MedHub vs Aurora-Med

MedHub8.2Visit Aurora-Med6.9Visit

Higher score MedHub #2 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 5 features Visit MedHub

vs

Aurora-Med #8 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software 6.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Aurora-Med

• MedHub fits best

  Programs needing scheduling plus compliance workflows

• Aurora-Med fits best

  Complex programs needing rule-heavy optimization

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	MedHub 8.2/10 Visit ↗	Aurora-Med 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.2	6.9
Ranking	#2 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software	#8 in Medical Residency Scheduling Software
Best for	Programs needing scheduling plus compliance workflows	Complex programs needing rule-heavy optimization
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	Not published	Not published
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Mobile	Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms	Web, iOS, Android	Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support	Email, Phone, Tickets	Phone
Integrations	10 integrations	8 integrations
Built for	Mid-market, Enterprise	Mid-market, Enterprise
Features MedHub 3/5 · Aurora-Med 4/5
Rotation scheduling	✓	✓
Call scheduling	✓	✓
Coverage rules	Not published	✓ (best)
Swap workflow	Not published	Not published
Conflict checks	✓	✓
Specs
Mobile access	Both	Web
Our review
Pros	Combines rotation, call, clinic, and conflict-checking workflows Tracks work hours, violations, absences, and moonlighting Supports mobile access, offline tasks, and schedule integrations	Combines rotation, call, clinic, staffing, and coverage scheduling. Checks conflicts, workload rules, qualifications, leave, and availability. Supports what-if analysis, manual overrides, APIs, and enterprise integrations.
Cons	Standard pricing requires contact with sales Its broader GME scope may exceed scheduling-only needs Offline task completion requires later synchronization	Pricing is handled through contact sales. Its broad configuration may be more than simple programs need. The integration set centers on enterprise and project-management systems.
Our verdict	Built for graduate medical education institutions, MedHub brings residency and fellowship scheduling together with administrative and compliance workflows. Programs can manage rotation, call, and clinic schedules, while residents, fellows,… Read the review →	Aurora-Med is a configurable scheduling system for medical residency programs that coordinates clinical rotations, resident call, and clinic assignments. It is designed for institutions managing staffing requirements, qualifications,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• MedHub — where it wins

  • Combines rotation, call, clinic, and conflict-checking workflows
  • Tracks work hours, violations, absences, and moonlighting
  • Supports mobile access, offline tasks, and schedule integrations

  Where it doesn't

  • Standard pricing requires contact with sales
  • Its broader GME scope may exceed scheduling-only needs
  • Offline task completion requires later synchronization

• Aurora-Med — where it wins

  • Combines rotation, call, clinic, staffing, and coverage scheduling.
  • Checks conflicts, workload rules, qualifications, leave, and availability.
  • Supports what-if analysis, manual overrides, APIs, and enterprise integrations.

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing is handled through contact sales.
  • Its broad configuration may be more than simple programs need.
  • The integration set centers on enterprise and project-management systems.

• MedHub8.2/10 · Pricing on request

  A broad GME platform for scheduling, compliance workflows, onboarding, and mobile access.

  Visit MedHubFull verdict →
• Aurora-Med6.9/10 · Pricing on request

  A configurable scheduler for residency programs with complex coverage and workload rules.

  Visit Aurora-MedFull verdict →