Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Literature Review Software

Covidence vs Elicit

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Covidence #4 in AI Literature Review Software 8.5/10 Paid ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Covidence
Elicit #6 in AI Literature Review Software 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Elicit

Covidence leads on 0 checks, Elicit on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCovidence · 8.5/10
  • Free planonly Elicit
  • Most featuresCovidence · 3 of 4

Covidence scores higher on our rubric for ai literature review software: 8.5 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Elicit offers free plan; Covidence doesn't.

Covidence is the better fit for established review teams. Elicit is the better fit for researchers combining literature discovery and review.

  • Covidence fits best

    Established review teams

  • Elicit fits best

    Researchers combining literature discovery and review

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Covidence 8.5/10 Visit ↗ Elicit 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.3
Ranking #4 in AI Literature Review Software #6 in AI Literature Review Software
Best for Established review teams Researchers combining literature discovery and review
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — —
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Live chat, Docs · 24/7 Email, Docs
Integrations 9 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Covidence 3/4 · Elicit 0/4
Screening workflow ✓ (best) Not checked yet
AI paper summaries Not checked yet Not checked yet
Full-text analysis ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Systematic review support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Collaboration seats Not checked yet Not checked yet
Export formats RIS, CSV, XLSX, XML Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Imports references from major managers, RIS, CSV, and PubMed XML
  • Combines screening, extraction, appraisal, annotations, and consensus workflows
  • Exports to RIS, CSV, Excel, and RevMan for downstream analysis
  • Semantic search spans academic papers and more than 500 thousand clinical trials
  • Cited reports, structured extraction, and systematic-review workflows
  • API, reference-manager integrations, and team collaboration options
Cons
  • Paid plans are required to use the product
  • Organization pricing requires contacting sales
  • The platform is available through the web
  • Basic limits usage for Research Agent and Research Reports
  • Figure analysis and live collaboration require the Scale plan
  • Advanced security controls and custom deployments are Enterprise features
Our verdict

Covidence is web-based software for managing systematic, scoping, rapid, literature, and related evidence reviews. It is designed for researchers, students, universities, hospitals, evidence organizations, and review teams. The workflow…

Read the review →

Elicit is an AI research assistant for academics, scientists, policy teams, and research-driven organizations. It searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic search, generates cited research reports, summarizes and chats…

Read the review →
  1. CovidenceAI Literature Review Software 8.5Paid
  2. ElicitAI Literature Review Software 8.3Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Covidence — where it wins

    • Imports references from major managers, RIS, CSV, and PubMed XML
    • Combines screening, extraction, appraisal, annotations, and consensus workflows
    • Exports to RIS, CSV, Excel, and RevMan for downstream analysis

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid plans are required to use the product
    • Organization pricing requires contacting sales
    • The platform is available through the web

  • Elicit — where it wins

    • Semantic search spans academic papers and more than 500 thousand clinical trials
    • Cited reports, structured extraction, and systematic-review workflows
    • API, reference-manager integrations, and team collaboration options

    Where it doesn't

    • Basic limits usage for Research Agent and Research Reports
    • Figure analysis and live collaboration require the Scale plan
    • Advanced security controls and custom deployments are Enterprise features

More comparisons

All AI literature review software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update