Head-to-head · Medical Residency Scheduling Software
Medtrics vs Aurora-Med
Medtrics leads on 0 checks, Aurora-Med on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreMedtrics · 7.4/10
Medtrics scores higher on our rubric for medical residency scheduling software: 7.4 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.
Medtrics is the better fit for programs with complex rotation constraints. Aurora-Med is the better fit for complex programs needing rule-heavy optimization.
- Medtrics fits best
Programs with complex rotation constraints
- Aurora-Med fits best
Complex programs needing rule-heavy optimization
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Medtrics 7.4/10 Visit ↗ | Aurora-Med 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.4 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #4 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software | #8 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software |
| Best for | Programs with complex rotation constraints | Complex programs needing rule-heavy optimization |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Email, Live chat, Phone | Phone |
| Integrations | 2 integrations | 8 integrations |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Medtrics 4/5 · Aurora-Med 4/5 | ||
| Rotation scheduling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Call scheduling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coverage rules | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swap workflow | Not published | Not published |
| Conflict checks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Mobile access | Not published | Web |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Medtrics is a cloud-based clinical education platform with scheduling tools for graduate medical education programs, medical schools, nursing, veterinary, and allied-health institutions. Its scheduling coverage includes blocks, shifts,… Read the review → |
Aurora-Med is a configurable scheduling system for medical residency programs that coordinates clinical rotations, resident call, and clinic assignments. It is designed for institutions managing staffing requirements, qualifications,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Medtrics — where it wins
- Constraint-based rotation scheduling with optimizer, lottery, and solver workflows
- Capacity, preferences, hard constraints, and conflicts work in one workflow
- APIs, single sign-on, and assignment views support program operations
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires a consultation and customer agreement
- Configuration spans multiple schedule types and workflow inputs
- Broader education workflows may exceed a scheduling-only need
Aurora-Med — where it wins
- Combines rotation, call, clinic, staffing, and coverage scheduling.
- Checks conflicts, workload rules, qualifications, leave, and availability.
- Supports what-if analysis, manual overrides, APIs, and enterprise integrations.
Where it doesn't
- Pricing is handled through contact sales.
- Its broad configuration may be more than simple programs need.
- The integration set centers on enterprise and project-management systems.
- Medtrics7.4/10 · Pricing on request
A constraint-focused scheduler for complex residency rotations, coverage, and publishing.
Visit MedtricsFull verdict → - Aurora-Med6.9/10 · Pricing on request
A configurable scheduler for residency programs with complex coverage and workload rules.
Visit Aurora-MedFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Amion vs Medtrics
- Amion vs Aurora-Med
- MedHub vs Medtrics
- MedHub vs Aurora-Med
- New Innovations vs Medtrics
- New Innovations vs Aurora-Med
- Medtrics vs MyEvaluations
- Medtrics vs CallGrid
All medical residency scheduling software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





