workflow Not published Not published
Conflict checks ✓ ✓
Specs
Mobile access Not published Web
Our review
Pros
  • Constraint-based rotation scheduling with optimizer, lottery, and solver workflows
  • Capacity, preferences, hard constraints, and conflicts work in one workflow
  • APIs, single sign-on, and assignment views support program operations
  • Combines rotation, call, clinic, staffing, and coverage scheduling.
  • Checks conflicts, workload rules, qualifications, leave, and availability.
  • Supports what-if analysis, manual overrides, APIs, and enterprise integrations.
Cons
  • Pricing requires a consultation and customer agreement
  • Configuration spans multiple schedule types and workflow inputs
  • Broader education workflows may exceed a scheduling-only need
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales.
  • Its broad configuration may be more than simple programs need.
  • The integration set centers on enterprise and project-management systems.
Our verdict

Medtrics is a cloud-based clinical education platform with scheduling tools for graduate medical education programs, medical schools, nursing, veterinary, and allied-health institutions. Its scheduling coverage includes blocks, shifts,…

Read the review →

Aurora-Med is a configurable scheduling system for medical residency programs that coordinates clinical rotations, resident call, and clinic assignments. It is designed for institutions managing staffing requirements, qualifications,…

Read the review →
  1. MedtricsMedical Residency Scheduling Software 7.4Pricing on request
  2. Aurora-MedMedical Residency Scheduling Software 6.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Medtrics — where it wins

    • Constraint-based rotation scheduling with optimizer, lottery, and solver workflows
    • Capacity, preferences, hard constraints, and conflicts work in one workflow
    • APIs, single sign-on, and assignment views support program operations

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a consultation and customer agreement
    • Configuration spans multiple schedule types and workflow inputs
    • Broader education workflows may exceed a scheduling-only need
  • Aurora-Med — where it wins

    • Combines rotation, call, clinic, staffing, and coverage scheduling.
    • Checks conflicts, workload rules, qualifications, leave, and availability.
    • Supports what-if analysis, manual overrides, APIs, and enterprise integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales.
    • Its broad configuration may be more than simple programs need.
    • The integration set centers on enterprise and project-management systems.
  • Medtrics7.4/10 · Pricing on request

    A constraint-focused scheduler for complex residency rotations, coverage, and publishing.

    Visit MedtricsFull verdict →
  • Aurora-Med6.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A configurable scheduler for residency programs with complex coverage and workload rules.

    Visit Aurora-MedFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update