Covidence
Covidence: A mature review workspace with broad evidence-management and collaboration workflows. Ranked #4 of 38 in AI Literature Review Software by our editors (8.5/10); pricing: Paid; best for established review teams.
At a glance
- Editor score8.5 / 10
- PricingPaid
- Best forEstablished review teams
- Free planNo
- Systematic review supportYes
- Founded2014 · Melbourne, Australia
- Facts checked20 Sep 2026
Where it wins
- Imports references from major managers, RIS, CSV, and PubMed XML
- Combines screening, extraction, appraisal, annotations, and consensus workflows
- Exports to RIS, CSV, Excel, and RevMan for downstream analysis
Where it doesn't
- Paid plans are required to use the product
- Organization pricing requires contacting sales
- The platform is available through the web
Our verdict on Covidence
Covidence is web-based software for managing systematic, scoping, rapid, literature, and related evidence reviews. It is designed for researchers, students, universities, hospitals, evidence organizations, and review teams. The workflow covers reference import, automatic duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, full-text review, risk-of-bias assessment, customizable data extraction, reviewer collaboration, consensus workflows, and export to reference managers and analysis tools. Individual reviewers and institutional teams can use the same review-management environment, with plans organized around review volume and administration needs.
Its strongest fit is the breadth of the review workflow. Covidence accepts references from EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RIS, CSV, and PubMed XML, then supports keyword highlighting during screening and exclusion reasons and notes during full-text review. Reviewers can work with side-by-side PDFs and extraction forms, use PDF annotations for risk-of-bias assessment, and receive automatic extraction suggestions. Exports include RIS, CSV, Excel, and RevMan, while integrations and compatible formats include CRS, EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RevMan, RIS, CSV, and PubMed XML. These capabilities make it a practical choice for teams that need one structured workspace rather than separate tools for each review stage.
The plan structure is straightforward. Single covers one review with unlimited collaborators for 12 months, while Package covers up to three reviews with unlimited collaborators for 12 months. Organizations includes unlimited reviews, unlimited users and collaborators, and advanced administration tools. Covidence is therefore best suited to established teams that need systematic-review workflow depth and shared administration. Smaller users with occasional review needs should weigh the paid-only model and web-based format before choosing it; teams needing organization-level administration should consider the Organizations plan.
Your product? Our editors can test Covidence in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →
Covidence pricing
All 3 Covidence plans and prices →
Covidence fact sheet
| Free plan | No |
|---|---|
| Paid from | Not verified |
| Screening workflow | Yes |
| AI paper summaries | Not verified |
| Full-text analysis | Yes |
| Systematic review support | Yes |
| Collaboration seats | Not verified |
| Export formats | RIS, CSV, XLSX, XML |
| Deployment | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web |
| Support | Email, Live chat, Docs · 24/7 |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise (editorial estimate) |
| Integrations | 9 integrations: CRS, EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RevMan … |
| Pricing | Paid (source) |
| Website | covidence.org |
| Facts checked | 20 Sep 2026 |
Covidence integrations
Covidence lists 9 integrations on its own site.
- CRS
- EndNote
- Zotero
- RefWorks
- Mendeley
- RevMan
- RIS
- CSV
- PubMed XML
Alternatives to Covidence
- EPPI-ReviewerA broad evidence-synthesis workspace with strong analysis tools and paid collaboration costs.9.2
- RayyanA collaborative screening workspace with AI ranking, PICO tools, and mobile access.8.8
- DistillerSRA configurable review platform for traceable academic, healthcare, and institutional evidence work.8.7
See all Covidence alternatives →
Covidence vs the competition
- Covidence vs EPPI-Reviewer
- Covidence vs Rayyan
- Covidence vs DistillerSR
- Covidence vs Nested Knowledge
- Covidence vs Elicit
- Covidence vs Sorcero iSLR
Compare Covidence with any tool side by side →
Also Ranked In
Covidence is ranked in 3 of our directories.
Used Covidence? Be the first to review it
The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used Covidence for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.
Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears
Featured on iTechGuides
Covidence is listed in our AI Literature Review Software directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.
<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/covidence/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/covidence.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update