Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Literature Review Software

Buhos vs Elicit

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Buhos #1 in Literature Review Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Buhos
Elicit #5 in Literature Review Software 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Elicit

Buhos leads on 0 checks, Elicit on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBuhos · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresBuhos · 4 of 5

Buhos scores higher on our rubric for literature review software: 9.4 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.

Buhos is the better fit for free, end-to-end systematic review teams. Elicit is the better fit for researchers combining discovery and review automation.

  • Buhos fits best

    Free, end-to-end systematic review teams

  • Elicit fits best

    Researchers combining discovery and review automation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Buhos 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Elicit 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.9
Ranking #1 in Literature Review Software #5 in Literature Review Software
Best for Free, end-to-end systematic review teams Researchers combining discovery and review automation
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Free plan $11/user/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Email, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Buhos 4/5 · Elicit 0/5
Screening workflow ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Full-text management ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Systematic review tools ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Collaboration ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Evidence mapping Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Discovery tools Search Not checked yet
Citation import limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Covers screening, extraction, quality assessment, reporting, and full-text review
  • Imports BibTeX, RIS, PubMed/NBIB, JSON, and CSV references
  • Supports collaboration with reviewer assignments, comments, tags, and messaging
  • Combines semantic and keyword search across papers and clinical trials
  • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, and cited reports
  • Offers exports, research alerts, Zotero import, and API access
Cons
  • Local or independent-server deployment requires technical setup
  • Focused on systematic literature review workflows rather than broader research work
  • Export options are limited to BibTeX, Excel, and GraphML
  • Advanced research workflows use plan-based limits
  • API access starts with the Pro plan
  • Listed integration support centers on Zotero
Our verdict

Buhos is open-source software for developing and managing systematic literature reviews. It supports both individual and group-based reviews, making it suitable for researchers who need a structured process from literature discovery…

Read the review →

Elicit is a web-based AI research assistant for researchers, analysts, academics, and teams. It searches academic papers and clinical trials through semantic and keyword search, helps users organize sources, extracts information, supports…

Read the review →
  1. BuhosLiterature Review Software 9.4Free plan
  2. ElicitLiterature Review Software 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Buhos — where it wins

    • Covers screening, extraction, quality assessment, reporting, and full-text review
    • Imports BibTeX, RIS, PubMed/NBIB, JSON, and CSV references
    • Supports collaboration with reviewer assignments, comments, tags, and messaging

    Where it doesn't

    • Local or independent-server deployment requires technical setup
    • Focused on systematic literature review workflows rather than broader research work
    • Export options are limited to BibTeX, Excel, and GraphML

  • Elicit — where it wins

    • Combines semantic and keyword search across papers and clinical trials
    • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, and cited reports
    • Offers exports, research alerts, Zotero import, and API access

    Where it doesn't

    • Advanced research workflows use plan-based limits
    • API access starts with the Pro plan
    • Listed integration support centers on Zotero
  • Buhos9.4/10 · Free plan

    A free, end-to-end workspace for individual and collaborative systematic reviews.

    Visit BuhosFull verdict →
  • Elicit8.9/10 · Free plan

    A research assistant that combines discovery, evidence gathering, and review automation.

    Visit ElicitFull verdict →

More comparisons

All literature review software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update