Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

The Best Literature Review Software in 2026

We researched literature review software from official websites, including pricing pages, plan tables, and product documentation. Rankings reflect each product’s core review workflow, value for money, and verified features for discovering, screening, organizing, mapping, and synthesizing academic literature.

Our top picks

  1. Top ranked

    Buhos#1 of 28
    9.4/10

    A free, end-to-end workspace for individual and collaborative systematic reviews.

    Free plan

  2. Runner-up

    Rayyan#2 of 28
    9.3/10

    A mobile-first review workspace with free screening, AI tools, and structured extraction.

    Free plan

  3. Top-ranked free plan

    PICO Portal#3 of 28
    9.2/10

    A broad web-based workspace for AI-assisted screening, extraction, and reporting.

    Free plan · 14-day trial

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

The full ranking 28 tools, best first

28 tools
  1. Buhos

    Best forFree, end-to-end systematic review teams

    A free, end-to-end workspace for individual and collaborative systematic reviews.

    • Full-text management
    • Systematic review tools
    • Collaboration
    9.4/10★★★★★
    Visit Buhos
  2. Rayyan

    Best forMobile-first collaborative review teams

    A mobile-first review workspace with free screening, AI tools, and structured extraction.

    • Screening workflow
    9.3/10★★★★★
    Visit Rayyan
  3. Best forAI-assisted systematic review teams

    A broad web-based workspace for AI-assisted screening, extraction, and reporting.

    • Screening workflow
    9.2/10★★★★★
    Visit PICO Portal
  4. CADIMA

    Best forTeams wanting a free structured review platform

    A free, structured workspace for collaborative literature reviews.

    • Full-text management
    • Evidence mapping
    • Systematic review tools
    9.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit CADIMA
  5. Elicit

    Best forResearchers combining discovery and review automation

    A research assistant that combines discovery, evidence gathering, and review automation.

    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Elicit
  6. ASReview

    Best forOpen-source AI-assisted screening

    A capable free screening tool for teams that can manage full-text access separately.

    • Systematic review tools
    • Collaboration
    • Screening workflow
    8.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit ASReview
  7. INRA

    Best forAI-assisted reviews with source verification

    A broad review workflow with citation inspection, screening, extraction, and PRISMA outputs.

    • Screening workflow
    Free plan Our INRA verdict → Visit INRA
    8.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit INRA
  8. Best forAdvanced mixed-methods evidence synthesis

    A broad evidence-synthesis workspace for advanced mixed-methods reviews.

    • Screening workflow
    8.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit EPPI-Reviewer
  9. Synthesis

    Best forDesktop-based comprehensive review workflows

    A comprehensive desktop workflow for searching, screening, managing, and synthesizing literature.

    • Full-text management
    • Systematic review tools
    • Collaboration
    Pricing on request Our Synthesis verdict → Visit Synthesis
    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Synthesis
  10. Sysrev

    Best forFlexible AI labeling and screening workflows

    A flexible literature review workspace with structured screening and AI labeling.

    • Screening workflow
    8.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit Sysrev
  11. Best forTeams needing active-learning prioritization

    A collaborative screening workspace that prioritizes references and supports full-text review.

    • Screening workflow
    8.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit SWIFT-Active
  12. Best forDeep evidence synthesis with advanced AI

    A deep evidence-synthesis workspace with advanced AI and substantial paid-tier costs.

    • Screening workflow
    8.2/10★★★★☆
    Try Nested Knowledge
  13. Covidence

    Best forMature, polished systematic review teams

    A polished, collaborative review workspace for teams managing evidence from screening to export.

    • Screening workflow
    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Covidence
  14. Colandr

    Best forFree open-source collaborative reviews

    A free collaborative review workspace with screening, extraction, deduplication, and exports.

    • Screening workflow
    8.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Colandr
  15. EviSynth

    Best forFree AI-assisted abstract screening

    A free, open-source option for collaborative, AI-assisted abstract screening.

    • Systematic review tools
    • Collaboration
    • Screening workflow
    7.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit EviSynth
  16. Abstrackr

    Best forFree teams focused on screening accuracy

    A free screening workspace for teams that prioritize accurate, structured citation review.

    • Screening workflow
    7.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit Abstrackr
  17. Best forEstablished healthcare evidence review teams

    A broad evidence-review workspace for established healthcare research teams.

