Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software
Microsoft CMT vs SimplyConf
Microsoft CMT leads on 0 checks, SimplyConf on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreMicrosoft CMT · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
Microsoft CMT scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 9.0 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.
Microsoft CMT is the better fit for free, full-featured academic conferences. SimplyConf is the better fit for self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing.
- Microsoft CMT fits best
Free, full-featured academic conferences
- SimplyConf fits best
Self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Microsoft CMT 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | SimplyConf 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #1 in Call for Papers Software | #4 in Call for Papers Software |
| Best for | Free, full-featured academic conferences | Self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | $29/yr |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Tickets, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Integrations | 1 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Microsoft CMT 2/2 · SimplyConf 2/2 | ||
| Blind review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schedule builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Submission types | Mixed | Mixed |
| Review stages | Custom | Custom |
| Submission limit | Not published | Not published |
| Reviewer limit | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Microsoft CMT is a free, cloud-hosted conference management system for academic and scientific peer review. It is designed for conference chairs, reviewers, authors, and proceedings editors managing submissions from abstracts through full… Read the review → |
SimplyConf is a WordPress-based conference management product for academic conferences, universities, program committees, and organizations running one or multiple events. Its free, open-source core covers events, abstract submissions, and… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Microsoft CMT — where it wins
- Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
- Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
- Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling
Where it doesn't
- Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
- Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
- Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
SimplyConf — where it wins
- Free, open-source core with web and self-hosted deployment
- Supports blind review, reviewer assignment, and review progress tracking
- Adds Stripe payments, scheduling, email, and export workflows
Where it doesn't
- Reviews, emails, payments, schedules, and exports require paid add-ons
- WordPress is central to the product's ecosystem fit
- Managed hosting and self-hosting involve different deployment choices
- Microsoft CMT9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, full-featured system for managing academic submissions, reviews, rebuttals, and schedules.
Visit Microsoft CMTFull verdict → - SimplyConf7.9/10 · Free plan · paid from $29/yr
A flexible WordPress-based choice for conferences that need self-hosting and add-on control.
Visit SimplyConfFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Microsoft CMT vs EasyChair
- Microsoft CMT vs Airballoon
- Microsoft CMT vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
- Microsoft CMT vs HotCRP
- Microsoft CMT vs OpenReview
- EasyChair vs SimplyConf
- Airballoon vs SimplyConf
- SimplyConf vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
All call for papers software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





