Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software
EasyChair vs Airballoon
EasyChair leads on 0 checks, Airballoon on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreEasyChair · 8.5/10
- Free planboth
EasyChair scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 8.5 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.
EasyChair is the better fit for established academic conferences on a budget. Airballoon is the better fit for end-to-end conferences with attendee operations.
- EasyChair fits best
Established academic conferences on a budget
- Airballoon fits best
End-to-end conferences with attendee operations
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | EasyChair 8.5/10 Visit ↗ | Airballoon 8.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Ranking | #2 in Call for Papers Software | #3 in Call for Papers Software |
| Best for | Established academic conferences on a budget | End-to-end conferences with attendee operations |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Docs | Email, Docs |
| Compliance | GDPR | SSO/SAML, PCI DSS |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 9 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features EasyChair 2/2 · Airballoon 2/2 | ||
| Blind review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schedule builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Submission types | Mixed | Mixed |
| Review stages | Custom | Custom |
| Submission limit | 20 submissions | Not published |
| Reviewer limit | 200 reviewers | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | EasyChair is a web-based conference management system for chairs, program committees, reviewers, authors, and organizers. It covers the academic event workflow from call-for-papers publishing and abstract or paper submission through… Read the review → |
Airballoon is a web-based conference-management platform from Lumvex Labs LLC for academic conferences and workshops. It covers the conference lifecycle from CFP publication and paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions through… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
EasyChair — where it wins
- Free tier covers submissions, reviewing, blind review, hosting, and backups
- Supports rebuttals, scheduling, proceedings, registration, and Smart CFP
- Professional and Executive add program, analytics, export, and integration features
Where it doesn't
- Free is sized for up to 20 submissions and 200 reviewers
- Paid tiers charge per submission rather than through annual pricing
- Access is web-based, with advanced needs split across multiple tiers
Airballoon — where it wins
- Supports paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions
- Combines blind review, committee management, and custom review stages
- Extends into websites, schedules, registration, networking, and payments
Where it doesn't
- Registration can incur transaction fees
- Presentation storage can incur storage fees
- Its broad event scope may exceed the needs of CFP-only teams
- EasyChair8.5/10 · Free plan · paid from $4
A broad academic conference workflow with a useful free tier and usage-based upgrades.
Visit EasyChairFull verdict → - Airballoon8.2/10 · Free plan
A broad web-based conference system covering CFPs, review, event operations, and attendee engagement.
Visit AirballoonFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Microsoft CMT vs EasyChair
- Microsoft CMT vs Airballoon
- EasyChair vs SimplyConf
- EasyChair vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
- EasyChair vs HotCRP
- EasyChair vs OpenReview
- Airballoon vs SimplyConf
- Airballoon vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
All call for papers software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