    • Systematic review tools
    • Collaboration
    • Screening workflow
    7.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit JBI SUMARI
  18. RevMan

    Best forReviews centered on meta-analysis

    A focused choice for structured reviews, statistical synthesis, and collaborative writing.

    • Systematic review tools
    • Collaboration
    Free plan · 30-day trial Our RevMan verdict → Visit RevMan
    7.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit RevMan
  19. LASER AI

    Best forHigh-budget AI extraction projects

    A structured literature review platform with deep AI extraction and a $3,000 starting price.

    • Screening workflow
    7.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit LASER AI
  20. Litmaps

    Best forLiterature mapping and discovery workflows

    A strong choice for mapping, discovering, and monitoring academic literature.

    • Full-text management
    • Evidence mapping
    • Systematic review tools
    7.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Litmaps
  21. Best forBibliometric analysis within review projects

    A strong free option for bibliometric analysis, mapping, and literature visualization.

    • Full-text management
    • Evidence mapping
    • Systematic review tools
    7.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Bibliometrix
  22. Best forFree desktop literature mining and triage

    A free desktop workbench for mining, ranking, and screening literature collections.

    • Screening workflow
    6.9/10★★★☆☆
    Visit SWIFT-Review
  23. Best forCitation-network discovery and collections

    A strong discovery and citation-mapping tool, but not a systematic-review workflow.

    • Evidence mapping
    • Collaboration
    6.8/10★★★☆☆
    Visit ResearchRabbit
  24. VOSviewer

    Best forBibliometric network visualization

    A free, focused choice for exploring and presenting bibliometric network relationships.

    6.6/10★★★☆☆
    Visit VOSviewer
  25. Best forFree visual topic discovery

    A free visual discovery tool for finding and mapping scientific literature.

    • Full-text management
    6.5/10★★★☆☆
    Visit site
  26. Best forPlain-language literature maps and drafts

    A focused starting point for exploring academic literature and shaping early review drafts.

    • Evidence mapping
    6.4/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Lit Mind Maps
  27. LitMap

    Best forAI extraction and literature-gap analysis

    A focused AI workspace for extracting evidence, clustering themes, and finding literature gaps.

    • Evidence mapping
    6.3/10★★★☆☆
    Visit LitMap
  28. Inciteful

    Best forFree citation-network paper discovery

    A free web tool for citation-led discovery, recommendations, and literature connections.

    6.1/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Inciteful

No tools match those filters.

Compare at a glance

#ToolFree planPaid fromScreening workflowScore
1BuhosYesFreeYes9.4
2RayyanYes$8.33/seat/moYes9.3
3PICO PortalYesYes9.2
4CADIMAYesFreeYes9.0
5ElicitYes$11/user/mo8.9
6ASReviewYesFreeYes8.8
7INRAYes$7.50/seat/moYes8.7
8EPPI-ReviewerNoYes8.6
9SynthesisYes8.5
10SysrevYesYes8.4
11SWIFT-Active ScreenerYes8.3
12Nested KnowledgeNoYes8.2
13CovidenceNoYes8.1
14ColandrYesFreeYes8.0
15EviSynthYesFreeYes7.7
16AbstrackrYesFreeYes7.6
17JBI SUMARINo$130/user/yrYes7.5
18RevManYes£80/user/yrNo7.4
19LASER AINo$3,000/user/yrYes7.3
20LitmapsYes$10/moYes7.1
21BibliometrixYesFree7.0
22SWIFT-ReviewYesFreeYes6.9
23ResearchRabbitYes$10/moNo6.8
24VOSviewerYesFree6.6
25Open Knowledge MapsYesFreeNo6.5
26Lit Mind MapsYes$15/moNo6.4
27LitMapYes6.3
28IncitefulYesFreeNo6.1

Head-to-head All 26 comparisons →

Explore other topics All topics →

How we rank literature review software

Every tool on this page was researched by iTechGuides Editors from its official website — pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. We rank on how well each one does this category's core job, what the free or entry plan includes, and where it falls short. Where we have enough verified facts, the score out of 10 is a rubric — job fit, value and how much we could verify — shown with its breakdown on every tool's page; a tool we have not verified enough to score yet shows its rank without a number. Scores are re-checked when a product changes its plans. Read the full editorial policy, or submit a tool we missed.

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update