Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software

Microsoft CMT vs SimplyConf

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Microsoft CMT #1 in Call for Papers Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Microsoft CMT
SimplyConf #4 in Call for Papers Software 7.9/10 Free plan · paid from $29/yr Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit SimplyConf

Microsoft CMT leads on 0 checks, SimplyConf on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMicrosoft CMT · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth

Microsoft CMT scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 9.0 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.

Microsoft CMT is the better fit for free, full-featured academic conferences. SimplyConf is the better fit for self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing.

  • Microsoft CMT fits best

    Free, full-featured academic conferences

  • SimplyConf fits best

    Self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Microsoft CMT 9.0/10 Visit ↗ SimplyConf 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 7.9
Ranking #1 in Call for Papers Software #4 in Call for Papers Software
Best for Free, full-featured academic conferences Self-hosted conferences needing modular pricing
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published $29/yr
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 1 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Microsoft CMT 2/2 · SimplyConf 2/2
Blind review ✓ ✓
Schedule builder ✓ ✓
Specs
Submission types Mixed Mixed
Review stages Custom Custom
Submission limit Not published Not published
Reviewer limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
  • Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
  • Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling
  • Free, open-source core with web and self-hosted deployment
  • Supports blind review, reviewer assignment, and review progress tracking
  • Adds Stripe payments, scheduling, email, and export workflows
Cons
  • Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
  • Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
  • Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
  • Reviews, emails, payments, schedules, and exports require paid add-ons
  • WordPress is central to the product's ecosystem fit
  • Managed hosting and self-hosting involve different deployment choices
Our verdict

Microsoft CMT is a free, cloud-hosted conference management system for academic and scientific peer review. It is designed for conference chairs, reviewers, authors, and proceedings editors managing submissions from abstracts through full…

Read the review →

SimplyConf is a WordPress-based conference management product for academic conferences, universities, program committees, and organizations running one or multiple events. Its free, open-source core covers events, abstract submissions, and…

Read the review →
  1. Microsoft CMTCall for Papers Software 9.0Free plan
  2. SimplyConfCall for Papers Software 7.9Free plan · paid from $29/yr

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Microsoft CMT — where it wins

    • Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
    • Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
    • Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
    • Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
    • Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
  • SimplyConf — where it wins

    • Free, open-source core with web and self-hosted deployment
    • Supports blind review, reviewer assignment, and review progress tracking
    • Adds Stripe payments, scheduling, email, and export workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Reviews, emails, payments, schedules, and exports require paid add-ons
    • WordPress is central to the product's ecosystem fit
    • Managed hosting and self-hosting involve different deployment choices
  • Microsoft CMT9.0/10 · Free plan

    A free, full-featured system for managing academic submissions, reviews, rebuttals, and schedules.

    Visit Microsoft CMTFull verdict →
  • SimplyConf7.9/10 · Free plan · paid from $29/yr

    A flexible WordPress-based choice for conferences that need self-hosting and add-on control.

    Visit SimplyConfFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update