Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software
Microsoft CMT vs Airballoon
Microsoft CMT leads on 0 checks, Airballoon on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreMicrosoft CMT · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
Microsoft CMT scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 9.0 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.
Microsoft CMT is the better fit for free, full-featured academic conferences. Airballoon is the better fit for end-to-end conferences with attendee operations.
- Microsoft CMT fits best
Free, full-featured academic conferences
- Airballoon fits best
End-to-end conferences with attendee operations
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Microsoft CMT 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Airballoon 8.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.2 |
| Ranking | #1 in Call for Papers Software | #3 in Call for Papers Software |
| Best for | Free, full-featured academic conferences | End-to-end conferences with attendee operations |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Tickets, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Integrations | 1 integrations | 9 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Microsoft CMT 2/2 · Airballoon 2/2 | ||
| Blind review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schedule builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Submission types | Mixed | Mixed |
| Review stages | Custom | Custom |
| Submission limit | Not published | Not published |
| Reviewer limit | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Microsoft CMT is a free, cloud-hosted conference management system for academic and scientific peer review. It is designed for conference chairs, reviewers, authors, and proceedings editors managing submissions from abstracts through full… Read the review → |
Airballoon is a web-based conference-management platform from Lumvex Labs LLC for academic conferences and workshops. It covers the conference lifecycle from CFP publication and paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions through… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Microsoft CMT — where it wins
- Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
- Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
- Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling
Where it doesn't
- Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
- Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
- Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
Airballoon — where it wins
- Supports paper, abstract, poster, and proposal submissions
- Combines blind review, committee management, and custom review stages
- Extends into websites, schedules, registration, networking, and payments
Where it doesn't
- Registration can incur transaction fees
- Presentation storage can incur storage fees
- Its broad event scope may exceed the needs of CFP-only teams
- Microsoft CMT9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, full-featured system for managing academic submissions, reviews, rebuttals, and schedules.
Visit Microsoft CMTFull verdict → - Airballoon8.2/10 · Free plan
A broad web-based conference system covering CFPs, review, event operations, and attendee engagement.
Visit AirballoonFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Microsoft CMT vs EasyChair
- Microsoft CMT vs SimplyConf
- Microsoft CMT vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
- Microsoft CMT vs HotCRP
- Microsoft CMT vs OpenReview
- EasyChair vs Airballoon
- Airballoon vs SimplyConf
- Airballoon vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
All call for papers software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





