Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Covidence review

#4 of 38 in AI Literature Review SoftwareSystematic Review SoftwareLiterature Review Software

A mature review workspace with broad evidence-management and collaboration workflows.

8.5/10Editor score
Covidence8.5 Visit Covidence

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Covidence is web-based software for managing systematic, scoping, rapid, literature, and related evidence reviews. It is designed for researchers, students, universities, hospitals, evidence organizations, and review teams. The workflow covers reference import, automatic duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, full-text review, risk-of-bias assessment, customizable data extraction, reviewer collaboration, consensus workflows, and export to reference managers and analysis tools. Individual reviewers and institutional teams can use the same review-management environment, with plans organized around review volume and administration needs.

Its strongest fit is the breadth of the review workflow. Covidence accepts references from EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RIS, CSV, and PubMed XML, then supports keyword highlighting during screening and exclusion reasons and notes during full-text review. Reviewers can work with side-by-side PDFs and extraction forms, use PDF annotations for risk-of-bias assessment, and receive automatic extraction suggestions. Exports include RIS, CSV, Excel, and RevMan, while integrations and compatible formats include CRS, EndNote, Zotero, RefWorks, Mendeley, RevMan, RIS, CSV, and PubMed XML. These capabilities make it a practical choice for teams that need one structured workspace rather than separate tools for each review stage.

The plan structure is straightforward. Single covers one review with unlimited collaborators for 12 months, while Package covers up to three reviews with unlimited collaborators for 12 months. Organizations includes unlimited reviews, unlimited users and collaborators, and advanced administration tools. Covidence is therefore best suited to established teams that need systematic-review workflow depth and shared administration. Smaller users with occasional review needs should weigh the paid-only model and web-based format before choosing it; teams needing organization-level administration should consider the Organizations plan.

Covidence pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Imports references from major managers, RIS, CSV, and PubMed XML
    • Combines screening, extraction, appraisal, annotations, and consensus workflows
    • Exports to RIS, CSV, Excel, and RevMan for downstream analysis
  • Where it doesn't
    • Paid plans are required to use the product
    • Organization pricing requires contacting sales
    • The platform is available through the web

Covidence fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update