Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software

Microsoft CMT vs Airballoon

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Microsoft CMT #1 in Call for Papers Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Microsoft CMT
Airballoon #3 in Call for Papers Software 8.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Airballoon

Microsoft CMT leads on 0 checks, Airballoon on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMicrosoft CMT · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth

Microsoft CMT scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 9.0 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Microsoft CMT is the better fit for free, full-featured academic conferences. Airballoon is the better fit for end-to-end conferences with attendee operations.

  • Microsoft CMT fits best

    Free, full-featured academic conferences

  • Airballoon fits best

    End-to-end conferences with attendee operations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Microsoft CMT 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Airballoon 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.2
Ranking #1 in Call for Papers Software #3 in Call for Papers Software
Best for Free, full-featured academic conferences End-to-end conferences with attendee operations
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 1 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Microsoft CMT 2/2 · Airballoon 2/2
Blind review ✓ ✓
Schedule builder ✓ ✓
Specs
Submission types Mixed Mixed
Review stages Custom Custom
Submission limit Not published Not published
Reviewer limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
  • Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
  • Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling
  • Supports paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions
  • Combines blind review, committee management, and custom review stages
  • Extends into websites, schedules, registration, networking, and payments
Cons
  • Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
  • Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
  • Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
  • Registration can incur transaction fees
  • Presentation storage can incur storage fees
  • Its broad event scope may exceed the needs of CFP-only teams
Our verdict

Microsoft CMT is a free, cloud-hosted conference management system for academic and scientific peer review. It is designed for conference chairs, reviewers, authors, and proceedings editors managing submissions from abstracts through full…

Read the review →

Airballoon is a web-based conference-management platform from Lumvex Labs LLC for academic conferences and workshops. It covers the conference lifecycle from CFP publication and paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions through…

Read the review →
  1. Microsoft CMTCall for Papers Software 9.0Free plan
  2. AirballoonCall for Papers Software 8.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Microsoft CMT — where it wins

    • Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
    • Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
    • Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
    • Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
    • Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
  • Airballoon — where it wins

    • Supports paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions
    • Combines blind review, committee management, and custom review stages
    • Extends into websites, schedules, registration, networking, and payments

    Where it doesn't

    • Registration can incur transaction fees
    • Presentation storage can incur storage fees
    • Its broad event scope may exceed the needs of CFP-only teams

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update