Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Patient Portal Software

Luma Health vs Patient Access

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Luma Health #6 in Patient Portal Software —/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Luma Health
Patient Access #8 in Patient Portal Software —/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Patient Access

Luma Health leads on 0 checks, Patient Access on 3, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planonly Patient Access
  • Most featuresPatient Access · 2 of 4

Our editors rank Luma Health at #6 and Patient Access at #8 for patient portal software; Luma Health and Patient Access have no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.

Patient Access offers free plan; Luma Health doesn't. Patient Access offers secure messaging; Luma Health doesn't publish it. Patient Access offers record access; Luma Health doesn't publish it.

Luma Health is the better fit for health systems focused on access and scheduling. Patient Access is the better fit for UK patients using NHS and local care services.

  • Luma Health fits best

    Health systems focused on access and scheduling

  • Patient Access fits best

    UK patients using NHS and local care services

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Luma Health —/10 Visit ↗ Patient Access —/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score — —
Ranking #6 in Patient Portal Software #8 in Patient Portal Software
Best for Health systems focused on access and scheduling UK patients using NHS and local care services
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Email, Docs Email
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo
Features Luma Health 0/4 · Patient Access 2/4
Secure messaging Not published ✓ (best)
Record access Not published ✓ (best)
Online payments Not published Not published
Digital forms Not published Not published
Specs
Appointment tools Not published Self-schedule
Mobile access Not published Web-and-app
Our review
Pros
  • Bidirectional EHR scheduling integration with appointment availability and writeback
  • Automated waitlist offers help fill canceled appointment slots
  • Scheduling, intake, reminders, telehealth, and payments in one platform
  • Book in-person or remote GP appointments and request repeat prescriptions.
  • View and share medical records, then message a GP practice.
  • Access selected NHS referrals and local pharmacy services.
Cons
  • Contact-sales pricing limits upfront plan comparison
  • Web-only access may not suit teams requiring native desktop or mobile apps
  • Emphasizes access workflows more than records and patient messaging
  • GP-linked features depend on practice participation and availability.
  • Self-referral is limited to selected NHS services.
  • It focuses on patient access rather than a broad practice portal.
Our verdict

Luma Health provides cloud software for healthcare organizations that want to manage patient access and engagement. Its capabilities cover online appointment scheduling through text messages, provider websites, and Google; configurable…

Read the review →

Patient Access connects people in the UK with participating GP practices and local health services through a website and mobile app. It is aimed at patients who want to manage routine care online: depending on their practice, they can book…

Read the review →
  1. Luma HealthPatient Portal Software —Pricing on request
  2. Patient AccessPatient Portal Software —Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Luma Health — where it wins

    • Bidirectional EHR scheduling integration with appointment availability and writeback
    • Automated waitlist offers help fill canceled appointment slots
    • Scheduling, intake, reminders, telehealth, and payments in one platform

    Where it doesn't

    • Contact-sales pricing limits upfront plan comparison
    • Web-only access may not suit teams requiring native desktop or mobile apps
    • Emphasizes access workflows more than records and patient messaging
  • Patient Access — where it wins

    • Book in-person or remote GP appointments and request repeat prescriptions.
    • View and share medical records, then message a GP practice.
    • Access selected NHS referrals and local pharmacy services.

    Where it doesn't

    • GP-linked features depend on practice participation and availability.
    • Self-referral is limited to selected NHS services.
    • It focuses on patient access rather than a broad practice portal.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026