Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software

Microsoft CMT vs EasyChair

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Microsoft CMT #1 in Call for Papers Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Microsoft CMT
EasyChair #2 in Call for Papers Software 8.5/10 Free plan · paid from $4 Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit EasyChair

Microsoft CMT leads on 0 checks, EasyChair on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMicrosoft CMT · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth

Microsoft CMT scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 9.0 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Microsoft CMT is the better fit for free, full-featured academic conferences. EasyChair is the better fit for established academic conferences on a budget.

  • Microsoft CMT fits best

    Free, full-featured academic conferences

  • EasyChair fits best

    Established academic conferences on a budget

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Microsoft CMT 9.0/10 Visit ↗ EasyChair 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.5
Ranking #1 in Call for Papers Software #2 in Call for Papers Software
Best for Free, full-featured academic conferences Established academic conferences on a budget
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Docs Docs
Integrations 1 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Microsoft CMT 2/2 · EasyChair 2/2
Blind review ✓ ✓
Schedule builder ✓ ✓
Specs
Submission types Mixed Mixed
Review stages Custom Custom
Submission limit Not published 20 submissions
Reviewer limit Not published 200 reviewers
Our review
Pros
  • Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
  • Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
  • Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling
  • Free tier covers submissions, reviewing, blind review, hosting, and backups
  • Supports rebuttals, scheduling, proceedings, registration, and Smart CFP
  • Professional and Executive add program, analytics, export, and integration features
Cons
  • Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
  • Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
  • Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
  • Free is sized for up to 20 submissions and 200 reviewers
  • Paid tiers charge per submission rather than through annual pricing
  • Access is web-based, with advanced needs split across multiple tiers
Our verdict

Microsoft CMT is a free, cloud-hosted conference management system for academic and scientific peer review. It is designed for conference chairs, reviewers, authors, and proceedings editors managing submissions from abstracts through full…

Read the review →

EasyChair is a web-based conference management system for chairs, program committees, reviewers, authors, and organizers. It covers the academic event workflow from call-for-papers publishing and abstract or paper submission through…

Read the review →
  1. Microsoft CMTCall for Papers Software 9.0Free plan
  2. EasyChairCall for Papers Software 8.5Free plan · paid from $4

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Microsoft CMT — where it wins

    • Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
    • Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
    • Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
    • Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
    • Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
  • EasyChair — where it wins

    • Free tier covers submissions, reviewing, blind review, hosting, and backups
    • Supports rebuttals, scheduling, proceedings, registration, and Smart CFP
    • Professional and Executive add program, analytics, export, and integration features

    Where it doesn't

    • Free is sized for up to 20 submissions and 200 reviewers
    • Paid tiers charge per submission rather than through annual pricing
    • Access is web-based, with advanced needs split across multiple tiers
  • Microsoft CMT9.0/10 · Free plan

    A free, full-featured system for managing academic submissions, reviews, rebuttals, and schedules.

    Visit Microsoft CMTFull verdict →
  • EasyChair8.5/10 · Free plan · paid from $4

    A broad academic conference workflow with a useful free tier and usage-based upgrades.

    Visit EasyChairFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update