Head-to-head · Call for Papers Software
Microsoft CMT vs EasyChair
Microsoft CMT leads on 0 checks, EasyChair on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreMicrosoft CMT · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
Microsoft CMT scores higher on our rubric for call for papers software: 9.0 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.
Microsoft CMT is the better fit for free, full-featured academic conferences. EasyChair is the better fit for established academic conferences on a budget.
- Microsoft CMT fits best
Free, full-featured academic conferences
- EasyChair fits best
Established academic conferences on a budget
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Microsoft CMT 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | EasyChair 8.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Ranking | #1 in Call for Papers Software | #2 in Call for Papers Software |
| Best for | Free, full-featured academic conferences | Established academic conferences on a budget |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Tickets, Docs | Docs |
| Integrations | 1 integrations | 4 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Microsoft CMT 2/2 · EasyChair 2/2 | ||
| Blind review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schedule builder | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Submission types | Mixed | Mixed |
| Review stages | Custom | Custom |
| Submission limit | Not published | 20 submissions |
| Reviewer limit | Not published | 200 reviewers |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Microsoft CMT is a free, cloud-hosted conference management system for academic and scientific peer review. It is designed for conference chairs, reviewers, authors, and proceedings editors managing submissions from abstracts through full… Read the review → |
EasyChair is a web-based conference management system for chairs, program committees, reviewers, authors, and organizers. It covers the academic event workflow from call-for-papers publishing and abstract or paper submission through… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Microsoft CMT — where it wins
- Supports submissions, revisions, camera-ready papers, and presentations
- Deep review controls include blind review, conflicts, quotas, and bidding
- Covers multi-track planning, copyright collection, and session scheduling
Where it doesn't
- Web-based delivery limits the platform choice to browser access
- Reviewer capacity is configured by conference chairs, not fixed product-wide
- Its focus on academic peer review may not suit general event management
EasyChair — where it wins
- Free tier covers submissions, reviewing, blind review, hosting, and backups
- Supports rebuttals, scheduling, proceedings, registration, and Smart CFP
- Professional and Executive add program, analytics, export, and integration features
Where it doesn't
- Free is sized for up to 20 submissions and 200 reviewers
- Paid tiers charge per submission rather than through annual pricing
- Access is web-based, with advanced needs split across multiple tiers
- Microsoft CMT9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, full-featured system for managing academic submissions, reviews, rebuttals, and schedules.
Visit Microsoft CMTFull verdict → - EasyChair8.5/10 · Free plan · paid from $4
A broad academic conference workflow with a useful free tier and usage-based upgrades.
Visit EasyChairFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Microsoft CMT vs Airballoon
- Microsoft CMT vs SimplyConf
- Microsoft CMT vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
- Microsoft CMT vs HotCRP
- Microsoft CMT vs OpenReview
- EasyChair vs Airballoon
- EasyChair vs SimplyConf
- EasyChair vs MeetingHand Abstract Management
All call for papers software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





