Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Literature Review Software

EPPI-Reviewer vs Elicit

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score EPPI-Reviewer #1 in AI Literature Review Software 9.4/10 From £10/user/mo ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit EPPI-Reviewer
Elicit #7 in AI Literature Review Software 6.9/10 Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Elicit

EPPI-Reviewer leads on 3 checks, Elicit on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreEPPI-Reviewer · 9.4/10
  • Free planonly Elicit
  • Most featuresEPPI-Reviewer · 3 of 4

EPPI-Reviewer scores higher on our rubric for ai literature review software: 9.4 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.

Elicit offers free plan; EPPI-Reviewer doesn't. EPPI-Reviewer offers screening workflow; Elicit doesn't publish it. EPPI-Reviewer offers full-text analysis; Elicit doesn't publish it. EPPI-Reviewer offers systematic review support; Elicit doesn't publish it.

EPPI-Reviewer is the better fit for flexible academic evidence synthesis. Elicit is the better fit for researchers combining literature discovery and review.

  • EPPI-Reviewer fits best

    Flexible academic evidence synthesis

  • Elicit fits best

    Researchers combining literature discovery and review

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature EPPI-Reviewer 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Elicit 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 6.9
Ranking #1 in AI Literature Review Software #7 in AI Literature Review Software
Best for Flexible academic evidence synthesis Researchers combining literature discovery and review
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 2 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features EPPI-Reviewer 3/4 · Elicit 0/4
Screening workflow ✓ (best) Not published
AI paper summaries — Not published
Full-text analysis ✓ (best) Not published
Systematic review support ✓ (best) Not published
Specs
Collaboration seats 1 Not published
Export formats RIS, Harvard, Chicago, Excel, HTML, JSON Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Combines screening, coding, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis and meta-analysis
  • Supports deduplication, clustering, priority screening and study-type classification
  • Offers Zotero integration, OpenAlex discovery and browser-based access
  • Semantic search spans academic papers and more than 500 thousand clinical trials
  • Cited reports, structured extraction, and systematic-review workflows
  • API, reference-manager integrations, and team collaboration options
Cons
  • Collaboration adds a £35-per-review monthly fee
  • LLM-assisted features require separately purchased credit
  • LLM-assisted work is described as evaluation-only
  • Basic limits usage for Research Agent and Research Reports
  • Figure analysis and live collaboration require the Scale plan
  • Advanced security controls and custom deployments are Enterprise features
Our verdict

EPPI-Reviewer is web-based software for managing and analysing literature reviews, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, framework synthesis and thematic synthesis. It is designed for individual researchers and collaborative review…

Read the review →

Elicit is an AI research assistant for academics, scientists, policy teams, and research-driven organizations. It searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic search, generates cited research reports, summarizes and chats…

Read the review →
  1. EPPI-ReviewerAI Literature Review Software 9.4From £10/user/mo
  2. ElicitAI Literature Review Software 6.9Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo

Strengths and trade-offs

  • EPPI-Reviewer — where it wins

    • Combines screening, coding, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis and meta-analysis
    • Supports deduplication, clustering, priority screening and study-type classification
    • Offers Zotero integration, OpenAlex discovery and browser-based access

    Where it doesn't

    • Collaboration adds a £35-per-review monthly fee
    • LLM-assisted features require separately purchased credit
    • LLM-assisted work is described as evaluation-only
  • Elicit — where it wins

    • Semantic search spans academic papers and more than 500 thousand clinical trials
    • Cited reports, structured extraction, and systematic-review workflows
    • API, reference-manager integrations, and team collaboration options

    Where it doesn't

    • Basic limits usage for Research Agent and Research Reports
    • Figure analysis and live collaboration require the Scale plan
    • Advanced security controls and custom deployments are Enterprise features
  • EPPI-Reviewer9.4/10 · From £10/user/mo

    A broad evidence-synthesis workspace with strong analysis tools and paid collaboration costs.

    Visit EPPI-ReviewerFull verdict →
  • Elicit6.9/10 · Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo

    A broad AI workspace for discovering, extracting, and reviewing research evidence.

    Visit ElicitFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update